[轉錄][外絮] Phoenix Suns to buy out Vince Carter

看板Lakers作者 (Justin Verlander 35 )時間13年前 (2011/06/20 15:55), 編輯推噓25(25推 0噓 38→)
留言63則, 28人參與, 5年前最新討論串1/1
※ [本文轉錄自 NBA 看板 #1D_kKxlc ] 作者: PaulDavis (Paul Davis) 看板: NBA 標題: [外絮] Phoenix Suns to buy out Vince Carter 時間: Mon Jun 20 14:14:16 2011 發現跟上篇來源重疊，補個新的外電。 Vince Carter got old. This isn't a particularly complicated reality. The explosive wing leaper whotook the NBA by storm a decade ago has entered that stage of his career where we all talk far more about his contract that his game. As a member of the Orlando Magic and Phoenix Suns in 2010-2011, Carter, 34, put up career-lows in every important category:28.1 minutes per game, 14.0 points per game, 12.2 shots per game, 2.4 free throws per game, 3.8 rebounds per game and 2.0 assists per game. 34歲VC在今年球季的各項數據都創下生涯新低。 包括平均上場時間28.1min、per game 14pts、12.2FGA、2.4FTA、3.8reb和2ast。 That's the bad news. The worse news?Carter is on the books for $18.9 million in the 2011-2012 season. 比起數據更糟的是：VC下一季的薪水高達1890萬美金。 But, wait, there's good news! That finalyear of his contract is only partially guaranteed. Rather than pay the agingwing scorer who is clearly in decline and was never much of a winner anyway,the Suns can simply buy out of his contract and be done with him. 還好，VC最後一年合約只有部分保障薪資。與其付錢給這個持續老化的球員， 太陽隊可以直接買斷他（用4百萬美金）就和他說莎唷娜啦。 The Arizona Republic reports that's exactly what the team plans to do. They won't trade Vince Carter's contract, opting instead to buy him out for $4 million in the coming days. 太陽表示不會交易VC的合約，而是自行買斷。 This is about as obvious as offseason moves get. The Suns are coming to terms with the fact that the Steve Nash era is ending and it's time for a massive youth movement. That almost alwaysrequires a liquidation of big contracts, and Carter's is by far the biggest on their books. Trading his salary would likely require Phoenix to take back mismatched parts or long-term salary commitments that would wind up slowing down the rebuilding process. Better to just be done with him and move on. 交易VC的合約可能會讓太陽又收到一些長約跟爛約， 有鑑於Nash時代即將結束，太陽需要好好重整他們的薪資空間。 What's in Carter's future? Well, he's reached the "Shaquille O'Neal 30+ Vagabond" stage of his career where he will need to hope someone, hopefully a contender, takes a chance on him as a scorer off the bench. VC的未來在哪裡？ 他到了上演歐尼爾晚年流浪記的階段， Will he be able to command more than the veteran's minimum? It's possible, but that could depend on what the new CBA looks like, as most ofthis year's contenders spent big to get there and won't be in the position to hand out additional contracts. There's a spot in this league for Carter still, but it's certainly not at center stage. Retirement can't be too far down the road. http://tinyurl.com/6z2l4wb -- 公牛小牛雷霆熱火賽爾提克，哪隊準備踏上魔術太陽的後塵呢？ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 217.150.52.37
→
06/20 14:15,
BOSTON +1
06/20 14:15
推
06/20 14:15,
波士頓養老大隊
06/20 14:15
推
06/20 14:16,
這樣表示太陽有1490萬薪資空間嗎?? 誰懂薪資的教一下
06/20 14:16
推
06/20 14:17,
SG的話........可能不會缺的樣子 (WEST有留的話)
06/20 14:17
→
06/20 14:20,
LA 和Kobe搭檔衝冠
06/20 14:20
推
06/20 14:21,
請小心使用到期約
06/20 14:21
→
06/20 14:22,
嘪斷後太陽薪資總額剩34M,薪資空間約20M
06/20 14:22
→
06/20 14:22,
這樣不表示太陽就有1490萬的空間
06/20 14:22
→
06/20 14:22,
不過這是用舊的CBA算的,新的會改怎樣不知道
06/20 14:22
推
06/20 14:23,
超賽用VC機會不高，防守洞太大..= =
06/20 14:23
推
06/20 14:25,
超塞最不需要的大概就是老將了 = =a
06/20 14:25
推
06/20 14:26,
其實C's還是可以收,VC是PP跟Ray最欠缺的2.3號替補
06/20 14:26
推
06/20 14:27,
薪資空間算法:薪資上限-球隊薪資總額
06/20 14:27
→
06/20 14:27,
安吉: 恩 底薪都來^^
06/20 14:27
→
06/20 14:28,
簽VC那Green要擺哪裡....?
