Yankees Shouldn’t Take It Easy On The Rays
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/yankees-shouldnt-take-it-easy-on-the-rays/
Going into tonight’s action, the common assumptions seems to be that the
Yankees are going to coast on into the playoffs. They have already clinched
the division and home field advantage, and since they got most of their
regular starters and bullpen arms work yesterday, they have little incentive
to play their hardest on Wednesday night. Why work yourselves hard in a
meaningless game? Why risk injuries to your players when you have nothing to
play for?
But I’m not sure that the predominating narrative is correct in this case.
Joe Girardi has already said that he’s planning on starting many of his
regulars tonight — although who knows how long he’ll keep them in the game
— and he seems to be practicing some “gamesmanship” by choosing not to
announce his starter until closer to game time. Could it be that the Yankees
are treating tonight’s game more seriously than many people are assuming?
If they are, I have to tip my cap to the Yanks for looking past their history
with the Red Sox and realizing the larger fact: it’s in their own best
interest if the Red Sox to make the playoffs.
That’s right, Yankees fans. As horrible as it may sound, you should probably
be rooting for the Red Sox tonight.
I’m sure this thought has already crossed most people’s minds, as the Red
Sox have been a walking (and fielding, and pitching, and hitting) disaster
this past month. It’s in the Yankees’ best interests to have the weakest
teams possible make the playoffs, as it would theoretically make their march
toward the World Series even easier. And right now, what team wouldn’t like
their odds against the Red Sox?
Of course, the case can be made that the club is still incredibly talented —
they likely have a higher true-talent level than the Rays, although it’s a
debatable point at the moment — and could easily get on a roll in the
postseason. If it’s true that the Red Sox’s pitchers have been choking on
the pressure (Nate Silver found some possible evidence yesterday), then maybe
reaching the postseason would allow them to relax and go back to being a
dominant team. Anything can happen in the playoffs, right?
But if I were the Yankees, I’d prefer the Red Sox to make the postseason for
one simple reason: the Rays’ rotation. Take a look at this potential
rotation:
The Rays have their rotation lined up perfectly at the moment so Shields
could start Game 1 on the ALDS on regular rest, and Price could be moved
ahead to Game 2 and only miss one day of rest (or start Game 3 on regular
rest). And while Jeremy Hellickson is easily the weakest link of the bunch, it
’s worth remembering that he was one of the top prospects in the game coming
into the season and he has the potential to be dominating when on.
And as for Matt Moore, he’s the ultimate ace in the hole. The Rays could use
him out of the bullpen like they did with David Price in 2008, but Moore is a
much more complete and refined pitcher than Price was back then. He struck
out 11 Yankees over five innings in his first major league start, and he’s
only at around 160 IP on the season (144 IP last season). Considering Wade
Davis and Jeff Niemann have both been inconsistent at best, Moore seems the
natural fit for the #4 slot.
What team right now would want to face that rotation in a short series?
Certainly not me. It has the potential to be the most dominant AL rotation in
the postseason (although the Phillies and Giants have it beat in the NL), and
the Rays’ bullpen has also been rounding into shape recently with a 3.47 ERA
/ 3.90 FIP over the last month. Kyle Farnsworth and Joel Peralta form a
shutdown duo at the back of the ‘pen, and Jake McGee and Brandon Gomes have
both begun to realize their potential.
While the Rays’ offense isn’t nearly as strong as Boston’s, their pitching
staff is much, much stronger at the moment and is lined up well for the
postseason. Even if the Red Sox made the playoffs, they’d have to scramble
for Game One and wouldn’t be able to start Jon Lester until Game 3 at the
earliest. Right now, they simply look like a weaker and less prepared playoff
club than the Rays.
