[新聞] 高雄面試開28K主管問你怎麼會要這種薪水?
她高雄面試會計開28K 主管:你怎麼會要求這種薪水?.
http://www.ettoday.net/news/20160618/719005.htm#ixzz4Bv6THx1a
媒體來源:東森新聞
畢業季節來臨,許多年輕人紛紛投入職場,一名網友也在「批踢踢薪水版」發文說,在她
看來,高雄的薪資實在有點慘,昨天去面試了一間傳產公司,一去就苦等主管半小時,好
不容易和對方面談,最後結果卻讓她驚呆了。
網友在文中寫道,自己請了假要去面試會計,結果主管竟讓她等了半小時,面談過程中,
對方更直接表明薪資不到28K,並反問原po是否有其他面試經驗。主管表示,「大家薪資
都差不多吧,就是所謂的22K試用期,3個月後24K,你怎麼會要求這樣的薪水?」
聽到主管這樣回答,原po的心立刻涼了一半,「我為什麼會要求這樣的薪水?我才想要反
問你們,為什麼給薪給那麼低?說了我朋友在某醫院當會計,也是28K。 那個主管說因為
他們是醫院,我又說了我另外一個朋友,在某間公司 (好像是大型機具公司) 也是28K半
年後升30K。那個主管就問說:『她們會計幾個?他們會計有我們那麼多嗎?』但很好玩
耶,這樣的論點是,你們會計那麼多 (分了很多會計部門),薪水是這樣剝削來的嗎?」
原po最後透露,高雄的工作環境很差,能去的幾乎都血汗工作,比如她之前去面試,對方
要求考英翻中+會計+面試+中英打,結果只有24K,即使上市上櫃也是如此;再來,她目前
待的公司也是很剝削員工,「加班沒加班費,薪資也慘兮兮。待了3年,年假只有5天,喔
對!是不管你待幾年,年假都5天喔!」因為實在太慘,讓她忍不住想問,請問高雄的傳
產都是這樣嗎?
這篇文章一出,立刻引發熱烈討論。有人說「高雄有 22k 就要謝謝主隆恩」、「對不起
,勞基法高雄不適用」、「一堆高雄中小企業早該淘汰」、「陳菊執政的城市你期待什麼
」;還有網友殘酷地說:「顏色對了,一切問題就不是問題」、「22k就要偷笑了,無情
低薪城市...」
有點想哭~~~唉........
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.70.94.100
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Kaohsiung/M.1466240938.A.CFD.html
推
06/18 17:12, , 1F
06/18 17:12, 1F
推
06/18 17:21, , 2F
06/18 17:21, 2F
→
06/18 17:21, , 3F
06/18 17:21, 3F
推
06/18 17:24, , 4F
06/18 17:24, 4F
→
06/18 17:26, , 5F
06/18 17:26, 5F
→
06/18 17:26, , 6F
06/18 17:26, 6F
→
06/18 17:27, , 7F
06/18 17:27, 7F
→
06/18 17:27, , 8F
06/18 17:27, 8F
→
06/18 17:27, , 9F
06/18 17:27, 9F
推
06/18 17:31, , 10F
06/18 17:31, 10F
推
06/18 17:32, , 11F
06/18 17:32, 11F
推
06/18 17:33, , 12F
06/18 17:33, 12F
推
06/18 17:34, , 13F
06/18 17:34, 13F
推
06/18 17:37, , 14F
06/18 17:37, 14F
→
06/18 17:37, , 15F
06/18 17:37, 15F
推
06/18 17:38, , 16F
06/18 17:38, 16F
推
06/18 17:40, , 17F
06/18 17:40, 17F
推
06/18 17:40, , 18F
06/18 17:40, 18F
→
06/18 17:41, , 19F
06/18 17:41, 19F
推
06/18 17:42, , 20F
06/18 17:42, 20F
噓
06/18 17:42, , 21F
06/18 17:42, 21F
推
06/18 17:43, , 22F
06/18 17:43, 22F
→
06/18 17:44, , 23F
06/18 17:44, 23F
→
06/18 17:45, , 24F
06/18 17:45, 24F
→
06/18 17:45, , 25F
06/18 17:45, 25F
→
06/18 17:45, , 26F
06/18 17:45, 26F
→
06/18 17:46, , 27F
06/18 17:46, 27F
→
06/18 17:47, , 28F
