賽前推特
https://twitter.com/Locodoco/status/512524523942330368
Regi:想聽個笑話嗎? DL的分析
(指賽前DL在主播台上預測B組出線組合為1.皇族 2.TPA )
↓
Loco:想聽另外一個嗎? Monte的教練指導
↓
Monte:@Loco 很難相信我們以前是朋友,而現在你變成這麼一個渾蛋
(註:Monte賽前預測B組出線組合為1.皇族 2.TSM )
↓
Loco:可不是嗎? 也許你別再躲在後面當什麼分~析~屍~
還有別在Summoning Insight上講我們的屁話,我們還能繼續當朋友
賽後
https://twitter.com/CLGDoublelift/status/512683824145117184
DL:怎麼能有人表現像個屁孩一樣在那邊酸,只是因為我們沒有預測你會出線LOL?
↓
SV:抓馬,好吃
↓
Regi:只是個"玩笑"阿~ 你自己知道的最清楚吧? 你不是常"開玩笑"說其他人都是垃圾?
我不覺得你會放在心上
↓
Krepo:你真的要繼續讓你這幼稚的行為影響到你的選手們嗎?
(指Regi的個人行為讓粉絲不爽TSM)
沃德媽媽咪呀Regi,這樣下去太超過了,拜託退一步然後想清楚你在幹嘛
本來是補完今天的VOD後本來想找一下TSM的賽後訪談,然後發現Travis居然沒有作
研究一下才大略知道這新仇舊恨的前因後果
ongamers有一個節目叫做Summoning Insight,就一些選手、分析師、記者的談話性節目
然後thoorin好像常說Regi像隻猴子,而其他人常批評TSM
(我沒看過這節目,從他們那聽來的)
所以Regi不爽ongamers→不給ongamers作訪談→Travis也是ongamers的人所以遭殃
→沒訪談看→我哭
今天Regi跟Loco的個人行為引起很多粉絲的不滿(Reddit首篇)
甚至因此有人希望TSM打包回家,希望這兩人不要再因為個人行為影響到TSM了囧
--
我對我失控的舉動感到很懊悔,但是如果給我重來一次
我還是會給他一記頭鎚。
-- Zinedine Zidane
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.116.158.84
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1411072772.A.36B.html
推
09/19 04:42, , 1F
09/19 04:42, 1F
推
09/19 04:42, , 2F
09/19 04:42, 2F
→
09/19 04:43, , 3F
09/19 04:43, 3F
→
09/19 04:43, , 4F
09/19 04:43, 4F
推
09/19 04:45, , 5F
09/19 04:45, 5F
推
09/19 04:45, , 6F
09/19 04:45, 6F
推
09/19 04:45, , 7F
09/19 04:45, 7F
推
09/19 04:48, , 8F
09/19 04:48, 8F
→
09/19 04:48, , 9F
09/19 04:48, 9F
推
09/19 04:48, , 10F
09/19 04:48, 10F
推
09/19 04:51, , 11F
09/19 04:51, 11F
→
09/19 04:52, , 12F
09/19 04:52, 12F
推
09/19 04:52, , 13F
09/19 04:52, 13F
→
09/19 04:53, , 14F
09/19 04:53, 14F
→
09/19 04:53, , 15F
09/19 04:53, 15F
→
09/19 04:54, , 16F
09/19 04:54, 16F
→
09/19 04:54, , 17F
09/19 04:54, 17F
→
09/19 04:54, , 18F
09/19 04:54, 18F
→
09/19 04:56, , 19F
09/19 04:56, 19F
→
09/19 04:57, , 20F
09/19 04:57, 20F
感謝指正,我一直以為這是Meteos本人的帳號,因為followers滿多的囧
→
09/19 04:57, , 21F
09/19 04:57, 21F
→
09/19 04:57, , 22F
09/19 04:57, 22F
→
09/19 04:57, , 23F
09/19 04:57, 23F
→
09/19 04:58, , 24F
09/19 04:58, 24F
→
09/19 04:58, , 25F
09/19 04:58, 25F
推
09/19 04:59, , 26F
09/19 04:59, 26F
推
09/19 05:01, , 27F
09/19 05:01, 27F
推
09/19 05:02, , 28F
09/19 05:02, 28F
推
09/19 05:02, , 29F
09/19 05:02, 29F
→
09/19 05:04, , 30F
09/19 05:04, 30F
→
09/19 05:05, , 31F
09/19 05:05, 31F
