[外電] 武僧從失敗中看到了一些好的東西
Woodson sees good things from Knicks failure
http://ppt.cc/xK35
“Making the first round of the playoffs and getting eliminated, that's not
fun for anybody,” Woodson admitted yesterday.
“But this was a positive season.
If we didn't make the playoffs it would have been really ugly.”
武僧說在第一輪被淘汰 這對每個人來說都不是有趣的 但這是一個很積極的賽季!
如果我們沒有進到季後賽 這更讓人覺得慘"
Nonetheless, Woodson did enough to keep his job and all signs point to him
being given the chance to lead the Knicks through a full training camp and
regular schedule.
雖然武僧還沒獲得續約 但總總跡象都顯示他將會獲得帶領尼克一個完整的訓練謍的機會
武僧說他想相信尼克最後會如何 如果可以保持一段建健康康的穩定的陣容
這將會是很有趣的
記者說尼克該改變進攻的模式 傷兵雖然是一種原因 但現在基本上尼克就是做給瓜瓜去打
如果瓜瓜不能 就換成JR 也說武僧必須弄清楚 LIN是否是控衛這位子的永久解答!
Still, Woodson said his Big Three has to improve, specifying he wants
Stoudemire to develop a legit post game and Chander, also.
He wants Anthony in better shape and with the mindset of making teammates
better.
這裡好像是在說武僧希望阿罵跟拳王能增加點背框?
然後他還是希望瓜瓜能有更好的狀況(體態?)還有可以更幫助隊友點!
總之他是說這三個人可以更強!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Knicks have Lin-gering question at point guard
http://ppt.cc/!S,3
這篇開頭是說LIN膝蓋的傷 然後說或許他可以改變尼克現在單調的進攻
也因為LIN的最後六個禮拜的缺席只稍微改變了一點點2012的尼克
或許他可能更深刻的改變2013之後的尼克
If the Heat series proved anything, it's that the Knicks can't survive
without a capable NBA point guard.
記者說如果對熱火的系列賽有證明甚麼 那就是尼克不能沒有堪用的PG!
他說阿罵跟拳王都需要一個PG來引導他們 而瓜瓜當然也需要控衛來幫助他
記者說NASH是名人堂球員 如果他可以來為何不呢
但是現實面是他在別的地方可以拿到更多的錢 或是有一隊更接近冠軍的球隊
也或許可以去跟冷笑話團聚 總之就是在說尼克不要幻想那麼多
現在讓我們再回來看看LIN
Even before his knee betrayed him, the NBA had started to catch up to him,
and this is what we learned: he probably wasn't going to be the greatest
point guard in the game's history, and he wasn'ta D-Leaguer.
當他二月爆發後 在幾個禮拜內成了地球上最受歡迎的球員 然後迅速消失
雖然他的膝蓋背叛了他 但NBA已經開始去適應他習慣他了 這讓我們學到了甚麼
他可能不會是歷史上最偉大的控衛 也不會是發展聯盟的球員
He was somewhere in between.
他介於這兩者之間
那LIN可以做到甚麼?
這裡作者舉了一個例子 他說去年MLB大都會隊有一個人跟LIN很像 那個人被認定
需要完整的一年來觀察看看他是否是建隊基石 但一年過去了他的打擊率卻只有0.179...
(這裡應該是說大都會賭失敗了)
Maybe Davis still will justify the Mets' faith.
It is almost certain Lin is going to force the Knicks to make a similar
decision based on an similarly sparse sample size, because they simply can't
have what they had at the beginning of the year with Toney Douglas, or at the
end with the calcifying Davis/Mike Bibby tag team: non-competitiveness at the
point.
也許DAVIS(就他剛說的那個人)還是可以證明大都會的信心
現在LIN也將迫使尼克去做類似的決定 基於那些不夠多的成績樣本
因為TD季初證明他不行 還有季末BD跟BB的老化也沒辦法讓球隊有競爭力
Lin is the chalk pick.They can guarantee his presence, which is something
they can't do with Nash,
and something they shouldn't do with the pedestrian pool of point guards
likely to be available.
LIN是個受限制的自由球員 尼克可以保證他的留下 這就是他們不能對NASH做的
(無法保證NASH一定會來)
至於LIN是不是控衛這點最好的解答 作者說:這是現在不可能知道的
問題在於 尼克知道他們有能力可以留下他 還有他們知道LIN是現階段最好的選擇
另外一篇則是在問尼克現在的計畫是甚麼
因為之前華許跟冷笑話的重建計畫已經因為瓜瓜交易案而被打亂了並且不在了
最後則是說如果沒有瓜瓜交易案現在的尼克會是怎樣呢?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
看到最後一句忽然想到如果沒有瓜瓜交易案
在外加今年簽拳王的話
那可能陣容是 肥頓/咖哩那裡/W.錢德勒/阿罵/拳王
替補則有LF/香波/JJ 好像也不差欸0.0
不過瓜瓜也是有他的優點的拉>.^
從另外一面想沒有瓜瓜交易案也不會有LIN了
還是希望明年加油吧
--
─∥ ─── ◣ =◥"◥’. ∵ ◆∥ ψsherry821224 ──────────────
∥ ◤ ◥ ◤ ◥ ∥ ◤ ◢◤\ ◣◥ Teammates don't
∥ ╱ ∥◤ ̄◣ ﹍◣∥◤ ̄╲∥ ╱∥◤ ̄╲ ▼‵、λ﹀▼▼ play with each
∥◆◇ ∥ ∥∥◣∥ ∥╱ ∥◣_ ─-.╳ ︶- other, they play
∥ ╲ ∥ ∥∥ ∥ ∥ ╲ ◥∥▲ ρ\ `, ▲▲ FOR each other.
