[外電] Rapid Reaction: Spurs 118, Knicks 105
Rapid Reaction: Spurs 118, Knicks 105
來源：http://0rz.tw/C4Jvw
WHAT IT MEANS: Was this really the Knicks' 39th game of the
season? They arrived at the AT&T Center Wednesday night like it
was their first time playing together, showing no cohesion on
offense and looking lost on defense.
這真的是尼克本季第39場比賽？
禮拜三晚上在AT&T中心的比賽，尼克表現得像是他們第一次聚在一起打球，
進攻沒有凝聚力，而防守掉鍊子。
The Knicks were sorely missing Tyson Chandler's interior defense
-- he missed his first game of the season with a hamstring strain
-- which could have interfered more with Spurs point guard Tony
Parker, who scored a game-high 32 points. But overall, they
didn't put up much of a fight. They dropped their third straight
game on the road, and now stand three games below .500 (18-21)
and remain the eighth seed in the East.
拳王因傷無法上場，這是他本季第一次缺席，而尼克眾將想死他了。
TP本場比賽得分獲32分新高，拳王是唯一有可能阻礙他的人。
但整個來說，這場比賽尼克沒怎麼能抵抗，這是客場第三場連敗，
現在勝率已經跌破5成，但仍保持東區第八種子的位置。
TURNING POINT: When Parker stepped on the court. The Knicks had
no answer for the Spurs point guard -- a similar situation to
Sunday against the Celtics (Rajon Rondo). Parker scored eight of
his first 10 points in the paint in the first quarter, and
finished the first half with 23 as the Spurs led 58-41. The
Knicks made a 11-2 run towards the end of the fourth quarter,
after being down 24 in the second half, but the Spurs' Big Three
of Parker, Manu Ginobili (17 points and six assists off the
bench) and Tim Duncan (17 points and eight rebounds) were too
much for the Knicks.
轉折點：小跑車上場奔馳時。
尼克完全束手無策，就像禮拜天對Rondo一樣無能為力。
第一節TP在禁區投十中八，並且帶領馬刺上半場以58-41領先。
尼克第三節落後24後，打出一波11-2的攻勢，
但是馬刺的三巨頭，TP(17分6助攻)和TD(17分8籃板)徹底灌爆尼克。
THE BAD: 1) The Knicks' defense was a disaster tonight,
especially guarding the Spurs' pick-and-roll featuring Parker.
They showed no pressure and rotated poorly, providing no help
defense. Midway through the second quarter, the Spurs had 22
points in the paint, and by that point Chandler and Jared
Jeffries' absence was more than evident.
問題點：
1) 尼克的防守是場災難，尤其是防守Parker主導的P&R時。
不壓迫、輪轉得很差、彼此也不互相協助，光第二節馬刺就在禁區予取予求了22分。
更顯得拳王和JJ有多麼重要。
2) The Knicks were out of sync offensively tonight. While Carmelo
Anthony rebounded well from Tuesday night's six-point performance
with 27 points, all the other Knicks were quiet. While the Spurs
shot 54.1 percent, the Knicks' accuracy was only 42.7 percent.
2) 進攻一盤散沙。
當Melo跌深反彈得了27分時，尼克其他球員卻靜悄悄的。
馬刺的命中率有54.1%，而尼克只有43.7%。
3) More specifically, the Knicks took too many jumpshots, mostly
by Melo, who shot 12-for-24 from the field. Jeremy Lin wasn't
able to get into the lane to generate kickouts and ball movement
to open shooters. Case in point: Lin only had four assists and
Steve Novak, who was on a tear lately, only had one 3-pointer.
3) 更準確一點地說，尼克嘗試太多次跳投，這些大部分是Melo貢獻的，
但他的命中率是12-24。Lin沒辦法把球傳導到有空檔的射手。
（Lin指右四次助攻，而最近手感火熱的Novak只投進一顆三分）
THE GOOD: 1) The Knicks' defense-to-transition opportunities.
They were able to convert many of their 12 steals (Lin had three)
into fast-break points (24 compared to the Spurs' 11).
好的一面：
1) 尼克的防守反擊機會。
12次的抄截（Lin包辦3次）能順利轉化為得快攻得分（24分而馬刺只有11分）
2.) While Lin struggled with his floor game, Baron Davis had
another strong showing, dishing out eight assists. If he was
scoring points (he had none), the debate about who should be
starting, Lin or Davis, would be heating up.
2) 當Lin還在掙扎著組織進攻，BD能跳出來送出8次助攻。
如果他今天得分的話，到底哪個PG能先發的議題又將再次引起討論。
3.) With Iman Shumpert in the starting lineup, replacing Landry
Fields, and Novak not getting his usual open looks, J.R. Smith
picked up the slack off the bench. He had his best performance
with the Knicks, scoring 18 points on 6-for-12 shooting (four
3-pointers).
3) 香波代替Fields先發，JR取代Novak獲得更多上場機會。
JR交出來到尼克後最佳的成績單，18分（6-12，其中4顆是3分球）
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 101.12.106.211
推
03/08 20:22, , 1F
03/08 20:22, 1F
→
03/08 21:11, , 2F
03/08 21:11, 2F
→
03/08 21:12, , 3F
03/08 21:12, 3F
推
03/08 21:21, , 4F
03/08 21:21, 4F
推
03/08 21:29, , 5F
03/08 21:29, 5F
推
03/08 21:55, , 6F
03/08 21:55, 6F
推
03/08 22:01, , 7F
03/08 22:01, 7F
→
03/08 22:02, , 8F
03/08 22:02, 8F
→
03/08 22:05, , 9F
03/08 22:05, 9F
推
03/08 22:31, , 10F
03/08 22:31, 10F
推
03/08 23:00, , 11F
03/08 23:00, 11F
推
03/08 23:29, , 12F
03/08 23:29, 12F
→
03/08 23:30, , 13F
03/08 23:30, 13F
→
03/08 23:30, , 14F
03/08 23:30, 14F
推
03/08 23:54, , 15F
03/08 23:54, 15F
→
03/08 23:57, , 16F
03/08 23:57, 16F
推
03/09 00:08, , 17F
03/09 00:08, 17F