Pick your poison, Yankee fans. But if I were you, I’d think hard before
rejoicing if the Red Sox miss the playoffs.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.25.133
※ 編輯: abc12812 來自: 140.112.25.133 (09/29 13:18)
→
09/29 13:19, , 1F
09/29 13:19, 1F
→
09/29 13:19, , 2F
09/29 13:19, 2F
推
09/29 13:19, , 3F
09/29 13:19, 3F
→
09/29 13:20, , 4F
09/29 13:20, 4F
→
09/29 13:21, , 5F
09/29 13:21, 5F
→
09/29 13:21, , 6F
09/29 13:21, 6F
推
09/29 13:22, , 7F
09/29 13:22, 7F
→
09/29 13:22, , 8F
09/29 13:22, 8F
推
09/29 13:22, , 9F
09/29 13:22, 9F
推
09/29 13:22, , 10F
09/29 13:22, 10F
推
09/29 13:23, , 11F
09/29 13:23, 11F
→
09/29 13:23, , 12F
09/29 13:23, 12F
推
09/29 13:23, , 13F
09/29 13:23, 13F
推
09/29 13:23, , 14F
09/29 13:23, 14F
→
09/29 13:23, , 15F
09/29 13:23, 15F
推
09/29 13:23, , 16F
09/29 13:23, 16F
→
09/29 13:23, , 17F
09/29 13:23, 17F
→
09/29 13:23, , 18F
09/29 13:23, 18F
→
09/29 13:23, , 19F
09/29 13:23, 19F
推
09/29 13:23, , 20F
09/29 13:23, 20F
推
09/29 13:24, , 21F
09/29 13:24, 21F
推
09/29 13:24, , 22F
09/29 13:24, 22F
推
09/29 13:24, , 23F
09/29 13:24, 23F
→
09/29 13:24, , 24F
09/29 13:24, 24F
推
09/29 13:24, , 25F
09/29 13:24, 25F
推
09/29 13:24, , 26F
09/29 13:24, 26F
→
09/29 13:25, , 27F
09/29 13:25, 27F
→
09/29 13:25, , 28F
09/29 13:25, 28F
→
09/29 13:25, , 29F
09/29 13:25, 29F
→
09/29 13:25, , 30F
09/29 13:25, 30F
→
09/29 13:25, , 31F
09/29 13:25, 31F
推
09/29 13:25, , 32F
09/29 13:25, 32F
→
09/29 13:26, , 33F
09/29 13:26, 33F
推
09/29 13:26, , 34F
09/29 13:26, 34F
推
09/29 13:29, , 35F
09/29 13:29, 35F
→
09/29 13:30, , 36F
09/29 13:30, 36F
→
09/29 13:31, , 37F
09/29 13:31, 37F
推
09/29 13:31, , 38F
09/29 13:31, 38F
→
09/29 13:31, , 39F
09/29 13:31, 39F
推
09/29 13:33, , 40F
09/29 13:33, 40F
→
09/29 13:34, , 41F
09/29 13:34, 41F
推
09/29 13:35, , 42F
09/29 13:35, 42F
推
09/29 13:35, , 43F
09/29 13:35, 43F
噓
09/29 13:35, , 44F
09/29 13:35, 44F
推
09/29 13:39, , 45F
09/29 13:39, 45F
→
09/29 13:44, , 46F
09/29 13:44, 46F
→
09/29 13:45, , 47F
09/29 13:45, 47F
推
09/29 13:45, , 48F
09/29 13:45, 48F
推
09/29 13:45, , 49F
09/29 13:45, 49F
→
09/29 13:46, , 50F
09/29 13:46, 50F
→
09/29 13:46, , 51F
09/29 13:46, 51F
→
09/29 13:47, , 52F
09/29 13:47, 52F
推
09/29 13:49, , 53F
09/29 13:49, 53F
→
09/29 13:49, , 54F
09/29 13:49, 54F
推
09/29 13:50, , 55F
09/29 13:50, 55F
→
09/29 13:50, , 56F
09/29 13:50, 56F
推
09/29 13:51, , 57F
09/29 13:51, 57F
推
09/29 13:53, , 58F
09/29 13:53, 58F
→
09/29 13:53, , 59F
09/29 13:53, 59F
→
09/29 13:55, , 60F
09/29 13:55, 60F
推
09/29 14:00, , 61F
09/29 14:00, 61F
→
09/29 14:03, , 62F
09/29 14:03, 62F
推
09/29 14:03, , 63F
09/29 14:03, 63F
推
09/29 14:04, , 64F
09/29 14:04, 64F
→
09/29 14:05, , 65F
09/29 14:05, 65F
推
09/29 14:05, , 66F
09/29 14:05, 66F
推
09/29 14:15, , 67F
09/29 14:15, 67F
推
09/29 14:22, , 68F
09/29 14:22, 68F
→
09/29 15:13, , 69F
09/29 15:13, 69F
→
09/29 15:14, , 70F
09/29 15:14, 70F
推
09/29 16:06, , 71F
09/29 16:06, 71F
→
09/29 16:07, , 72F
09/29 16:07, 72F
→
09/29 16:09, , 73F
09/29 16:09, 73F
推
09/29 17:23, , 74F
09/29 17:23, 74F
→
09/29 17:24, , 75F
09/29 17:24, 75F
→
09/29 17:25, , 76F
09/29 17:25, 76F
推
09/29 17:44, , 77F
09/29 17:44, 77F
推
09/29 18:41, , 78F
09/29 18:41, 78F
推
09/29 20:25, , 79F
09/29 20:25, 79F
推
09/29 23:55, , 80F
09/29 23:55, 80F