[請益] reference

看板Linguistics作者 (千尋)時間16年前 (2008/03/26 18:26), 編輯推噓0(0推 0噓 7→)
留言7則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
Discuss how reference is equated with semantic meaning. (Use major syntactic categories as examples.) What are some of the problems of this referential approach to meaning? (Name at least three.) How can these problems be solved? 請問板上各位大大們 這個問題該怎麼回答呢? 看了又看 還是不知該怎麼辦>"< 懇請大家幫忙 謝謝^^ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.119.138.30
→
03/27 21:04, , 1F
Try Saeed's "Semantics". Everything is there.
03/27 21:04, 1F
→
03/27 21:47, , 2F
and try to discuss with your classmates
03/27 21:47, 2F
→
03/28 15:26, , 3F
請問c大^^ Saeed's "Semantics"是書名嗎?
03/28 15:26, 3F
→
03/28 15:27, , 4F
回y大 我沒有人可以討論T^T 所以才很需要藉由此版尋求幫助
03/28 15:27, 4F
→
03/28 22:35, , 5F
Saeed is the author; Semantics is the title of the
03/28 22:35, 5F
→
03/28 22:36, , 6F
the book.
03/28 22:36, 6F
→
03/29 17:51, , 7F
Thanks so much T^T
03/29 17:51, 7F
‣ 更多 yunanne 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #17wYJC2y (Linguistics)