[建議] 請理性討論
各位板友好
看到板上這幾天高漲的人氣
有種不知道該開心還是難過的感覺...
這幾天出現了很多爭議性的推文
但其實文章本身是沒有問題的
希望大家在熱烈討論的同時
可以思考到底這篇文章的主題是什麼?
政見的文章底下出現板友名單的討論
板友名單的文章底下出現政見的討論
我只能用眼花撩亂四個字來形容
希望大家可以再更理性的討論
對不同的意見有不同的看法是好事
但請秉持著"對事不對人"的原則
不管是板主或是板友
都是KAT-TUN板的一份子
希望KAT-TUN板是由大家來共同維護的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.70.113.131
推
09/10 01:21, , 1F
09/10 01:21, 1F
推
09/10 01:24, , 2F
09/10 01:24, 2F
推
09/10 01:25, , 3F
09/10 01:25, 3F
推
09/10 02:00, , 4F
09/10 02:00, 4F
推
09/10 02:04, , 5F
09/10 02:04, 5F
推
09/10 02:06, , 6F
09/10 02:06, 6F
推
09/10 02:28, , 7F
09/10 02:28, 7F
推
09/10 03:36, , 8F
09/10 03:36, 8F
→
09/10 03:37, , 9F
09/10 03:37, 9F
推
09/10 03:45, , 10F
09/10 03:45, 10F
→
09/10 03:45, , 11F
09/10 03:45, 11F
推
09/10 04:44, , 12F
09/10 04:44, 12F
推
09/10 05:20, , 13F
09/10 05:20, 13F
→
09/10 05:22, , 14F
09/10 05:22, 14F
推
09/10 08:04, , 15F
09/10 08:04, 15F
→
09/10 08:05, , 16F
09/10 08:05, 16F
→
09/10 08:06, , 17F
09/10 08:06, 17F
→
09/10 09:43, , 18F
09/10 09:43, 18F
→
09/10 09:48, , 19F
09/10 09:48, 19F
推
09/10 11:04, , 20F
09/10 11:04, 20F
推
09/10 11:15, , 21F
09/10 11:15, 21F
推
09/10 11:25, , 22F
09/10 11:25, 22F
→
09/10 11:53, , 23F
09/10 11:53, 23F
推
09/10 13:57, , 24F
09/10 13:57, 24F
→
09/10 13:58, , 25F
09/10 13:58, 25F
推
09/10 14:29, , 26F
09/10 14:29, 26F
→
09/10 14:30, , 27F
09/10 14:30, 27F
→
09/10 14:30, , 28F
09/10 14:30, 28F
推
09/10 19:02, , 29F
09/10 19:02, 29F
推
09/10 19:16, , 30F
09/10 19:16, 30F
推
09/10 19:22, , 31F
09/10 19:22, 31F
→
09/10 19:30, , 32F
09/10 19:30, 32F
推
09/10 19:40, , 33F
09/10 19:40, 33F
→
09/10 19:41, , 34F
09/10 19:41, 34F
→
09/10 20:20, , 35F
09/10 20:20, 35F
→
09/10 20:20, , 36F
09/10 20:20, 36F
→
09/10 20:29, , 37F
09/10 20:29, 37F
→
09/10 20:30, , 38F
09/10 20:30, 38F
→
09/10 20:47, , 39F
09/10 20:47, 39F
→
09/10 21:38, , 40F
09/10 21:38, 40F
→
09/10 21:53, , 41F
09/10 21:53, 41F
→
09/10 21:54, , 42F
09/10 21:54, 42F
我昨天晚上PO這篇文的用意是想要讓大家停止討論
並認真的想想自己到底推了些什麼文
但遺憾的是
前面兩篇的推文還是依然的文不對題
而且這篇的推文也逐漸的偏離主題
對於引起板上那麼多的糾紛我深感抱歉
推文中有人提到什麼死忠支持者或是噗浪好友
的確有很多人是我在批踢踢的KAT-TUN板所結交的朋友
但我必須說
我並沒有要求任何人來進行所謂的護航
(相信miroku板主也沒有)
至於分身ID
我個人是非常討厭分身ID這種行為
但板規並沒有提及這部份
我也無法去干涉板友是否使用分身ID
只能請各位板友自重
最後我想說
不管各位板友支持哪位板主的政見
都請尊重另一位板主以及其他的板友
板友們可以針對"政見"方面來討論
請不要進行人身攻擊或是過多的揣測
請不要忘記這裡是公開板,並非個人的心情抒發天地
謝謝
※ 編輯: fmegumih 來自: 219.70.113.131 (09/10 21:59)
→
09/10 21:59, , 43F
09/10 21:59, 43F
→
09/10 21:59, , 44F
09/10 21:59, 44F
→
09/10 22:10, , 45F
09/10 22:10, 45F
→
09/10 22:11, , 46F
09/10 22:11, 46F
→
09/10 22:11, , 47F
09/10 22:11, 47F
→
09/10 22:12, , 48F
09/10 22:12, 48F
→
09/10 22:13, , 49F
09/10 22:13, 49F
→
09/10 22:13, , 50F
09/10 22:13, 50F
→
09/10 22:14, , 51F
09/10 22:14, 51F
推
09/10 22:20, , 52F
09/10 22:20, 52F
→
09/10 22:20, , 53F
09/10 22:20, 53F
→
09/10 22:20, , 54F
09/10 22:20, 54F
→
09/10 22:20, , 55F
09/10 22:20, 55F
→
09/10 22:21, , 56F
09/10 22:21, 56F
→
09/10 22:21, , 57F
09/10 22:21, 57F
→
09/10 22:21, , 58F
09/10 22:21, 58F
→
09/10 22:21, , 59F
09/10 22:21, 59F
→
09/10 22:22, , 60F
09/10 22:22, 60F
→
09/10 22:22, , 61F
09/10 22:22, 61F
→
09/10 22:22, , 62F
09/10 22:22, 62F
→
09/10 22:23, , 63F
09/10 22:23, 63F
→
09/10 22:23, , 64F
09/10 22:23, 64F
→
09/10 22:25, , 65F
09/10 22:25, 65F
推
09/10 22:28, , 66F
09/10 22:28, 66F
→
09/10 22:28, , 67F
09/10 22:28, 67F
推
09/10 22:28, , 68F
09/10 22:28, 68F
→
09/10 22:31, , 69F
09/10 22:31, 69F
推
09/10 22:33, , 70F
09/10 22:33, 70F
→
09/10 22:34, , 71F
09/10 22:34, 71F
→
09/10 22:35, , 72F
09/10 22:35, 72F
→
09/10 22:35, , 73F
09/10 22:35, 73F
→
09/10 22:36, , 74F
09/10 22:36, 74F
推
09/10 22:37, , 75F
09/10 22:37, 75F
→
09/10 22:37, , 76F
09/10 22:37, 76F
→
09/10 22:37, , 77F
09/10 22:37, 77F
→
09/10 22:38, , 78F
09/10 22:38, 78F
→
09/10 22:39, , 79F
09/10 22:39, 79F
→
09/10 22:40, , 80F
09/10 22:40, 80F
→
09/10 22:43, , 81F
09/10 22:43, 81F
→
09/10 22:53, , 82F
09/10 22:53, 82F
→
09/10 22:54, , 83F
09/10 22:54, 83F
→
09/10 22:54, , 84F
09/10 22:54, 84F
推
09/10 23:12, , 85F
09/10 23:12, 85F
→
09/10 23:12, , 86F
09/10 23:12, 86F
推
09/10 23:22, , 87F
09/10 23:22, 87F