只是想學點觀念,想知道為什麼這樣選好或不好。在下人權指數只有銀牌一,嚴
重缺乏觀念。
這次AHQ一直被罵下路選Jinx和雷歐娜。
Jinx的話我可以理解,低機動性碰到對面一堆衝臉角,要穩定輸出很困難。雷歐
娜被說是為了中路選的,而不是為了輔助下路。
在銀牌的世界,雷歐娜算是百搭輔助。三個控場一個突進,主點w還不錯硬。看
評論一直說,Jinx和雷歐娜打路西恩和布朗母難打,但我不懂為什麼,希望有人
能解釋我這種低端聽聽。
面對路西恩加布朗母,雷歐娜的確很難兇人,飛上去會被布朗母舉盾攔截AD的傷
害,然後疊被動敲暈,路西恩又很滑溜一下就會給他跑了。但反過來說,有雷歐
娜在場,能把人定住敲暈,對面也很難兇人。布朗母放大開,雷歐納也可以放大
反開,反之亦然。
簡單來說,技術差不多的情況下,兩邊應該都打不出什麼東西來。
很想聽聽為什麼這樣選不好。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 76.91.17.254
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1411513854.A.2F3.html
→
09/24 07:17, , 1F
09/24 07:17, 1F
推
09/24 07:20, , 2F
09/24 07:20, 2F
→
09/24 07:23, , 3F
09/24 07:23, 3F
推
09/24 07:26, , 4F
09/24 07:26, 4F
推
09/24 07:27, , 5F
09/24 07:27, 5F
推
09/24 07:37, , 6F
09/24 07:37, 6F
推
09/24 07:41, , 7F
09/24 07:41, 7F
→
09/24 07:44, , 8F
09/24 07:44, 8F
推
09/24 07:47, , 9F
09/24 07:47, 9F
→
09/24 07:48, , 10F
09/24 07:48, 10F
→
09/24 07:49, , 11F
09/24 07:49, 11F
推
09/24 07:49, , 12F
09/24 07:49, 12F
→
09/24 07:49, , 13F
09/24 07:49, 13F
→
09/24 07:51, , 14F
09/24 07:51, 14F
推
09/24 07:53, , 15F
09/24 07:53, 15F
推
09/24 08:06, , 16F
09/24 08:06, 16F
推
09/24 08:07, , 17F
09/24 08:07, 17F
推
09/24 08:07, , 18F
09/24 08:07, 18F
推
09/24 08:14, , 19F
09/24 08:14, 19F
→
09/24 08:15, , 20F
09/24 08:15, 20F
推
09/24 08:17, , 21F
09/24 08:17, 21F
→
09/24 08:17, , 22F
09/24 08:17, 22F
→
09/24 08:22, , 23F
09/24 08:22, 23F
→
09/24 08:23, , 24F
09/24 08:23, 24F
※ 編輯: baelrog (76.91.17.254), 09/24/2014 08:23:36
推
09/24 08:27, , 25F
09/24 08:27, 25F
→
09/24 08:34, , 26F
09/24 08:34, 26F
→
09/24 08:42, , 27F
09/24 08:42, 27F
→
09/24 08:42, , 28F
09/24 08:42, 28F
推
09/24 08:43, , 29F
09/24 08:43, 29F
→
09/24 08:43, , 30F
09/24 08:43, 30F
→
09/24 08:43, , 31F
09/24 08:43, 31F
推
09/24 08:49, , 32F
09/24 08:49, 32F
推
09/24 09:03, , 33F
09/24 09:03, 33F
推
09/24 09:14, , 34F
09/24 09:14, 34F
推
09/24 09:30, , 35F
09/24 09:30, 35F
→
09/24 09:31, , 36F
09/24 09:31, 36F
→
09/24 09:33, , 37F
09/24 09:33, 37F
→
09/24 09:33, , 38F
09/24 09:33, 38F
推
09/24 09:37, , 39F
09/24 09:37, 39F
→
09/24 09:38, , 40F
09/24 09:38, 40F
→
09/24 09:38, , 41F
09/24 09:38, 41F
→
09/24 09:39, , 42F
09/24 09:39, 42F
→
09/24 09:39, , 43F
09/24 09:39, 43F
→
09/24 09:40, , 44F
09/24 09:40, 44F
→
09/24 09:41, , 45F
09/24 09:41, 45F
→
09/24 09:41, , 46F
09/24 09:41, 46F
推
09/24 10:20, , 47F
09/24 10:20, 47F
推
09/24 10:31, , 48F
09/24 10:31, 48F
→
09/24 10:31, , 49F
09/24 10:31, 49F
→
09/24 10:42, , 50F
09/24 10:42, 50F
推
09/24 13:28, , 51F
09/24 13:28, 51F
→
09/24 15:03, , 52F
09/24 15:03, 52F
推
09/25 10:29, , 53F
09/25 10:29, 53F
→
09/25 16:26, , 54F
09/25 16:26, 54F