[閒聊] 如果將尼克隊這樣分成兩個team呢?
大家都說Anthony的單打能力很強,但防守是個洞
那何不利用這個點來組成另類的兩組呢?
以Anthony為中心利用他的單打能力配上防守能力較強的隊員
如Shumpert Chandler Jeffries BD(因為Lin相對防守較弱所以把BD放在這裡)
另外一隊則是以Lin為中心主打團隊合作的隊員
如Novak Fields Chandler Stoudemire(因為不能同時有兩個洞所以把阿罵放這裡)
其他不在此的隊員則可以互相調配遞補等等
主要是 一個單打強配其他防守較強 與 主打團隊合作 的這兩種想法來分組
這樣兩組的都有得分能力洞也不會太大
至於誰是防守能力較強者或適合打團隊合作者
身為一月球迷的我說實在的還不大清楚 分析錯請見諒!!
大家覺得這樣有可行性嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.164.4.200
推
03/10 20:27, , 1F
03/10 20:27, 1F
推
03/10 20:27, , 2F
03/10 20:27, 2F
推
03/10 20:28, , 3F
03/10 20:28, 3F
推
03/10 20:29, , 4F
03/10 20:29, 4F
推
03/10 20:30, , 5F
03/10 20:30, 5F
※ 編輯: cshmggyy 來自: 218.164.4.200 (03/10 20:31)
→
03/10 20:31, , 6F
03/10 20:31, 6F
推
03/10 20:35, , 7F
03/10 20:35, 7F
→
03/10 20:52, , 8F
03/10 20:52, 8F
推
03/10 20:53, , 9F
03/10 20:53, 9F
→
03/10 20:53, , 10F
03/10 20:53, 10F
→
03/10 20:54, , 11F
03/10 20:54, 11F
推
03/10 20:58, , 12F
03/10 20:58, 12F
→
03/10 20:58, , 13F
03/10 20:58, 13F
→
03/10 20:58, , 14F
03/10 20:58, 14F
推
03/10 21:05, , 15F
03/10 21:05, 15F
推
03/10 21:06, , 16F
03/10 21:06, 16F
→
03/10 21:07, , 17F
03/10 21:07, 17F
→
03/10 21:07, , 18F
03/10 21:07, 18F
→
03/10 21:15, , 19F
03/10 21:15, 19F
推
03/10 21:19, , 20F
03/10 21:19, 20F
推
03/10 21:23, , 21F
03/10 21:23, 21F
→
03/10 21:25, , 22F
03/10 21:25, 22F
推
03/10 21:25, , 23F
03/10 21:25, 23F
→
03/10 21:26, , 24F
03/10 21:26, 24F
→
03/10 21:27, , 25F
03/10 21:27, 25F
→
03/10 21:27, , 26F
03/10 21:27, 26F
→
03/10 21:27, , 27F
03/10 21:27, 27F
推
03/10 21:28, , 28F
03/10 21:28, 28F
→
03/10 21:28, , 29F
03/10 21:28, 29F
→
03/10 21:31, , 30F
03/10 21:31, 30F
→
03/10 21:32, , 31F
03/10 21:32, 31F
→
03/10 21:33, , 32F
03/10 21:33, 32F
推
03/10 21:33, , 33F
03/10 21:33, 33F
→
03/10 21:33, , 34F
03/10 21:33, 34F
→
03/10 21:34, , 35F
03/10 21:34, 35F
→
03/10 21:34, , 36F
03/10 21:34, 36F
→
03/10 21:35, , 37F
03/10 21:35, 37F
→
03/10 21:36, , 38F
03/10 21:36, 38F
還有 53 則推文
推
03/10 22:19, , 92F
03/10 22:19, 92F
推
03/10 22:26, , 93F
03/10 22:26, 93F
推
03/10 22:27, , 94F
03/10 22:27, 94F
推
03/10 22:28, , 95F
03/10 22:28, 95F
→
03/10 22:28, , 96F
03/10 22:28, 96F
推
03/10 22:29, , 97F
03/10 22:29, 97F
→
03/10 22:30, , 98F
03/10 22:30, 98F
→
03/10 22:31, , 99F
03/10 22:31, 99F
推
03/10 22:34, , 100F
03/10 22:34, 100F
推
03/10 22:41, , 101F
03/10 22:41, 101F
→
03/10 22:42, , 102F
03/10 22:42, 102F
推
03/10 22:44, , 103F
03/10 22:44, 103F
→
03/10 22:45, , 104F
03/10 22:45, 104F
推
03/10 22:46, , 105F
03/10 22:46, 105F
推
03/10 22:47, , 106F
03/10 22:47, 106F
推
03/10 22:47, , 107F
03/10 22:47, 107F
→
03/10 22:49, , 108F
03/10 22:49, 108F
推
03/10 22:50, , 109F
03/10 22:50, 109F
→
03/10 22:51, , 110F
03/10 22:51, 110F
→
03/10 22:51, , 111F
03/10 22:51, 111F
推
03/10 22:52, , 112F
03/10 22:52, 112F
→
03/10 22:53, , 113F
03/10 22:53, 113F
推
03/10 22:57, , 114F
03/10 22:57, 114F
推
03/10 22:59, , 115F
03/10 22:59, 115F
→
03/10 22:59, , 116F
03/10 22:59, 116F
推
03/10 23:00, , 117F
03/10 23:00, 117F
→
03/10 23:00, , 118F
03/10 23:00, 118F
推
03/10 23:01, , 119F
03/10 23:01, 119F
→
03/10 23:02, , 120F
03/10 23:02, 120F
推
03/10 23:07, , 121F
03/10 23:07, 121F
→
03/10 23:09, , 122F
03/10 23:09, 122F
推
03/10 23:32, , 123F
03/10 23:32, 123F
推
03/10 23:32, , 124F
03/10 23:32, 124F
推
03/10 23:33, , 125F
03/10 23:33, 125F
推
03/11 01:46, , 126F
03/11 01:46, 126F
→
03/11 01:47, , 127F
03/11 01:47, 127F
→
03/11 01:48, , 128F
03/11 01:48, 128F
→
03/11 01:49, , 129F
03/11 01:49, 129F
推
03/11 10:06, , 130F
03/11 10:06, 130F
→
03/11 10:07, , 131F
03/11 10:07, 131F