[閒聊] Marcus Smart

看板Lakers作者 (正向思考)時間10年前 (2014/05/29 10:55), 編輯推噓57(57059)
留言116則, 34人參與, 最新討論串1/1
When you hear someone refer to Marcus Smart, you hear him described as a winner. You hear people talk about his strength, his athleticism, his effort and his leadership qualities. What you never hear is anyone refer to him as a shooter. 當你聽到有人討論Marcus Smart,聽到他是勝利者、聽到人們討論有關他的力量 、他的運動能力、他的努力與他的領袖特質。不過不會有人提到他是個射手。 Smart's lack of a reliable jump shot is widely regarded as the missing component of his game game, despite continual effort to improve in that area. How big of a concern is that for executives around the league as the NBA draft rapidly approaches? Smart缺乏穩定可靠的跳投能力是眾所皆知的,儘管非常努力去改善這個部分。 在逼近選秀日期的情況下,該如何去讓聯盟高層關注? Smart did manage to make minimal improvements as a shooter from his freshman to sophomore years at Oklahoma State, raising his field goal percentage from 40.4 to 42.2 and his 3-point percentage from 29.0 to 29.9. But, while he got to the free throw line more frequently (8.1 free throws per game vs. 6.5 as a freshman), his percentage at the stripe dipped from 77.7 to 72.8. Smart從大一到大二球季,有少量的提升他的命中率,投籃命中率從0.404提升到 0.422,三分球命中率則由0.29上升到0.299,罰球次數由每場6.5次上升到8.1次 ,不過命中率卻由0.777下降到0.728。 That being said, one veteran NBA general manager went on record with ESPN's NBA draft expert Chad Ford in saying that Smart's shooting is better than many perceive. 話雖如此,不過一名聯盟資深的GM告訴ESPN的選秀專家Chad Ford,其實Smart的 投籃要比一般人認知的還要好。 "I don't think Marcus is a bad shooter," he told Ford. "I think his form looks pretty good and you see it will go in when he's squared and taking good shots. I think the issue is that Marcus took a lot of bad shots. He was trying to do too much at Oklahoma State. If he can trust his teammates in the NBA and be a leader, I think he'll be just fine as a shooter. Shot selection is the key for him." "我不認為他是個差勁的射手",他告訴Ford。"我認為當他在好的狀況下會有不錯 的投射。他的問題大概是出在一些不好的出手選擇。他做得太多了(亦即一肩扛責) ,如果他在進入聯盟後作為一個領導者並可以去信任隊友的話,我想他會是個好的 射手。對他而言,投籃的選擇將是關鍵。" Given that Smart's primary roles as a rookie will likely be to defend and distribute, regardless of which team drafts him, the reduced pressure to be his team's primary scorer could allow the point guard to thrive early in his NBA career. 無論是哪個球隊選擇了他,若在菜鳥球季給予他的主要任務是分配球權與防守, 減低他在球隊的得分重擔,將會使他的早期職業生涯獲得完善的成長。 ------ 看來到湖人是很好的選擇,一開始絕對不會要你一直得分,而且養後場一直很有心得 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.164.148.141 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Lakers/M.1401332144.A.5DB.html

