[外電] ESPN的專家談LIN 阿罵 還有一些事
http://espn.go.com/sportsnation/newyork/chat/_/id/44028
Chat with Jared Zwerling
說明:這一切都是JZ的訪談 不代表尼克官方
Q:Will the New York Knicks make a Selection in the 2012 NBA Draft?
A:They have the 48th pick and I think they would look to use it.
They've gotten two steals in the past two years, Landry Fields and Josh
Harrellson.
I think there will be some serviceable point guards and big men available
then.
球迷A:尼克2012有選秀權嗎?
JZ:"尼克2012擁有一個48順位的選秀權 過去兩年他們選中了LF跟肯胖
我認為他們今年會選個PG或一個大個子
Q:Chances Amare is traded?
A:Doubt it. Glen Grunwald sounded content with the guys he has now, based on
his feedback during a media conference call last week. I personally believe
Amare still has a lot left in him. Last year was difficult for him with the
lockout and his back injury, and during the season, he brother passed away. I
think with the offseason, set schedule ahead and his ability to interact with
the Knicks' trainers (which he couldn't do during the lockout), he'll return
strong next season. Of course, he needs a solid point guard to play with, and
I believe Jeremy Lin can develop into a very good one. A veteran pickup in
free agency who would either play in front of Lin or behind him (like a Jason
Kidd or Andre Miller) could also help.
球迷B:那麼有機會可以把阿罵交易出去嗎?
JZ:"我對此是抱持著懷疑的態度 從GG上禮拜談論的內容來看
我個人認為阿罵他的價值還是存在的 去年有很多不好的事發生在他身上
像是背傷拉 還有季中他哥哥的去世 我認為在休假期 設定一個行程讓他跟尼克的訓
員一起訓練一些時間 他下賽季將會回到生猛阿罵的狀態
當然 他需要一個穩定的PG跟他一起打球 我相信揪咪林可以進化到那地步的
也可以從自由球員裡找一個有經驗的老控衛來幫助阿罵
Q:The Knicks need multi skilled players. Too many guys on the roster only good
at one thing. In Free Agency I like Terrence Williams (passer, defender),
Nate Robinson (scorer, passer), Gerald Green (3 point shooter/slasher), and
John Lucas III (passer, 3 point shooter). What are the chances Knicks land
any of them?
A:I don't think Nate Robinson is what the Knicks need. He's more of a scorer
and the team needs more of a pure point guard to play alongside Lin, whether
that's a rookie, veteran or both. Gerald Green's agent wants to book his
client for more money this offseason and I don't see the Knicks having that.
John Lucas III I see returning to Chicago, especially because of Derrick
Rose's long-term injury. He played well in Chicago this past season. As for
Terrence Williams, he's still an intriguing prospect, even though he's been
in the league a few years. He has triple-double skills. I would say he's the
best bet out of all the guys you mentioned.
球迷C:尼克需要技能純熟的球員來幫助他們 我喜歡TW 小跳豆 小綠 魯卡斯三世
尼克有機會簽到他們嗎?
JC:"我不認為小跳豆是尼克需要的 他是一個專門得分的後衛
而尼克需要的是純PG來替補或搭檔LIN 無論是新秀還是老將 (助攻王跟BB:叫我囉?)
小綠想要更多的錢 尼克給不起 魯卡斯三世應該會回歸公牛 畢竟ROSE受了重傷
至於TW...我想他是你提到的人選裡面最好的一個!
Q:When has an NBA Player EVER taken less money to come to the Kniciks? Is this
idea that Steve Nash is gonna take half his quote to come to the Knicks a
pipe dream?
A:I would consider at this moment in time Steve Nash to be a pipe dream. I've
also heard from very reliable sources that he would probably not to want to
play in New York. The system as of now doesn't suit his style and the fact
that D'Antoni is gone adds to his desire not to play here.
球迷D:NASH是否願意拿較少的錢來尼克呢?
JC:我認為NASH來尼克根本是個白日夢 而且有可靠的消息來源指出NASH不想來紐約
Q:If the Knicks don't have to use their entire MLE to sign Jeremy Lin, any
chance they use the MLE on a veteran big like Kevin Garnett?
A:Kevin Garnett is an interesting candidate, but because he's played so well in
the second half of the season shows he's still got something left. I see him
demanding good money and wanting to start if he leaves Boston. With Amare in
New York, I'm not sure he'd want to come off the bench. I'd say he stays away.
球迷E:如果尼克沒有用他的全額中產去簽LIN 是否可以拿去簽KG呢?
JC:KG是個很有趣的選項 但因為他在下半季打很好 我認為如果他離開老賽
他會要求拿到更多的錢並且可以先發 而且我不認為他會願意打阿罵的替補
Q:Any chance the Knicks use their Stretch Exception on Amar'e and waive him
paying him half his salary over 6 years, instead of the remaining 3?
A:Not a possibility.
