[閒聊] 有這種代表性人物嗎
生涯打擊率可能很穩定 每年幾乎打不到0.250
全壘打產量還蠻穩定的 一年就20幾或30幾支
但不是 狂三振的那種 (亞當蛋就先排除了)
印象中藍鳥好像很常出這種類型的球員
但也只是印象啦 不知道是不是
光芒的潘那算這類型的代表人物嗎
因為我一直在想 有長打能力 但是打擊率不高
這種球員 是否能在大聯盟穩定的生存
跟大家討論一下 謝謝大家的解答
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.42.107.129
→
06/01 18:24, , 1F
06/01 18:24, 1F
→
06/01 18:25, , 2F
06/01 18:25, 2F
推
06/01 18:25, , 3F
06/01 18:25, 3F
推
06/01 18:28, , 4F
06/01 18:28, 4F
推
06/01 18:29, , 5F
06/01 18:29, 5F
→
06/01 18:31, , 6F
06/01 18:31, 6F
→
06/01 18:32, , 7F
06/01 18:32, 7F
→
06/01 18:33, , 8F
06/01 18:33, 8F
→
06/01 18:35, , 9F
06/01 18:35, 9F
推
06/01 18:36, , 10F
06/01 18:36, 10F
噓
06/01 18:37, , 11F
06/01 18:37, 11F
抱歉 我不知道三振多和亂揮是沒有關係的
已修改 不好意思
推 blackcellar:Delgado 只有頭三年沒有二成五... 加起來也不過 82 場 06/01 18:38
→
06/01 18:38, , 12F
06/01 18:38, 12F
→
06/01 18:39, , 13F
06/01 18:39, 13F
推
06/01 18:40, , 14F
06/01 18:40, 14F
推
06/01 18:44, , 15F
06/01 18:44, 15F
推
06/01 18:45, , 16F
06/01 18:45, 16F
※ 編輯: sumade 來自: 114.42.107.129 (06/01 18:47)
推
06/01 18:46, , 17F
06/01 18:46, 17F
推
06/01 18:48, , 18F
06/01 18:48, 18F
推
06/01 18:51, , 19F
06/01 18:51, 19F
→
06/01 18:54, , 20F
06/01 18:54, 20F
推
06/01 18:55, , 21F
06/01 18:55, 21F
→
06/01 19:08, , 22F
06/01 19:08, 22F
推
06/01 19:10, , 23F
06/01 19:10, 23F
推
06/01 19:24, , 24F
06/01 19:24, 24F
推
06/01 19:26, , 25F
06/01 19:26, 25F
推
06/01 19:30, , 26F
06/01 19:30, 26F
推
06/01 19:33, , 27F
06/01 19:33, 27F
→
06/01 19:34, , 28F
06/01 19:34, 28F
→
06/01 19:47, , 29F
06/01 19:47, 29F
推
06/01 19:48, , 30F
06/01 19:48, 30F
→
06/01 19:48, , 31F
06/01 19:48, 31F
推
06/01 19:49, , 32F
06/01 19:49, 32F
推
06/01 19:50, , 33F
06/01 19:50, 33F
推
06/01 20:00, , 34F
06/01 20:00, 34F
推
06/01 20:09, , 35F
06/01 20:09, 35F
→
06/01 20:14, , 36F
06/01 20:14, 36F
→
06/01 20:17, , 37F
06/01 20:17, 37F
推
06/01 20:36, , 38F
06/01 20:36, 38F
推
06/01 20:39, , 39F
06/01 20:39, 39F
推
06/01 20:42, , 40F
06/01 20:42, 40F
推
06/01 20:42, , 41F
06/01 20:42, 41F
推
06/01 20:50, , 42F
06/01 20:50, 42F
→
06/01 21:18, , 43F
06/01 21:18, 43F
推
06/01 21:33, , 44F
06/01 21:33, 44F
→
06/01 21:34, , 45F
06/01 21:34, 45F
推
06/01 21:44, , 46F
06/01 21:44, 46F
推
06/01 21:49, , 47F
06/01 21:49, 47F
→
06/01 21:49, , 48F
06/01 21:49, 48F
推
06/01 21:53, , 49F
06/01 21:53, 49F
→
06/01 21:55, , 50F
06/01 21:55, 50F
→
06/01 22:12, , 51F
06/01 22:12, 51F
→
06/01 22:16, , 52F
06/01 22:16, 52F
→
06/01 22:20, , 53F
06/01 22:20, 53F
推
06/01 22:25, , 54F
06/01 22:25, 54F
推
06/01 22:27, , 55F
06/01 22:27, 55F
推
06/01 22:30, , 56F
06/01 22:30, 56F
推
06/01 22:35, , 57F
06/01 22:35, 57F
→
06/01 23:08, , 58F
06/01 23:08, 58F
推
06/01 23:12, , 59F
06/01 23:12, 59F
推
06/01 23:16, , 60F
06/01 23:16, 60F
→
06/01 23:28, , 61F
06/01 23:28, 61F
→
06/01 23:29, , 62F
06/01 23:29, 62F
推
06/01 23:40, , 63F
06/01 23:40, 63F
推
06/01 23:47, , 64F
06/01 23:47, 64F
推
06/02 00:05, , 65F
06/02 00:05, 65F
推
06/02 00:45, , 66F
06/02 00:45, 66F
推
06/02 00:53, , 67F
06/02 00:53, 67F
推
06/02 01:05, , 68F
06/02 01:05, 68F
推
06/02 01:26, , 69F
06/02 01:26, 69F
→
06/02 01:31, , 70F
06/02 01:31, 70F
推
06/02 04:15, , 71F
06/02 04:15, 71F
推
06/02 14:37, , 72F
06/02 14:37, 72F
推
06/05 00:07, , 73F
06/05 00:07, 73F