06/20 14:28
→
06/20 14:28,
先發阿XD
06/20 14:28
→
06/20 14:28,
三個老頭輪流打32分鐘,完美 VC也很擅長帶領板凳大軍
06/20 14:28
→
06/20 14:28,
如果把Green放走那等於用Perkins換空氣,絕對被罵死
06/20 14:28
推
06/20 14:29,
嘪斷後太陽薪資總額剩34M←你是怎麼算的阿..?
06/20 14:29
→
06/20 14:29,
Green 還是打他的3.4號位置的替補 雖然有點浪費..
06/20 14:29
→
06/20 14:30,
安吉是說要好好栽培小綠了 先發是有80%可以確定的
06/20 14:30
→
06/20 14:30,
早點退休吧 再打下去只是被羞辱而已
06/20 14:30
→
06/20 14:31,
48M-(18M-4M)=34M 買斷的4M還是要算
06/20 14:31
→
06/20 14:32,
Green是有什麼魅力? 感覺算是先發跟替補遊走的等級
06/20 14:32
→
06/20 14:32,
如果放掉BBD,簽回Green,再給VC老將條款.. ㄎㄎ
06/20 14:32
推
06/20 14:32,
錯了 太陽今年沒有薪資空間
06/20 14:32
→
06/20 14:33,
r版友請用加的算算看太陽有的合約
06/20 14:33
→
06/20 14:34,
5號籤的魅力=.=
06/20 14:34
推
06/20 14:35,
那網站的48M本來就沒加VC的18M了 是要扣什麼?
06/20 14:35
推
06/20 14:35,
當Kobe替補似乎還可以
06/20 14:35
→
06/20 14:36,
48+4+新秀約 有空間才怪
06/20 14:36
→
06/20 14:36,
去老賽組昔日四巨頭也不錯
06/20 14:36
推
06/20 14:37,
好像去那隊都很難啊...重建的球隊??
06/20 14:37
→
06/20 14:38,
原來他48M沒含18M....那這樣的話明年薪資52M沒空間
06/20 14:38
推
06/20 14:40,
也不是52阿 要算薪資空間還要把新秀約先加進去
06/20 14:40
※ truegodchild:轉錄至看板 PHX-Suns 06/20 14:40
→
06/20 14:40,
借轉太陽版
06/20 14:40
→
06/20 14:42,
樓上講的沒錯,只是新秀約通常不大所以不用考慮
06/20 14:42
還有 44 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
06/20 18:34, , 24F
Ray在老賽中的防守是非常吃重的喔
06/20 18:34, 24F
推
06/20 18:39, , 25F
這樣數據真的有差不多嗎XDDD
06/20 18:39, 25F
推
06/20 18:50, , 26F
某r硬要凹實在難看，是要去看眼科嗎?哪裡差不多???