球迷F:請問尼克是否有機會買斷或特赦阿罵呢?
JC:不可能!
Q:Do you think the Knicks make any draft day trades? Amare or Douglas maybe?
A:I don't see Amare getting traded. As I mentioned earlier, Grunwald seems to
like the roster he has now and wants to build around it. Toney Douglas could
be trade bait for his shooting ability, but I doubt he'll be involved in a
straight-up trade. He's not that attractive right now to other teams.
球迷G:請問你認為尼克會不會做出交易 阿罵或TD?
JC:我並沒有看到阿罵可能被交易的消息 就跟我之前講的一樣 GG看起來很滿意現在
的陣容 他只想要依此來繼續補強 TD可能會被交易 但我懷疑他真的有那個吸引力
被其他隊買走嗎...?
Q:(鳥權討論)
JC:我很懷疑尼克真的能打贏這場官司嗎?
Q:討論阿罵瓜瓜拳王是否能共存
JC:在3月中旬 她們得到了6勝1敗的成績 他們必須做出更加一致的努力
看看軟豆怎麼幫助他們的前場的 我不是在說LIN可以像軟豆那樣
而是如果阿罵瓜瓜拳王更加尊重揪咪林 揪咪林的組織進攻應該可以幫助他們
更加容易的出手
Q:我只想知道TD未來會怎樣?
JC:目前沒聽到關於他的消息 GG在更早之前(可能季初吧= =)有說過他還是相信TD
TD現在能做到最棒的幫助就是進攻跟穩定的命中(今年濫掉了...)
Q:尼克有機會換到一輪末的選秀權嗎
JC:尼克沒有足夠的籌碼可以換到 我認為他們應該自己挑
第一輪末的順位並沒有那麼吸引人 第二輪的選秀 尼克已經做的很好了
也許他們今年能繼續下去...
太多了 我找重點翻
Q:will lin come back and be good next season?
A:Absolutely.
Q:揪咪林下一季會變更好回來嗎?
JC:絶對會!
Q:請問你有感覺到其他球隊是認真的想要簽下LIN 儘管尼克已經表示會盡全力留下LIN
是否其他隊仍有機會簽下LIN呢?
JC:尼克可以匹配任何的合約 我在重複一次任何的合約
GG已經說了他沒有去預設LIN會不在尼克
Q:看到馬刺現在的高位黨拆還有球的運動 請問你認為武僧會加入那些打法嗎?
還是他會堅持MELO ISO?
JC:YES 他有加入那些 瓜瓜應該受益於揪咪林的組織
但是武僧可能需要一個擅長進攻的助理教練 因為尼克現在的單打比率太高了
看看熱火吧 他們去年單打比率也很高 但他們今年配合的很好
Q:尼克有可能會失去LF嗎?我認為勇士可能可以給他一份不錯的合約
JC:我認為他會繼續待在紐約 GG上禮拜說了他想留下LIN跟LF
Q:Can lamar odom be a legit 6 man for the knicks?
球迷:ODOM可以成為尼克的第六人嗎?
JC:可以 他可以得分 搶籃板跟防守 在紐約 他將會是完美的
但我聽說他想要回洛杉磯
心評:這樣回頭來看GG當時的談話 看來應該是硬留LIN跟LF 放掉其他人?
--
─∥ ─── ◣ =◥"◥’. ∵ ◆∥ ψsherry821224 ──────────────
∥ ◤ ◥ ◤ ◥ ∥ ◤ ◢◤\ ◣◥ Teammates don't
∥ ╱ ∥◤ ̄◣ ﹍◣∥◤ ̄╲∥ ╱∥◤ ̄╲ ▼‵、λ﹀▼▼ play with each
∥◆◇ ∥ ∥∥◣∥ ∥╱ ∥◣_ ─-.╳ ︶- other, they play
∥ ╲ ∥ ∥∥ ∥ ∥ ╲ ◥∥▲ ρ\ `, ▲▲ FOR each other.
