Re: [閒聊] Finally, a Definitive Answer on Jeremy

看板Knicks作者MOJS (跟鄉民進來看熱鬧的)時間14年前 (2012/02/15 23:03)推噓8(8推 0噓 10→)

留言18則, 7人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

※ 引述《Joba07 (騙人布)》之銘言： : http://knickerblogger.net/finally-a-definitive-answer-on-jeremy- lins-contract-status/ : While it pains me to basically just re-post what I originally posted five : days ago before I was convinced to edit my original piece, now that we have : apparently as definitive of an answer on the topic as we’re going to get : from the great Howard Beck from the New York Times, I figured it made sense : to share the situation (which, again, has finally been verified by Beck). 這是篇以查證過的消息。 : Here, then, is the contract status for Jeremy Lin… 有關Lin得合約。 : Lin is not eligible for so-called “Early Bird Rights,” which means a player 我們沒有他的沒有早鳥權。早鳥權，在球隊打至少超過兩年的球員才能擁有，這個權力可以隨著交易轉移到別隊。 : that has played for a team for at least two years. In the NBA CBA, you can : transfer your Bird Rights if you were traded from one team to another. So if : Lin had been traded from the Golden State Warriors to the Knicks, the Knicks 所以如果Lin是從勇士隊交易過來的話，我們會擁有的他早鳥權。然而，他被勇士隊給釋出了，早鳥權限的計算在此同時被重置。 : would have his “Early Bird Rights.” However, since he was waived by the : Warriors, as soon as he was waived, his Bird Rights reset. Therefore, Lin : counts only as having played for the Knicks for one single season. : Landry Fields, having played for the Knicks for two years, has “Early Bird : Rights.” What it basically comes down is that the Knicks are allowed to go : over the cap to pay Fields anything up to the average salary (which is Fields在尼克打了兩年，所以我們有他的早鳥權，我們可以在不受薪資空間限制下，對他續約，薪水約是500萬鎂。 : roughly $5 million). Since Lin has no Early Bird Rights, the Knicks are not : allowed to go over the cap to re-sign him (besides a general raise of paying : him 125% of his current salary – this is an exception available to all free : agents in the NBA. Their current team can offer them a raise for the next : season of 120% of their current salary. For Lin that’d be roughly $1 million : (it is 125% for Lin since he is a restricted free agent, and your qualifying : offer for a restricted free agent has to be at least 125% of the player’s : current salary, so that is the bare minimum the Knicks can offer Lin for next : season – that extra 5% is no chump change). 尼克並沒有Lin的早鳥權，所以在薪資帽的限制下尼克無法對他續約，除非使用一個例外條款，不過這個例外條款並沒有什麼吸引力。 : Since the Knicks will be over the $58 million salary cap this offseason but : under the $70 million luxury cap, the Knicks will have access to both of the : major exceptions. The Bi-Annual Exception (which is roughly $2 million and : available, naturally enough, every other year – so long as you’re over the : cap and under the luxury cap) and the Mid-Level Exception, which is roughly 尼克明年的薪資將會超過薪資帽但是低於豪華稅門檻，因此有兩個例外條款，約200萬的雙年條款和約500萬的中產條款。 : $5 million (available every year, provided you are over the cap and under the : luxury cap). They can pay Lin under either of the two. : Where the Knicks luck out is the fact that both Lin and Fields, since they’ : re coming off their initial two-year contracts (while the Knicks did not gain : Lin’s Early Bird Rights, they at least did inherit his original two-year : contract), they are both restricted free agents this year. Not only that, but : they are governed by the so-called “Gilbert Arenas Provision.” This limits : the amount of money other teams can offer either Lin or Fields to a maximum : starting salary of the average NBA salary (roughly $5 million). 而因為Arenas條款，其他球隊只能開給Fiedls和Lin約500萬中產的起薪。 : Since the Knicks own Fields’ Early Bird Rights, they can match any offer : without having to use their mid-level exception. However, since Lin does not : have Early Bird Rights, the Knicks would have to dip into their exceptions : (and almost certainly the mid-level) to match any offer sheet for Lin. : So the good news is that the Knicks are guaranteed to be able to keep both : Fields and Lin if they want to. The bad news is that if anyone makes an offer : of over $2 million to Lin, the Knicks would have to dip into their mid-level : exception to pay for it, therefore effectively nullifying the MLE as a tool : to sign a good free agent (like, say, Steve Nash). So they might be in a : situation where they would have to choose between Nash and Lin. Who would you : choose? 而因為我們有Fields的早鳥權，所以我們可以不動用例外條款續約他，但是如果有人開給Lin超過200萬鎂的合約時，我們就需要動用我們的中產來簽下他。 : One tricky aspect of the Gilbert Arenas Provision is that teams could still : sign Lin to deals bigger than just the MLE times however many years (like 4 : years/$20 million), they just can’t have the first two years be larger than : the MLE so that the Knicks cannot be outbid. The first year has to be for $5 : million. However, if a team is, say, $11 million under the cap, they can : offer Lin a 4 year/$44 million contract (you have to be currently under the : cap by whatever the average yearly figure of the deal is). The first two : years would be for the MLE and then the last two years would be backloaded so : that the entire deal would average out to $44 million (so the first two years : would be $5 million a year and the last two years would basically have to be : $16 million a year each). It is highly unlikely that a team would throw such : backloaded payments into a deal, as it is not good for anyone’s salary cap, : but I can imagine a team figuring that it would be especially bad for the : Knicks, what with the increases in Melo and STAT and Chandler’s salaries in : three years. Imagine the luxury tax that the Knicks would have to pay! So do : not be surprised if a team tries to give Lin a deal for more than $5 million : a year. Still, if Dolan is willing to pay the luxury tax, then the Knicks : cannot be outbid. 那麼有沒有可能有一些特殊情況發生呢? 有可能的，如果有一支球隊有11m的薪資空間，那麼他們將可以開給Lin一份，4年44m的合約，這份合約的前兩年是中產每年約500萬，而後兩年每年約1600萬，不太有可能有球隊這樣做，這樣對薪資結構的傷害太大了。 : So that’s pretty much it. The Knicks can keep both Fields and Lin, but if : they keep Lin, they are pretty much saying goodbye to any other notable free : agent. With the way Lin is playing, though, that is not such a bad thing. : Thanks to Larry Coon for his invaluable Salary Cap FAQ, which turned out to : be absolutely right on target (as it said “If a player is waived and is : claimed by another team before he clears waivers, then his Bird clock resets” : ). And thanks to the aforementioned Howard Beck! : =================================================== : 另一個觀點這篇作者認為尼克隊沒有早鳥權要請高手指點一下我們可以留下Fields和Lin，不過可能就沒什麼機會覬覦其他自由球員了。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 117.56.253.217

→

MOJS

02/15 23:05, , 1^F

02/15 23:05, 1^F

推

Joba07

02/15 23:07, , 2^F

02/15 23:07, 2^F

推

ying11027

02/15 23:10, , 3^F

02/15 23:10, 3^F