06/20 18:50, 26F
推
06/20 19:01, , 27F
肯中產以下 肯替補的話 vc超讚~
06/20 19:01, 27F
→
06/20 19:34, , 28F
太陽隊的體系外圍射手要適應不是這麼難
06/20 19:34, 28F
→
06/20 19:35, , 29F
只要你願意認真地跑位 跟海一樣大的空檔就會出來了
06/20 19:35, 29F
→
06/20 19:44, , 30F
根據我以前翻的一篇文章 太陽的空檔來自於三
06/20 19:44, 30F
→
06/20 19:45, , 31F
一．Nash滲透後的傳球 二．鋒線球員單打遭包夾的大對角
06/20 19:45, 31F
→
06/20 19:47, , 32F
傳球 三．攻守轉換的急停跳投
06/20 19:47, 32F
推
06/20 21:35, , 33F
想看他穿湖人球衣 然後再釋出
06/20 21:35, 33F
→
06/20 21:57, , 34F
不要吧 我覺得他帶賽
06/20 21:57, 34F
推
06/20 21:58, , 35F
如果可以老將合約拿下那有何妨 他在怎麼爛也是曾經半人半神
06/20 21:58, 35F
推
06/20 23:36, , 36F
等等，那種命中率差別哪來的差不多？|||
06/20 23:36, 36F
→
06/20 23:37, , 37F
但話說回來Raygun那是神級、VC只是掉回人界
06/20 23:37, 37F
推
06/20 23:53, , 38F
而且Raygun本來就是跳投當武器的 說和他差不多太扯
06/20 23:53, 38F
→
06/20 23:57, , 39F
拿 vc 比 RayGun 根本是在污辱雷槍，看看 Ray 在超賽犧牲的
06/20 23:57, 39F
→
06/20 23:57, , 40F
吧，從調整持球打法到完全走空手射手路線，後衛受傷又要負責
06/20 23:57, 40F
→
06/20 23:58, , 41F
去組織替補，現在還自願去擔任替補讓位年輕人先發，以前我還
06/20 23:58, 41F
→
06/20 23:58, , 42F
蠻不喜歡他的，但真的不得不佩服他。喔，對了，他不會手軟。
06/20 23:58, 42F
→
06/21 00:00, , 43F
當然有機會用部份中產簽 VC 是很不錯就是了。但期望他像 Ray
06/21 00:00, 43F
→
06/21 00:00, , 44F
一樣的效能就太豪洨了。
06/21 00:00, 44F
推
06/21 00:03, , 45F
VC來要打哪？
06/21 00:03, 45F
→
06/21 00:04, , 46F
說真的我已經對他沒啥印象了，都停留在最好的年代。
06/21 00:04, 46F
→
06/21 00:04, , 47F
自投自搶大車輪灌籃的時候......他應該也打不了1號吧？
06/21 00:04, 47F
推
06/21 01:05, , 48F
反正MB也不太常用純控衛，更常放兩個雙能衛甚至非控衛打後場
06/21 01:05, 48F
→
06/21 01:06, , 49F
Kobe先發Carter替補、或Kobe放一號、Carter放二號都不錯 XD
06/21 01:06, 49F
→
06/21 01:07, , 50F
Carter擔任得分後衛的防守其實還是有水準以上，就是進攻退化
06/21 01:07, 50F
→
06/21 01:07, , 51F
也不知道為什麼會突然退化成這樣....
06/21 01:07, 51F
推
06/21 01:10, , 52F
個人認為 VC不會甘願當Kobe的替補的
06/21 01:10, 52F
推
06/21 01:15, , 53F
而且他也不會願意拿兩百萬來打替補吧，去公牛先發機率更高
06/21 01:15, 53F
→
06/21 01:16, , 54F
一個準名人堂球員在怎麼退化，也比Keith Bogans強....
06/21 01:16, 54F
推
06/21 01:30, , 55F
VC要來 可以先發SF給他啊 MB拉去打SG替補 阿泰SF替補~
06/21 01:30, 55F
推
06/21 01:32, , 56F
Bogans會比較適合公牛吧,我滿期待他成為下一個Bowen的
06/21 01:32, 56F
推
06/21 01:33, , 57F
某人真的很凹 數據上明明就差一個檔次 被打臉打慣啦
06/21 01:33, 57F
→
06/21 01:34, , 58F
Bogans已經31歲，而且他的腦袋跟Bowen還是有點差距....XD
06/21 01:34, 58F
→
06/21 14:24, , 59F
VC不錯啦 1~3號都能支援 又比小AI便宜起碼50% 香濃掰~
06/21 14:24, 59F
→
08/08 13:59, , 60F
SG的話....... https://muxiv.com
08/08 13:59, 60F
→
09/11 05:34, , 61F
本來就是差不多,VC去 https://daxiv.com
09/11 05:34, 61F
→
12/11 20:21, 5年前 , 62F
//daxiv.com
12/11 20:21, 62F
→
12/11 20:21, 5年前 , 63F
12/11 20:21, 63F
‣ 更多 Verlander35 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1D_lprQs (Lakers)