─∥ ╲ ∥ ∥∥ ∥◣_╱∥ ╲╲_◢∥ ◥ | ◢────────…‥.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.167.187.81
※ 編輯: lest83 來自: 118.167.187.81 (06/02 15:57)
推
06/02 16:01, , 1F
06/02 16:01, 1F
→
06/02 16:02, , 2F
06/02 16:02, 2F
→
06/02 16:03, , 3F
06/02 16:03, 3F
→
06/02 16:04, , 4F
06/02 16:04, 4F
→
06/02 16:05, , 5F
06/02 16:05, 5F
推
06/02 17:12, , 6F
06/02 17:12, 6F
→
06/02 17:14, , 7F
06/02 17:14, 7F
推
06/02 17:18, , 8F
06/02 17:18, 8F
→
06/02 17:18, , 9F
06/02 17:18, 9F
→
06/02 17:19, , 10F
06/02 17:19, 10F
→
06/02 17:20, , 11F
06/02 17:20, 11F
→
06/02 17:21, , 12F
06/02 17:21, 12F
→
06/02 17:22, , 13F
06/02 17:22, 13F
推
06/02 17:27, , 14F
06/02 17:27, 14F
→
06/02 17:28, , 15F
06/02 17:28, 15F
→
06/02 17:29, , 16F
06/02 17:29, 16F
→
06/02 17:30, , 17F
06/02 17:30, 17F
→
06/02 17:30, , 18F
06/02 17:30, 18F
推
06/02 17:40, , 19F
06/02 17:40, 19F
→
06/02 17:40, , 20F
06/02 17:40, 20F
→
06/02 17:41, , 21F
06/02 17:41, 21F
→
06/02 18:24, , 22F
06/02 18:24, 22F
→
06/02 18:25, , 23F
06/02 18:25, 23F
推
06/02 18:30, , 24F
06/02 18:30, 24F
→
06/02 19:09, , 25F
06/02 19:09, 25F
推
06/02 19:26, , 26F
06/02 19:26, 26F
推
06/02 19:55, , 27F
06/02 19:55, 27F
推
06/02 20:25, , 28F
06/02 20:25, 28F
→
06/02 20:25, , 29F
06/02 20:25, 29F
→
06/02 20:26, , 30F
06/02 20:26, 30F
→
06/02 20:26, , 31F
06/02 20:26, 31F
→
06/02 21:11, , 32F
06/02 21:11, 32F
→
06/02 21:11, , 33F
06/02 21:11, 33F
→
06/02 21:40, , 34F
06/02 21:40, 34F
→
06/02 21:41, , 35F
06/02 21:41, 35F
→
06/02 21:41, , 36F
06/02 21:41, 36F
推
06/02 21:42, , 37F
06/02 21:42, 37F
→
06/02 22:09, , 38F
06/02 22:09, 38F
→
06/02 22:09, , 39F
06/02 22:09, 39F
→
06/02 22:29, , 40F
06/02 22:29, 40F
推
06/02 22:34, , 41F
06/02 22:34, 41F
→
06/02 22:35, , 42F
06/02 22:35, 42F
→
06/02 22:35, , 43F
06/02 22:35, 43F
→
06/02 22:40, , 44F
06/02 22:40, 44F
→
06/02 22:41, , 45F
06/02 22:41, 45F
→
06/02 22:41, , 46F
06/02 22:41, 46F
→
06/02 23:03, , 47F
06/02 23:03, 47F
推
06/02 23:15, , 48F
06/02 23:15, 48F
推
06/03 00:39, , 49F
06/03 00:39, 49F
推
06/03 01:46, , 50F
06/03 01:46, 50F
推
06/03 01:51, , 51F
06/03 01:51, 51F
推
06/03 02:55, , 52F
06/03 02:55, 52F
→
06/03 19:55, , 53F
06/03 19:55, 53F
推
06/03 19:57, , 54F
06/03 19:57, 54F
→
06/03 19:57, , 55F
06/03 19:57, 55F
→
06/03 19:58, , 56F
06/03 19:58, 56F
→
06/03 19:58, , 57F
06/03 19:58, 57F
→
06/03 19:59, , 58F
06/03 19:59, 58F
推
06/03 20:01, , 59F
06/03 20:01, 59F
→
06/03 20:01, , 60F
06/03 20:01, 60F
→
06/03 20:03, , 61F
06/03 20:03, 61F
→
06/03 20:04, , 62F
06/03 20:04, 62F
→
06/03 20:04, , 63F
06/03 20:04, 63F
→
06/03 20:12, , 64F
06/03 20:12, 64F
→
06/03 20:14, , 65F
06/03 20:14, 65F
→
06/03 20:16, , 66F
06/03 20:16, 66F
→
06/03 20:16, , 67F
06/03 20:16, 67F
→
06/03 20:18, , 68F
06/03 20:18, 68F
推
06/03 20:18, , 69F
06/03 20:18, 69F
→
06/03 20:19, , 70F
06/03 20:19, 70F
推
06/03 20:21, , 71F
06/03 20:21, 71F
→
06/03 20:21, , 72F
06/03 20:21, 72F
→
06/03 20:22, , 73F
06/03 20:22, 73F
→
06/03 20:25, , 74F
06/03 20:25, 74F
→
06/03 20:51, , 75F
06/03 20:51, 75F
→
06/03 20:51, , 76F
06/03 20:51, 76F
推
06/04 10:04, , 77F
06/04 10:04, 77F
推
06/04 18:10, , 78F
06/04 18:10, 78F
→
06/04 20:16, , 79F
06/04 20:16, 79F
→
06/04 20:16, , 80F
06/04 20:16, 80F
推
06/04 21:49, , 81F
06/04 21:49, 81F
→
06/04 21:50, , 82F
06/04 21:50, 82F
→
06/04 21:50, , 83F
06/04 21:50, 83F