[外電] Jodie Meeks
先看看反對聲音
LA Must Stay Far Away from Jodie Meeks
If the Los Angeles Laker sign free-agent guard Jodie Meeks then they will be
making a loud announcement to the basketball world that they have no idea
what the biggest weakness of this team is.
若Los Angeles Laker簽下自由球員Jodie,那等於是對這籃球世界大聲宣揚著,自己全然
不瞭解這支隊伍的最大弱點為何。
The reason this would be such a horrible signing for the Lakers has less to
do with Meeks and more to do with them. Meeks is a nice player. He is a
four-year veteran and has spent the last three seasons with the Philadelphia
76ers.
對Lakers而言,這筆簽約爛透的理由跟Meeks 沒有太大關係,重點是是內部因素。身為一
前三球季為Philadelphia 76ers打球的四年級生,Meeks是很好的選手。
In his time with the Sixers, Meeks has connected on 36.5 percent of his
three-point attempts. He is deadly on a pull-up or on the catch-and-shoot.
The shooting would be a nice addition for the Lakers as they have sorely
lacked the outside shooting needed to free up space for their bigs.
在Sixers打球的期間,Meeks有著36.5%的三分球命中率。他很擅長pull-up及
catch-and-shoot。若Lakers因缺乏外線而無法為禁區大個子清出空間,這樣的數據會
是很好的選擇。
While the shooting would be nice touch off the bench, offense is not going to
be this team's problem. Steve Nash will provide plenty of floor spacing for
this offense, and that offense is clearly set to be the team's strength.
當板凳能提供適當的外線,進攻便不是這支隊伍的主要問題了。Steve Nash會製造足夠空
檔,讓進攻變成這支隊伍的強項。
What the Lakers are not currently set to have is anyone who can stop an
opposing point guard from getting to the lane. At the end of last season, it
seemed impossible to think the Lakers could get worse in their ability to
defend point guards, but they did. For as big a plus as Steve Nash is on
offense, he is that much of a liability in man-to-man defense.
Lakers缺乏的是能有效阻擋對方PG切入禁區的角色。以Lakers的能力,在去年季末對於PG
的防守已經爛到令人不敢相信了,但事實證明,他們可以表現得更爛。Steve Nash為球隊
進攻大加分,對人盯人防守應該要試著進行補強。
Meeks is not a good defensive player, and he definitely is not suited to
guard point guards.
Meeks不是個好的防守球員,他無法防守PG。
The Lakers are well over the cap, and any player they add in free agency will
have to come via exceptions. This needs to be used on someone that can bring
a little defense to the point guard spot. This will allow the team to give a
different look, and throw someone in to disrupt the rhythm of an opposing
point guard before he shreds them to pieces.
Lakers已經沒有薪資空間了,他們需要能提供PG位置防守的球員。這將會使隊伍呈現不同
風貌,並在被撕裂防守前干擾進攻方的PG。(感謝black1108及sVs兩位的補充)
看完負面看正面
Jodie Meeks Would Be a Great Addition to the L.A. Bench
Signing Jodie Meeks would be a good move for the Los Angeles Lakers as they
look for more guards who can provide scoring off the bench.
對尋求板凳得分的Lakers來說,簽下Jodie Meeks會是很好的決定。
Meeks spent last season with the Philadelphia 76ers, but he wasn't as
consistent as the team would have liked. However, with a true point guard of
Steve Nash's caliber playing alongside him, Meeks would be able to thrive at
the offensive end of the floor.
Meeks上季為Philadelphia 76ers效力,但他無法有效融入球隊。然而,搭配上
Steven Nash這樣的頂級後衛,Meeks有能力強化其進攻火力。
Meeks can bring good size to the Lakers backcourt at 6'4", 200 pounds. Even
though his best position is shooting guard, he could also play point guard if
needed.
6'4"、200磅的Meeks,可以為Lakers的後場提供身材優勢。即使善於打SG,但若有需要,
亦能分攤PG的工作。
Meeks shot 40 percent from the field, 36 percent from beyond the arc, and
averaged 8.4 points per game last year for the 76ers. However, his most
impressive stat was his free-throw percentage, which was 90 percent. Meeks
can be relied on to make free throws in any situation, which is important for
any team.
Meeks有40%的命中率,在三分線外亦有36%的命中率,去年在76ers平均每場提供8.4分。
他最讓人驚訝的是罰球命中率有90%。Meeks在任何場合都有可信賴的罰球,這對任何隊伍
都是重要的。
With either Kobe Bryant or Steve Nash on the floor with him, Meeks would
likely get plenty of open shots every game.
不論是Kobe Bryant或Steven Nash與其搭配,Meeks都能有更好的空檔。
Meeks wouldn't play a major role on the Lakers, but he could certainly be an
important bench player. The Lakers would be smart to sign him as an
unrestricted free agent.
Meeks不會是Lakers的重點球員,但他絕對是重要的板凳戰力。簽下他,是湖人明智的決
定。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.38.234.66
推
07/09 11:07, , 1F
07/09 11:07, 1F
推
07/09 11:10, , 2F
07/09 11:10, 2F
→
07/09 11:11, , 3F
07/09 11:11, 3F
推
07/09 11:11, , 4F
07/09 11:11, 4F
推
07/09 11:13, , 5F
07/09 11:13, 5F
推
07/09 11:13, , 6F
07/09 11:13, 6F
推
07/09 11:14, , 7F
07/09 11:14, 7F
推
07/09 11:14, , 8F
07/09 11:14, 8F
→
07/09 11:15, , 9F
07/09 11:15, 9F
推
07/09 11:15, , 10F
07/09 11:15, 10F
→
07/09 11:16, , 11F
07/09 11:16, 11F
→
07/09 11:16, , 12F
07/09 11:16, 12F
→
07/09 11:17, , 13F
07/09 11:17, 13F
推
07/09 11:17, , 14F
07/09 11:17, 14F
→
07/09 11:17, , 15F
07/09 11:17, 15F
→
07/09 11:18, , 16F
07/09 11:18, 16F
→
07/09 11:19, , 17F
07/09 11:19, 17F
※ 編輯: lokiishere 來自: 114.38.238.105 (07/09 11:31)
推
07/09 11:53, , 18F
07/09 11:53, 18F
推
07/09 12:06, , 19F
07/09 12:06, 19F
推
07/09 12:09, , 20F
07/09 12:09, 20F
推
07/09 12:25, , 21F
07/09 12:25, 21F
推
07/09 13:07, , 22F
07/09 13:07, 22F
推
07/09 15:16, , 23F
07/09 15:16, 23F
推
07/09 22:44, , 24F
07/09 22:44, 24F
→
09/11 06:32, , 25F
09/11 06:32, 25F