[外電] Dodgers Sign Ted Lilly

看板MLB作者 (mon)時間13年前 (2010/10/20 23:10), 編輯推噓21(21018)
留言39則, 28人參與, 最新討論串1/1
The Dodgers have signed Ted Lilly to a three-year, $33MM contract that was finalized today when the 34-year-old pitcher passed a physical. Dylan Hernandez of the Los Angeles Times (via Twitter) reports that Lilly has a full no-trade clause for the first two seasons of the deal, and the left-hander will receive a $3.5MM signing bonus to be paid out over all three years. Ken Rosenthal of FoxSports.com broke the news of the agreement last Saturday, and MLB.com's Ken Gurnick was the first to confirm the dollar amount (both Twitter links). Los Angeles acquired Lilly from the Cubs at the trade deadline this summer, and watched him post a 3.52 ERA with 9.0 K/9 and 1.8 BB/9 in dozen starts (76.2 innings). He also threw his first complete game shutout since 2004 while in a Dodgers' uniform. Lilly just wrapped up the four year, $40MM contract he signed with Chicago before the 2007 season. Lilly projected to be a Type-A free agent, so the Dodgers will be forfeiting a chance at two high draft picks with the move. Of course they would have had to offer arbitration and Lilly would have had to turn it down for that to happen, and neither of those things was a given. Lilly was positioned to be one of the best free agent starting pitchers available, and Sports Illustrated's Jon Heyman (via Twitter) calls the signing a "bargain" for Los Angeles considering what Lilly could've earned on the open market. Apparently he preferred to sign quickly, and given how the market played out last offseason, it's hard to blame him. 道奇簽下Lilly姐 3y/33M 平均1年1100萬喔= = 不知划不划算 應該沒OP吧?有OP會自刪 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.171.26.157

10/20 23:12, , 1F
Lilly~
10/20 23:12, 1F

10/20 23:13, , 2F
不受傷擺廢應該挺不錯的
10/20 23:13, 2F

10/20 23:19, , 3F
10/20 23:19, 3F

10/20 23:19, , 4F
有點貴
10/20 23:19, 4F

10/20 23:19, , 5F
其實如果健康出賽還可以啦
10/20 23:19, 5F

10/20 23:20, , 6F
Lilly 34歲拿到3年33M, Lee32歲該拿...?
10/20 23:20, 6F

10/20 23:23, , 7F
再晚一點決定,Lilly可能就不只33M/3y了
10/20 23:23, 7F

10/20 23:32, , 8F
只有3年是還好阿
10/20 23:32, 8F

10/20 23:33, , 9F
不錯的價錢 正常發揮的話符合身價
10/20 23:33, 9F

10/20 23:42, , 10F
這約簽得不錯
10/20 23:42, 10F

10/20 23:45, , 11F
能維持交易之後的表現這約一點都不貴
10/20 23:45, 11F

10/20 23:51, , 12F
Ted Lilly不錯阿
10/20 23:51, 12F

10/20 23:53, , 13F
Lilly假如不痛一點都不貴 這幾年ERA都有110+
10/20 23:53, 13F

10/20 23:54, , 14F
而且我覺得他算是被低估,他至少NO.2~3 pitcher
10/20 23:54, 14F

10/20 23:55, , 15F
他今年在小熊也投不錯 ERA3.69 ....3W 8L
10/20 23:55, 15F

10/20 23:55, , 16F
到小熊後whip最高一年也才1.226
10/20 23:55, 16F

10/21 00:00, , 17F
這份約對道奇來講真的不錯 不過經紀人沒有要求3+1這種喔@@?
10/21 00:00, 17F

10/21 00:00, , 18F
不貴+1,但年紀是隱憂
10/21 00:00, 18F

10/21 00:01, , 19F
這樣還蠻佛心的....
10/21 00:01, 19F

10/21 00:16, , 20F
很划算的價碼 對道奇而言
10/21 00:16, 20F

10/21 00:32, , 21F
道奇老闆怎麼還不換掉GM啊 都沒錢了 GM還一直買貴 真笨
10/21 00:32, 21F

10/21 00:35, , 22F
上面就一堆人說不貴了 你是眼睛閉著在看文嗎
10/21 00:35, 22F

10/21 00:36, , 23F
國聯2號、美聯3號
10/21 00:36, 23F

10/21 00:39, , 24F
美東5號
10/21 00:39, 24F

10/21 00:42, , 25F
Dodgers賺 可是3年對Lilly來說或許有點短...
10/21 00:42, 25F

10/21 00:47, , 26F
從傷病史來看當然貴啊 怎麼會划算
10/21 00:47, 26F

10/21 01:00, , 27F
我也覺得不貴耶...以他的成績而言就算給他痛1年也是
10/21 01:00, 27F

10/21 01:00, , 28F
賺吧
10/21 01:00, 28F

10/21 01:04, , 29F
剛剛查了一下...近幾年除了05年只丟126IP外,其他
10/21 01:04, 29F

10/21 01:05, , 30F
平均都有丟到180IP左右,這種傷痛史還好吧
10/21 01:05, 30F

10/21 05:44, , 31F
就不要成為下一個Mike Schmidt
10/21 05:44, 31F

10/21 05:47, , 32F
Do You Want My Fastball?
10/21 05:47, 32F

10/21 05:53, , 33F
Jason...
10/21 05:53, 33F

10/21 05:55, , 34F
阿阿 記錯名字了
10/21 05:55, 34F

10/21 06:06, , 35F
美元貶值
10/21 06:06, 35F

10/21 06:52, , 36F
KUO能拿多少? 想不到道奇還給的出這種價碼
10/21 06:52, 36F

10/21 08:12, , 37F
還好拉...不受傷的話XD
10/21 08:12, 37F

10/21 08:14, , 38F
莉莉姐還不差吧
10/21 08:14, 38F

10/22 21:24, , 39F
u want my fastball ?
10/22 21:24, 39F
文章代碼(AID): #1ClmQ2jK (MLB)