06/18 17:47, 28F
推
06/18 17:48, , 29F
06/18 17:48, 29F
推
06/18 17:49, , 30F
06/18 17:49, 30F
推
06/18 17:54, , 31F
06/18 17:54, 31F
推
06/18 17:54, , 32F
06/18 17:54, 32F
推
06/18 17:55, , 33F
06/18 17:55, 33F
推
06/18 17:56, , 34F
06/18 17:56, 34F
→
06/18 17:57, , 35F
06/18 17:57, 35F
→
06/18 17:58, , 36F
06/18 17:58, 36F
→
06/18 17:58, , 37F
06/18 17:58, 37F
→
06/18 17:59, , 38F
06/18 17:59, 38F
→
06/18 17:59, , 39F
06/18 17:59, 39F
還有 73 則推文
推
06/19 01:36, , 113F
06/19 01:36, 113F
推
06/19 01:41, , 114F
06/19 01:41, 114F
推
06/19 01:48, , 115F
06/19 01:48, 115F
→
06/19 01:49, , 116F
06/19 01:49, 116F
→
06/19 01:54, , 117F
06/19 01:54, 117F
→
06/19 01:58, , 118F
06/19 01:58, 118F
推
06/19 01:58, , 119F
06/19 01:58, 119F
推
06/19 02:08, , 120F
06/19 02:08, 120F
推
06/19 02:12, , 121F
06/19 02:12, 121F
推
06/19 02:27, , 122F
06/19 02:27, 122F
推
06/19 02:32, , 123F
06/19 02:32, 123F
推
06/19 02:35, , 124F
06/19 02:35, 124F
→
06/19 02:48, , 125F
06/19 02:48, 125F
推
06/19 03:02, , 126F
06/19 03:02, 126F
推
06/19 03:31, , 127F
06/19 03:31, 127F
→
06/19 03:32, , 128F
06/19 03:32, 128F
推
06/19 04:47, , 129F
06/19 04:47, 129F
推
06/19 07:01, , 130F
06/19 07:01, 130F
→
06/19 07:01, , 131F
06/19 07:01, 131F
推
06/19 09:37, , 132F
06/19 09:37, 132F
推
06/19 09:38, , 133F
06/19 09:38, 133F
→
06/19 09:50, , 134F
06/19 09:50, 134F
→
06/19 09:51, , 135F
06/19 09:51, 135F
推
06/19 11:19, , 136F
06/19 11:19, 136F
推
06/19 11:21, , 137F
06/19 11:21, 137F
→
06/19 11:21, , 138F
06/19 11:21, 138F
推
06/19 12:37, , 139F
06/19 12:37, 139F
→
06/19 12:37, , 140F
06/19 12:37, 140F
→
06/19 12:38, , 141F
06/19 12:38, 141F
推
06/19 13:14, , 142F
06/19 13:14, 142F
推
06/19 14:55, , 143F
06/19 14:55, 143F
推
06/19 18:48, , 144F
06/19 18:48, 144F
推
06/20 05:06, , 145F
06/20 05:06, 145F
→
06/20 05:06, , 146F
06/20 05:06, 146F
→
06/20 05:07, , 147F
06/20 05:07, 147F
推
06/20 06:44, , 148F
06/20 06:44, 148F
推
06/20 13:06, , 149F
06/20 13:06, 149F
推
06/22 10:02, , 150F
06/22 10:02, 150F
→
06/22 10:04, , 151F
06/22 10:04, 151F
→
06/22 10:06, , 152F
06/22 10:06, 152F