[建議] 申訴案主文及證據是否應不準修改?
說明:
申訴文章#1CmQyCID (L_BoyMeetsGi)
為主申訴文,但其申訴人於(10/25 06:48) 做其最後修改
且於原始主訴之關聯及證據性及影響心證有所差異,
見原始本文 (證一)
是否組務應明定申訴主文如有修改,其申訴程序必須重跑一次,
如同L_TalkandCha 中之證據文請勿修改。
且是否在對其他使用者做出指證時,
應於組務版上提出作為指證之證據?
否則正義公理之何在?
謝謝。
此致
男女大不同小組組務
--
The man who is a pessimist before 48 knows too much;
if he is an optimist after it, he knows too little.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.116.27.54
推
10/25 20:25, , 1F
10/25 20:25, 1F
→
10/25 20:33, , 2F
10/25 20:33, 2F
推
10/25 21:24, , 3F
10/25 21:24, 3F
→
10/25 21:34, , 4F
10/25 21:34, 4F
→
10/25 21:35, , 5F
10/25 21:35, 5F
→
10/25 21:36, , 6F
10/25 21:36, 6F
→
10/25 21:36, , 7F
10/25 21:36, 7F
推
10/27 04:03, , 8F
10/27 04:03, 8F
→
10/27 04:04, , 9F
10/27 04:04, 9F
→
10/27 04:04, , 10F
10/27 04:04, 10F
→
10/27 04:05, , 11F
10/27 04:05, 11F
→
10/27 04:05, , 12F
10/27 04:05, 12F
→
10/27 04:06, , 13F
10/27 04:06, 13F
→
10/27 04:06, , 14F
10/27 04:06, 14F
→
10/27 04:07, , 15F
10/27 04:07, 15F
→
10/27 04:08, , 16F
10/27 04:08, 16F
→
10/27 04:08, , 17F
10/27 04:08, 17F
→
10/27 04:09, , 18F
10/27 04:09, 18F
→
10/27 04:09, , 19F
10/27 04:09, 19F
推
10/27 04:11, , 20F
10/27 04:11, 20F