05/29 10:58, , 1F
05/29 10:58, 1F

05/29 11:05, , 2F
他的假摔到底有什麼代表作啊 ww
05/29 11:05, 2F

05/29 11:12, , 3F
來吧 挺喜歡他的
05/29 11:12, 3F

05/29 11:12, , 4F
今年樂透區看起來都很有天份 但只有聰明哥給我想贏的感覺
05/29 11:12, 4F

05/29 11:13, , 5F
至少這個性會跟老科處得來 但NO.7不一定拿得到他...
05/29 11:13, 5F

05/29 11:19, , 6F
我比較喜歡Gordon就是了 XD
05/29 11:19, 6F

05/29 11:33, , 7F
這不就是說湖人嗎 快來吧
05/29 11:33, 7F

05/29 11:36, , 8F
反正都是被動 選到誰就好好養
05/29 11:36, 8F

05/29 11:59, , 9F
那段怎麼像是形容kb XDD
05/29 11:59, 9F

05/29 12:03, , 10F
假摔現在在NBA是必備技能了 沒差XD
05/29 12:03, 10F

05/29 12:09, , 11F
我的意見是演得太假XD
05/29 12:09, 11F

05/29 12:13, , 12F
壯碩 願意防守 好勝心強 這幾點就夠了 其他在開發吧
05/29 12:13, 12F

05/29 12:21, , 13F
一樓影片太有趣了XD
05/29 12:21, 13F

05/29 12:31, , 14F
剛逛一下 塞爾提克版 他們想選的也都跟我們差不多ㄟ@@
05/29 12:31, 14F

05/29 12:38, , 15F
樓上是順位一樣喔?不然本來就是這幾隻選一隻吧
05/29 12:38, 15F

05/29 12:54, , 16F
05/29 12:54, 16F

05/29 12:57, , 17F
賽版 更機車的是說 不用管哪隻 反正就選湖人想選的....
05/29 12:57, 17F

05/29 12:59, , 18F
有差嗎....湖人不管怎麼選都不虧阿 都沒人
05/29 12:59, 18F

05/29 13:01, , 19F
進攻犯規本來就是個很奇妙的東西 同個動作就算可能
05/29 13:01, 19F

05/29 13:01, , 20F
湖人除了SG外通通可選,你要怎麼攔?XD
05/29 13:01, 20F

05/29 13:01, , 21F
真的沒差阿 湖人什麼都缺 誰來都好 XD
05/29 13:01, 21F

05/29 13:01, , 22F
塞隊亂選只是害自己更難重建
05/29 13:01, 22F

05/29 13:01, , 23F
本來就犯規 但如果你不倒地 裁判通常是不會吹的
05/29 13:01, 23F

05/29 13:02, , 24F
這隻個性感覺跟KOBE有像
05/29 13:02, 24F

05/29 13:02, , 25F
賽隊也差不多啦 也算很多洞可以補
05/29 13:02, 25F

05/29 13:05, , 26F
賽隊主要補C and sg 吧,缺火力 但他們順位也抽不到想
05/29 13:05, 26F

05/29 13:05, , 27F
要的,也不排除交易選秀
05/29 13:05, 27F

05/29 13:06, , 28F
剛好C跟SG沒人才 XD
05/29 13:06, 28F

05/29 13:10, , 29F
越來越想要Smart了 居然還內建聯盟最新需求-假摔技能
05/29 13:10, 29F

05/29 13:42, , 30F
反正我們要補的位子那麼多 攔不了低(疑)
05/29 13:42, 30F

05/29 13:44, , 31F
反而魔術更有機會攔Smart XDD
05/29 13:44, 31F

05/29 13:52, , 32F
還存有一點Exum會掉下來的期待
05/29 13:52, 32F

05/29 13:52, , 33F
雖然不覺得魔術會放掉
05/29 13:52, 33F

05/29 14:03, , 34F
魔術很難講 論天份Exum明顯比較高 但怕養壞(高大型PG)
05/29 14:03, 34F

05/29 14:13, , 35F
Smart + Oladipo 也太矮了,沒道理跳過 Exum 選 Smart 啊
05/29 14:13, 35F

05/29 14:15, , 36F
太陽擺雙衛是交易的關係,正常能選的情況下我覺得不會
05/29 14:15, 36F

05/29 14:15, , 37F
搞這麼小的陣容,而且還有Afflalo和Nelson搶時間
05/29 14:15, 37F

05/29 14:20, , 38F
喔喔
05/29 14:20, 38F

05/29 14:32, , 39F
老大,攔不下來阿 他搭的是火車(喂
05/29 14:32, 39F
還有 37 則推文
05/29 16:47, , 77F
這隻養不好應該還有Tony Allen 吧...
05/29 16:47, 77F