→
09/19 05:06, , 32F
09/19 05:06, 32F
推
09/19 05:07, , 33F
09/19 05:07, 33F
推
09/19 05:42, , 34F
09/19 05:42, 34F
→
09/19 05:54, , 35F
09/19 05:54, 35F
→
09/19 05:54, , 36F
09/19 05:54, 36F
→
09/19 05:56, , 37F
09/19 05:56, 37F
→
09/19 05:57, , 38F
09/19 05:57, 38F
推
09/19 05:59, , 39F
09/19 05:59, 39F
→
09/19 06:00, , 40F
09/19 06:00, 40F
→
09/19 06:04, , 41F
09/19 06:04, 41F
我去翻了幾集SI發現Monte真的滿常批TSM,但是他會提出他的依據跟理由
而且是以全世界為水平來說的TSM不足,若單以NA來說他甚至幾度提到TSM是當下(錄影時)
最強的隊伍
Thorin剛發最新的一集,Monte談到比爾森就說在世界賽這些隊伍裡面,以操作技巧而言
要隨便舉出六個比比爾森強的中路很簡單,而鼻爾森又得擔當caller的角色,
這也是TSM的問題,實務上讓jungle或是support來當caller會比較適合,因為中路通常
要注意的東西實在太多了。
而比爾森的call也不是很好,綜觀所有TSM贏的比賽,大多是對線期就取得大優勢直接結束
若是拖到中後期由於caller的關係常常整隊遊魂,這也是為什麼當TSM碰到實力相近的隊伍
時常常要打到BO5才能險勝。對比C9的Hai雖然操作技巧完全不如比爾森,但是他的call
好上不少,這也是為什麼C9會甘願中路的技巧不如人。
我是覺得Monte講的也算客觀實在,
Loco跟Regi難道是要讓全世界的人都搖旗大喊TSM才開心嗎囧
※ 編輯: Zidane5 (122.116.158.84), 09/19/2014 06:21:14
推
09/19 06:23, , 42F
09/19 06:23, 42F
推
09/19 06:57, , 43F
09/19 06:57, 43F
推
09/19 07:02, , 44F
09/19 07:02, 44F
→
09/19 07:02, , 45F
09/19 07:02, 45F
推
09/19 07:11, , 46F
09/19 07:11, 46F
推
09/19 07:13, , 47F
09/19 07:13, 47F
噓
09/19 07:13, , 48F
09/19 07:13, 48F
推
09/19 07:20, , 49F
09/19 07:20, 49F
推
09/19 07:21, , 50F
09/19 07:21, 50F
→
09/19 07:21, , 51F
09/19 07:21, 51F
→
09/19 07:21, , 52F
09/19 07:21, 52F
→
09/19 07:22, , 53F
09/19 07:22, 53F
推
09/19 07:31, , 54F
09/19 07:31, 54F
推
09/19 07:35, , 55F
09/19 07:35, 55F
噓
09/19 08:12, , 56F
09/19 08:12, 56F
推
09/19 08:15, , 57F
09/19 08:15, 57F
推
09/19 08:18, , 58F
09/19 08:18, 58F
推
09/19 08:27, , 59F
09/19 08:27, 59F
→
09/19 08:28, , 60F
09/19 08:28, 60F
推
09/19 08:30, , 61F
09/19 08:30, 61F
→
09/19 08:31, , 62F
09/19 08:31, 62F
推
09/19 08:41, , 63F
09/19 08:41, 63F
推
09/19 09:10, , 64F
09/19 09:10, 64F
→
09/19 09:11, , 65F
09/19 09:11, 65F
→
09/19 09:11, , 66F
09/19 09:11, 66F
→
09/19 09:12, , 67F
09/19 09:12, 67F
→
09/19 09:13, , 68F
09/19 09:13, 68F
→
09/19 09:13, , 69F
09/19 09:13, 69F
推
09/19 10:00, , 70F
09/19 10:00, 70F
推
09/19 11:03, , 71F
09/19 11:03, 71F
推
09/19 12:24, , 72F
09/19 12:24, 72F
推
09/19 12:41, , 73F
09/19 12:41, 73F
→
09/19 12:41, , 74F
09/19 12:41, 74F
推
09/19 13:51, , 75F
09/19 13:51, 75F
噓
09/19 14:05, , 76F
09/19 14:05, 76F
推
09/19 15:09, , 77F
09/19 15:09, 77F