[外電] 第一輪後段該選誰 (上)

看板Kings作者RonArtest93 (新阿泰)時間15年前 (2009/05/13 00:16)推噓18(18推 0噓 30→)

留言48則, 11人參與討論串1/1

http://evilcowtowninc.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/lower-1st-round-ramblings/ Since the Kings have the 23rd and 31st overall pick, it stands to reason that they could get a rotation player, or two, out of this deal. I like that. The Kings need more talent, and if it’s through 3 cheap young talented players, so be it. I’ve heard of worse things. 國王這次有三個選秀如果都浪費掉那真的是最糟糕的事 I’m going to assume, partly because I’m a jerkoff know-it-all asshole who believes in the power of his own self importance, in that the Kings take Ricky Rubio, or another G like Tyreke Evans or Brandon Jennings. Because of this, the Kings will be looking at depth for their front line at their lower picks. They might even consider taking another PG or another SG or SF. It’s hard to say. 我想去猜測因為我自認是個無所不知且認為自己還蠻重要的混蛋 OK 所以國王前半有可能挑到RUBIO 建寧 EVANS 的後衛那後半就”比較可能” 去挑長人 Currently, DX has the Kings taking Daye at the 23rd slot. I think it’s a stretch to say that the Kings would take him, but hey, whatever. Fanhouse’s Tom Ziller (yes he blogs at StR AND Fanhouse–also BallHype–and guest blogs other places too) had an interesting mock draft that had the Kings taking Danny Green, a 2/3 swing type from Carolina. NBA Draft.net has the Kings taking Gani Lawal. (They also have the Kings taking Taj Gibson at the 31st overall pick.) 目前 DRAFT EXPRESS說國王會選Daye 的確他是個好選擇但是Fanhouse’s Tom Ziller卻說我們會選搖擺人Danny Green NBA DRAFT NET說我們該拿Gani Lawal跟Taj Gibson I like the idea of Lawal even though he’s very raw. He’s also athletic, and because the Kings have 2 talented young pivot’s in Spencer Hawes and Jason Thompson, they can afford to look at players who are smaller and are probably more simply prototpyical PF’s. It’s true that every team would love to have 4 guys who can play 2 positions at the PF/C position, but that’s simply not how the real world works. It’s a luxury for the Kings to have 2 talented young core pieces in Hawes and Thompson who can play the PF/C. While I’ve argued repeatedly that the Rubio/Griffin debate is just simply about upside and who has the greater chance of being a franchise player, or getting close to it at the very least, this debate is a bit easier. Needs comes into play here because it should. The Kings need to get deeper up front, and they need more athleticism, low post defense, shot blocking and rebounding. Players like Lawal and Gibson could help. So could Derrick Brown. 可以選Lawal雖然他還沒成熟但我們有兩隻老大哥JT跟HAWES頂著可以選些矮PF跟傳統打法的PF 每隊有四個可以打兩個位置(PF ,C)的長人是很好但這只是理想已經有JT跟HAWES 夠奢侈了不像選RUBIO OR BLAKE那樣困難國王需要有體能有低位防守會蓋鍋會抓版的PF Lawal Gibson Derrick Brown 三人都能幫忙到國王 My personal feeling is that rolling the dice at this lower point of the draft will help the Kings more than just taking the BPA. If the BPA is a role playing SF, than how does that really help the Kings? In 2005, the Kings left David Lee on the board because they wanted a multi-positional talent who could handle the ball in Garcia. They also believed that Kenny Thomas and Brian Skinner could capably man the position. I won’t second guess the decision, but now, the need to get a player who could develop at the power position is needed. So the point is, I guess, that there is precedent here. 我想這次後段的選秀可能放手一博比保守好譬如如果後段順位最好的球員是SF 那國王選來做什已經一堆SF了沒用嘛回想當年國王放掉DAVID LEE去選GARCIA因為我們需要會控球的SF 然後相信皮膚人跟KT能頂住禁區不是想是後諸葛只是有前例在前後段我們這次應該選PF Lawal, Gibson and Brown don’t need to head this debate. I wouldn’t mind if the Kings looked at BJ Mullens, but I would mind if they moved up to get him. Why waste a resource on a player like Mullens? If he drops to you that’s one thing. Petrie won’t necessarily leave Mullens on the board if that’s the case. But, again, this is BJ Mullens who is dropping like a stone. He’s a perfect project player for the Kings that they need to consider heavily if they want to develop a quality rotation of bigger players. 不像LAWAL GIBSON BRON的問題七呎長人BJ Mullens掉下來PETRIE要不要撿? 我不介意觀察一下BJ Mullens 但如果國王真的想追他我就很介意為何要浪費一個選秀順位選BJ Mullens? 沒有必要如果他被PETRIE撿起來那原因可能是國王打算加強長人的陣容深度 Beyond those 4, Tyler Hansborough might not be a bad idea at all if he drops to the 31st overall pick. Or, maybe you can trade down and get him with a lower 2nd round pick. Either way, Hansborough has had a successful NCAA career at UNC, and is not likely to be more than a hustling role player big. The Kings could use one of those too. Hell, Hansborough and Mullens might be the best mix of hustle role player and upside that they might get the best out of both. The Kings aren’t good enough to throw any possiiblities away. That’s why I won’t discount Hansborough even though his physical abilities are not considered high end talent. There is absolutely no shame in that. (Of course, some team in the later 1st round might take Hansborough for the same reason.) 上述四位外如果31順位能選到苦工之王漢堡也是不賴漢堡跟Mullens 一個代表苦工界的霸主一個代表潛力長人的希望各擅所長國王不該放棄任何機會即使漢堡沒有很好的體能苦工界的霸主還是霸主! 沒什好丟臉的! Milan Macvan is a guy who might be best served taking in the 2nd round (especially if Petrie is able to get multiple picks in the 2nd round somehow someway). Milan Macvan也許是第二輪的大黑馬喔如果PETRIE第二輪想多抓幾隻黑馬的話要注意他 Victor Claver is a player who might not last past the 2nd round because some team in the late 1st round could easily take a flier on him (OKC, Chicago, San Antonio, LA or Cleveland could all work here). Victor Claver不太可能掉到二輪因為其他球隊會想要他 Omri Casspi is not a player I’m greatly interested in because he seems to be a total SF/PF tweener (similar to several other players I won’t mention here). I think the Kings have enough of those already in Donte Greene and Andres Nocioni, and as such, there’s no real great need in this area. Still, if you think one of them can make a real impact that trading either guy is worth doing so, then I suppose this should be up for consideration. OMRI我不是很有興趣他有點像SF PF雙挑的球員國王類似的已經有NOCI跟GREENE了除非他們兩其中之一被交易我才想選 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 61.224.36.165

→

RonArtest93

05/13 00:17, , 1^F

05/13 00:17, 1^F

※ 編輯: RonArtest93 來自: 61.224.36.165 (05/13 00:18)

推

pennykidd

05/13 00:49, , 2^F

05/13 00:49, 2^F

推

hihi29

05/13 01:07, , 3^F