Pitching Mechanics Analysis Michael Pineda

看板MLB作者時間14年前 (2012/03/31 15:58), 編輯推噓12(12012)
留言24則, 14人參與, 最新討論串1/1
作者把Pineda歸類到有明顯問題和傷病風險的那區 http://tinyurl.com/7tjclqo There has been extensive discussion among Yankee fans about whether new Yankee pitcher Michael Pineda has the Inverted W or not. The bottom line on Michael Pineda's pitching mechanics is that I do not see the Inverted W in Michael Pineda's pitching mechanics, but I do see some things that concern me. First, Michael Pineda doesn't have a classic Inverted W. While his elbows do get a bit high, it's borderline at best. You can see some hints of a timing problem in the two pictures above, and in the picture directly above in particular. The thing to notice is how Michael Pineda's arm is passing through 90 degrees of external rotation but his glove side elbow has pulled back significantly and his shoulders have rotated significantly. That suggests that his arm is a bit late. You can see the same thing in the pictures above of Michael Pineda; notice how his Pitching Arm Side (PAS) forearm is vertical and at 90 degrees of external rotation and his Glove Side (GS) elbow is well behind his back. That is often an indication of a timing problem. However, what Michael Pineda does isn't as drastic as what Stephen Strasburg does; notice how much later Stephen Strasburg's PAS forearm is. Strasburg's PAS forearm is closer to horizontal whereas Michael Pineda's PAS forearm is closer to vertical, which is a significant difference. What concerns me the most about Michael Pineda's arm action is that he seems to show the ball to Center Field. Many people teach this, but it's both unnecessary and potentially injurious. If you look at high speed clips of Michael Pineda, you can see his PAS forearm rotate around at the last second as gets his hand into position to throw the ball. That late torqueing can create a timing problem and can increase the load on both the elbow and the shoulder. In the high-speed clip above, notice how he shows the ball to Center Field and how this causes his arm to be late and appears to create a timing problem. He also does all of this with his PAS elbow quite high, and possibly above the level of his shoulders in a position of Hyperabduction. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.109.64.169

03/31 16:01, , 1F
風險不小這大家都知道 但有沒發生其實就是一翻兩瞪眼..
03/31 16:01, 1F

03/31 16:02, , 2F
Lincecum的投球機制,不是也被歸類成風險很高那一型?
03/31 16:02, 2F

03/31 16:03, , 3F
按作者的歸類 盲腸的機制是大體上良好但有點小瑕疵那類
03/31 16:03, 3F

03/31 16:04, , 4F
瞭解
03/31 16:04, 4F

03/31 16:04, , 5F
其實我是不太相信倒W之類的這套啦 只是剛好看到了就
03/31 16:04, 5F

03/31 16:05, , 6F
貼上來分享一下
03/31 16:05, 6F

03/31 16:23, , 7F
這作者寫得東西很有意思喔 我覺得有點道理
03/31 16:23, 7F

03/31 17:00, , 8F
請問倒W跟W的投球姿勢差在哪嗎?
03/31 17:00, 8F

03/31 17:01, , 9F
我只記得小史和之前小熊的Prior好像是倒W的樣子...
03/31 17:01, 9F

03/31 17:28, , 10F
Verlander好像是W的樣子,投球超協調又輕鬆
03/31 17:28, 10F

03/31 17:50, , 11F
影片中看起來手的確有過慢的問題 影片看起對肩膀和手肘的
03/31 17:50, 11F

03/31 17:50, , 12F
都很大
03/31 17:50, 12F

03/31 17:51, , 13F
負擔
03/31 17:51, 13F

03/31 18:34, , 14F
我有個很小的問題..為什麼倒W不叫作M型就好,是因為
03/31 18:34, 14F

03/31 18:35, , 15F
正常的投球機制是W型嗎?
03/31 18:35, 15F

03/31 18:43, , 16F
啊,找到解釋倒W的文章了,是這樣沒錯
03/31 18:43, 16F

03/31 18:59, , 17F
有肩或肘傷的投手 與倒W的投球機制有密切關係
03/31 18:59, 17F

03/31 22:13, , 18F
為何要講倒W不講M?
03/31 22:13, 18F

03/31 22:29, , 19F
Lincecum是個怪咖,不能以常理判斷
03/31 22:29, 19F

03/31 22:55, , 20F
倒w 和M長得不一樣啊...
03/31 22:55, 20F

04/01 00:57, , 21F
真的用M那個角度 會傷更快吧...
04/01 00:57, 21F

04/01 01:32, , 22F
http://tinyurl.com/84qdhjj 看起來這球員就屬於左側那型
04/01 01:32, 22F

04/01 13:32, , 23F
04/01 13:32, 23F

04/01 23:46, , 24F
因為「標準」的姿勢是W(ex.Maddux),所以稱不標準姿勢為倒W
04/01 23:46, 24F
文章代碼(AID): #1FTha9yR (MLB)