Fw: [公告] "噁心"一詞往後之判決標準說明
※ [本文轉錄自 WomenTalk 看板 #1NohI2KI ]
作者: SnowAmy (小雪) 看板: WomenTalk
標題: [公告] "噁心"一詞往後之判決標準說明
時間: Sat Sep 3 19:31:12 2016
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 文章代碼(AID): #1NnP6h75 (L_TalkandCha) [ptt.cc] [宣判] student380 檢舉 │
│ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/L_TalkandCha/M.1472565675.A.1C5.html │
│ 這一篇文章值 0 Ptt幣 │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
> 3879 ! 8/30 GeminiMan □ [宣判] student380 檢舉 WomenTalk / Spell16 案
推
05/08 13:21,
05/08 13:21
推
,
依據小組長的裁決標準 此2句語意相近
亦即 "噁心" 一詞 視為攻擊行為事實
板主群以後的執法標準 將依此判例做出裁決
------------- 分 隔 線 --------------
人身攻擊定義為:指定人+攻擊言論
如:你(指原po)很噁心(攻擊言論)
但若為敘述行為或文章之內容則不算在此範圍。
(限當事者檢舉)
群體攻擊定義為:群體對象+攻擊言論
如:女生(族群)+都很噁心(群體攻擊)
(所有人都可以檢舉)
------------- 分 隔 線 --------------
往後針對人說 "噁心" 經當事者檢舉 板規2 30d
針對群體說 "噁心" 板規2 30d + 板規7 30d(引戰)
所有案件裁決不朔及既往
本篇公告於 2016/09/04 00:00:00 開始生效
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.225.80.11
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1472902274.A.512.html
→
09/03 19:31, , 1F
09/03 19:31, 1F
→
09/03 19:32, , 2F
09/03 19:32, 2F
噓
09/03 19:32, , 3F
09/03 19:32, 3F
→
09/03 19:32, , 4F
09/03 19:32, 4F
→
09/03 19:32, , 5F
09/03 19:32, 5F
→
09/03 19:32, , 6F
09/03 19:32, 6F
→
09/03 19:32, , 7F
09/03 19:32, 7F
噓
09/03 19:32, , 8F
09/03 19:32, 8F
噓
09/03 19:33, , 9F
09/03 19:33, 9F
推
09/03 19:34, , 10F
09/03 19:34, 10F
推
09/03 19:34, , 11F
09/03 19:34, 11F
→
09/03 19:34, , 12F
09/03 19:34, 12F
噓
09/03 19:34, , 13F
09/03 19:34, 13F
噓
09/03 19:34, , 14F
09/03 19:34, 14F
→
09/03 19:34, , 15F
09/03 19:34, 15F
噓
09/03 19:35, , 16F
09/03 19:35, 16F
噓
09/03 19:35, , 17F
09/03 19:35, 17F
→
09/03 19:36, , 18F
09/03 19:36, 18F
噓
09/03 19:37, , 19F
09/03 19:37, 19F
噓
09/03 19:37, , 20F
09/03 19:37, 20F
噓
09/03 19:38, , 21F
09/03 19:38, 21F
推
09/03 19:38, , 22F
09/03 19:38, 22F
→
09/03 19:39, , 23F
09/03 19:39, 23F
推
09/03 19:39, , 24F
09/03 19:39, 24F
→
09/03 19:39, , 25F
09/03 19:39, 25F
噓
09/03 19:39, , 26F
09/03 19:39, 26F
→
09/03 19:39, , 27F
09/03 19:39, 27F
噓
09/03 19:42, , 28F
09/03 19:42, 28F
噓
09/03 19:42, , 29F
09/03 19:42, 29F
噓
09/03 19:42, , 30F
09/03 19:42, 30F
→
09/03 19:44, , 31F
09/03 19:44, 31F
推
09/03 19:45, , 32F
09/03 19:45, 32F
噓
09/03 19:46, , 33F
09/03 19:46, 33F
推
09/03 19:48, , 34F
09/03 19:48, 34F
噓
09/03 19:49, , 35F
09/03 19:49, 35F
→
09/03 19:50, , 36F
09/03 19:50, 36F
還有 402 則推文
還有 1 段內文
噓
09/04 10:52, , 439F
09/04 10:52, 439F
噓
09/04 11:05, , 440F
09/04 11:05, 440F
噓
09/04 11:11, , 441F
09/04 11:11, 441F
噓
09/04 11:14, , 442F
09/04 11:14, 442F
噓
09/04 11:16, , 443F
09/04 11:16, 443F
噓
09/04 11:17, , 444F
09/04 11:17, 444F
噓
09/04 11:27, , 445F
09/04 11:27, 445F
噓
09/04 11:44, , 446F
09/04 11:44, 446F
→
09/04 11:44, , 447F
09/04 11:44, 447F
噓
09/04 11:45, , 448F
09/04 11:45, 448F
噓
09/04 11:53, , 449F
09/04 11:53, 449F
推
09/04 11:55, , 450F
09/04 11:55, 450F
推
09/04 12:01, , 451F
09/04 12:01, 451F
噓
09/04 12:15, , 452F
09/04 12:15, 452F
噓
09/04 12:22, , 453F
09/04 12:22, 453F
噓
09/04 12:27, , 454F
09/04 12:27, 454F
噓
09/04 12:31, , 455F
09/04 12:31, 455F
推
09/04 12:39, , 456F
09/04 12:39, 456F
噓
09/04 12:40, , 457F
09/04 12:40, 457F
噓
09/04 12:44, , 458F
09/04 12:44, 458F
噓
09/04 12:51, , 459F
09/04 12:51, 459F
噓
09/04 13:04, , 460F
09/04 13:04, 460F
噓
09/04 13:07, , 461F
09/04 13:07, 461F
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: xbearboy (1.34.140.127), 09/04/2016 13:20:04
→
09/04 13:21, , 462F
09/04 13:21, 462F
推
09/04 13:27, , 463F
09/04 13:27, 463F
→
09/04 13:28, , 464F
09/04 13:28, 464F
→
09/04 13:28, , 465F
09/04 13:28, 465F
→
09/04 13:29, , 466F
09/04 13:29, 466F
→
09/04 13:30, , 467F
09/04 13:30, 467F
→
09/04 13:31, , 468F
09/04 13:31, 468F
推
09/04 14:26, , 469F
09/04 14:26, 469F
推
09/04 14:38, , 470F
09/04 14:38, 470F
→
09/04 14:49, , 471F
09/04 14:49, 471F
→
09/04 14:52, , 472F
09/04 14:52, 472F
→
09/04 14:52, , 473F
09/04 14:52, 473F
推
09/04 14:52, , 474F
09/04 14:52, 474F
依據小組長的裁決標準 此2句語意相近
亦即 "噁心" 一詞 視為攻擊行為事實
小組長僅對兩個水桶案例作出解釋
且小組長的解釋比這兩句話還要完整
想問的是噁心一詞視為攻擊行為事實到底是如何得出的結論
小組長是否認同版主的解讀?
拿特別案例擴大解釋
這根本是無限上綱
※ 編輯: xbearboy (1.34.140.127), 09/04/2016 16:12:31
→
09/05 01:05, , 475F
09/05 01:05, 475F
→
09/05 13:03, , 476F
09/05 13:03, 476F