05/29 16:50, , 78F
起碼也要會進攻的Allen 不然也太慘了
05/29 16:50, 78F

05/29 16:51, , 79F
不過第10很難選到禁區,Saric嗎?還是要McDermott,實在對
05/29 16:51, 79F

05/29 16:51, , 80F
不過Smart已經在攀升當中 我湖可能選不到了
05/29 16:51, 80F

05/29 16:51, , 81F
Gordon阿 他已經在下滑當中了 XD
05/29 16:51, 81F

05/29 16:51, , 82F
白人沒啥興趣...那個位置比較有可能是側翼或是後場
05/29 16:51, 82F

05/29 16:56, , 83F
前3號沒啥懸念,4-6會挑走Exum跟Smart..
05/29 16:56, 83F

05/29 16:56, , 84F
只能選 Gordon, Randle, Vonleh其中之一了
05/29 16:56, 84F

05/29 16:57, , 85F
這三支以Jim Buss的想法 一定是選最高那個
05/29 16:57, 85F

05/29 16:59, , 86F
拜託聰明哥掉下來阿
05/29 16:59, 86F

05/29 17:02, , 87F
比較好奇如果又買了一個首輪是想選誰..Payne?Kyle Anderson?
05/29 17:02, 87F

05/29 17:04, , 88F
搞不好選Gordon,然後在中段挑Ennis,前後場各補一個
05/29 17:04, 88F

05/29 17:05, , 89F
中段可以選到Ennis的話要給一個讚阿 但是有點奢求
05/29 17:05, 89F

05/29 17:22, , 90F
Ennis很不錯啊 看影片介紹根本是nash接班人 剛好來給本尊調教
05/29 17:22, 90F

05/29 17:26, , 91F
中段簽應該不好買 今年的中段也都還不錯
05/29 17:26, 91F

05/29 17:38, , 92F
你肯吃Boozer就有本錢騙一支來了 XD
05/29 17:38, 92F

05/29 17:39, , 93F
看來看去最可能的是 Gordon
05/29 17:39, 93F

05/29 17:43, , 94F
我也覺得不是Gordon 就是Smart了
05/29 17:43, 94F

05/29 17:46, , 95F
不過我總覺得Randle跟Vonleh都會在4-6之間走人...
05/29 17:46, 95F

05/29 17:54, , 96F
Gordon還不錯啦 他的防守也蠻吸引人的XD
05/29 17:54, 96F

05/29 18:09, , 97F
我是怕Smart的防守來到NBA 第一節打完就犯滿了
05/29 18:09, 97F

05/29 18:30, , 98F
等等 高控衛裡面有個看來跟本不像控衛吧
05/29 18:30, 98F

05/29 19:19, , 99F
是指Crawford不像?他剛進聯盟可是以高控衛備受期待喔
05/29 19:19, 99F

05/29 19:20, , 100F
還記得那年選秀會我看直播...萬萬沒想到事後看素質差成這樣
05/29 19:20, 100F

05/29 19:28, , 101F
不是素質差 是不會養 早期灰熊跟快艇養成超弱
05/29 19:28, 101F

05/29 21:09, , 102F
這簡單,阿不就年輕的老柯,只是老柯會進就是了...
05/29 21:09, 102F

05/30 00:27, , 103F
至少Randle會在7順位前應該跑不掉
05/30 00:27, 103F

05/30 08:24, , 104F
想選後場啊,可惡....
05/30 08:24, 104F

05/30 09:09, , 105F
想後場+1@@
05/30 09:09, 105F

05/30 09:16, , 106F
Randle和Vonleh都是前6被挑走,Smart跟Exum就一定會掉一個下來
05/30 09:16, 106F

05/30 09:25, , 107F
結果掉下來的全部都是前場
05/30 09:25, 107F

05/30 10:21, , 108F
沒差阿 我們啥都缺XD
05/30 10:21, 108F

05/30 10:42, , 109F
也是
05/30 10:42, 109F

05/30 12:00, , 110F
我們甚麼都缺 甚麼都需要阿XDDDDDDD
05/30 12:00, 110F

05/30 13:15, , 111F
但是湖人自己養成全明星等級的都是後場吧?
05/30 13:15, 111F

05/30 15:58, , 112F
Bynum:我曾是、我就是.湖人養的全明星又被自己人撞傷XD
05/30 15:58, 112F

05/30 16:00, , 113F
撞傷腿 頭腦也跟著壞了
05/30 16:00, 113F

05/30 16:01, , 114F
沒有吧他那個性一路走來始終如一阿XDD
05/30 16:01, 114F

05/31 12:13, , 115F
Bynum for 3!
05/31 12:13, 115F

06/01 01:44, , 116F
新人年命中率可望不到四成。
06/01 01:44, 116F
文章代碼(AID): #1JXg6mNR (Lakers)