─∥ ╲ ∥ ∥∥ ∥◣_╱∥ ╲╲_◢∥ ◥ | ◢────────…‥.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.167.180.202
※ 編輯: lest83 來自: 118.167.180.202 (05/11 23:33)
推
05/11 23:37, , 1F
05/11 23:37, 1F
推
05/11 23:37, , 2F
05/11 23:37, 2F
→
05/11 23:39, , 3F
05/11 23:39, 3F
※ 編輯: lest83 來自: 118.167.180.202 (05/11 23:39)
推
05/11 23:39, , 4F
05/11 23:39, 4F
推
05/11 23:42, , 5F
05/11 23:42, 5F
推
05/12 00:04, , 6F
05/12 00:04, 6F
推
05/12 00:08, , 7F
05/12 00:08, 7F
推
05/12 00:11, , 8F
05/12 00:11, 8F
→
05/12 00:12, , 9F
05/12 00:12, 9F
→
05/12 00:13, , 10F
05/12 00:13, 10F
推
05/12 00:24, , 11F
05/12 00:24, 11F
推
05/12 00:33, , 12F
05/12 00:33, 12F
推
05/12 00:39, , 13F
05/12 00:39, 13F
→
05/12 00:40, , 14F
05/12 00:40, 14F
推
05/12 00:41, , 15F
05/12 00:41, 15F
推
05/12 00:45, , 16F
05/12 00:45, 16F
→
05/12 00:46, , 17F
05/12 00:46, 17F
→
05/12 00:46, , 18F
05/12 00:46, 18F
→
05/12 00:47, , 19F
05/12 00:47, 19F
→
05/12 00:49, , 20F
05/12 00:49, 20F
→
05/12 00:49, , 21F
05/12 00:49, 21F
→
05/12 00:52, , 22F
05/12 00:52, 22F
推
05/12 00:52, , 23F
05/12 00:52, 23F
→
05/12 00:52, , 24F
05/12 00:52, 24F
→
05/12 00:53, , 25F
05/12 00:53, 25F
→
05/12 00:53, , 26F
05/12 00:53, 26F
→
05/12 00:53, , 27F
05/12 00:53, 27F
→
05/12 00:54, , 28F
05/12 00:54, 28F
→
05/12 00:55, , 29F
05/12 00:55, 29F
推
05/12 00:55, , 30F
05/12 00:55, 30F
推
05/12 00:56, , 31F
05/12 00:56, 31F
沒有槍西不代表沒有拳王喔 但沒有瓜瓜交易案是肯定不會有LIN就是了
推
05/12 00:56, , 32F
05/12 00:56, 32F
推
05/12 00:56, , 33F
05/12 00:56, 33F
→
05/12 00:57, , 34F
05/12 00:57, 34F
推
05/12 00:57, , 35F
05/12 00:57, 35F
推
05/12 00:57, , 36F
05/12 00:57, 36F
推
05/12 00:58, , 37F
05/12 00:58, 37F
還有 191 則推文
還有 1 段內文
→
05/12 02:00, , 229F
05/12 02:00, 229F
推
05/12 02:00, , 230F
05/12 02:00, 230F
→
05/12 02:01, , 231F
05/12 02:01, 231F
→
05/12 02:02, , 232F
05/12 02:02, 232F
→
05/12 02:02, , 233F
05/12 02:02, 233F
→
05/12 02:02, , 234F
05/12 02:02, 234F
→
05/12 02:03, , 235F
05/12 02:03, 235F
推
05/12 02:04, , 236F
05/12 02:04, 236F
推
05/12 02:04, , 237F
05/12 02:04, 237F
→
05/12 02:04, , 238F
05/12 02:04, 238F
→
05/12 02:06, , 239F
05/12 02:06, 239F
→
05/12 02:06, , 240F
05/12 02:06, 240F
→
05/12 02:07, , 241F
05/12 02:07, 241F
推
05/12 02:07, , 242F
05/12 02:07, 242F
→
05/12 02:07, , 243F
05/12 02:07, 243F
推
05/12 02:46, , 244F
05/12 02:46, 244F
→
05/12 02:47, , 245F
05/12 02:47, 245F
→
05/12 02:47, , 246F
05/12 02:47, 246F
→
05/12 02:48, , 247F
05/12 02:48, 247F
推
05/12 02:48, , 248F
05/12 02:48, 248F
→
05/12 02:49, , 249F
05/12 02:49, 249F
推
05/12 02:51, , 250F
05/12 02:51, 250F
→
05/12 02:52, , 251F
05/12 02:52, 251F
→
05/12 02:52, , 252F
05/12 02:52, 252F
推
05/12 03:00, , 253F
05/12 03:00, 253F
推
05/12 09:47, , 254F
05/12 09:47, 254F
推
05/12 09:49, , 255F
05/12 09:49, 255F
推
05/12 09:49, , 256F
05/12 09:49, 256F
→
05/12 09:50, , 257F
05/12 09:50, 257F
→
05/12 09:51, , 258F
05/12 09:51, 258F
→
05/12 12:36, , 259F
05/12 12:36, 259F
推
05/12 13:13, , 260F
05/12 13:13, 260F
推
05/12 13:25, , 261F
05/12 13:25, 261F
推
05/12 13:28, , 262F
05/12 13:28, 262F
→
05/12 13:51, , 263F
05/12 13:51, 263F
推
05/12 14:43, , 264F
05/12 14:43, 264F
推
05/12 15:35, , 265F
05/12 15:35, 265F
→
05/12 15:38, , 266F
05/12 15:38, 266F
→
05/12 15:42, , 267F
05/12 15:42, 267F
推
05/12 23:59, , 268F
05/12 23:59, 268F