[外絮] 兩則林書豪在上一場的表現
官網at the hive: http://tinyurl.com/j9plu6n (僅節錄跟林書豪有關的)
Jeremy Lin had a nice performance despite missing a couple open shots,
helping to move the ball, especially late in the first quarter when the
Hornets faced their biggest deficit of the game. He'll need to start shooting
more efficiently for him to warrant extra playing time (without an injury to
a backcourt player), but the second unit has been ganging up on opposing
teams all year, and Lin's a big reason why.
縱然林書豪沒能投進幾顆open shots, 他今天還是有好表現, 他幫忙讓球流轉的順暢, 特
別是上半場後段當黃蜂遇上該場比賽最大的落後時. 但該說的還是得說, 林書豪將會需要
更有效率的出手, 好讓他能獲得更多的上場時間; 黃蜂的第二陣容已經成為讓對手不容小
覷的隊伍, 而林書豪就是第二陣容如此好的最大原因
Jeremy Lin the Difference Between Winning & Losing
輸贏之間, 不同的林書豪 http://tinyurl.com/ovfv8vp
The Charlotte Hornets beating the Milwaukee Bucks 87-82 was achieved in part
due to Jeremy Lin having a fantastic first half to carry the team to a lead
they wouldn’t let go of, although his fourth quarter will be another one
that won’t show his contribution on the box score, getting taken off just
before the finish.
上一場黃蜂能以87-82擊敗公鹿, 有部分得歸功於林書豪上半場推動球隊攻勢的努力, 他
打得相當出色讓黃蜂得以保有領先的優勢, 雖然他第四節做的貢獻不是那種能在box上看
出來的, 但還是重要到讓教練一直將他擺在場上直到最後兩分多鐘才讓他下場
Lin finished with 7 points in 22 minutes, shooting just 1-of-4 from the field
and adding 3 rebounds and 4 assists. He once again played excellent defense
and his ability to get the team running to cancel out the Bucks’ very good
defense in the first half was the reason the Hornets could control the game
in the second half with the lead on their side. Lin missed shots in the
second half and didn’t get to the line; his shooting is certainly an issue
to be worried about right now. But he does so much more for this team during
his minutes.
該場林書豪上場22分鐘4投1中拿下7分3籃板4助攻, 再一次的林書豪打出相當出色的防守
, 並幫助球隊在上半場衝破公鹿當時極好的防守, 他的努力就是黃蜂得以在下半場掌握
球賽主導權的原因; 下半場林錯失了幾次出手, 也沒能站上罰球線, 現在他的跳投成了
一項隱憂, 但在有上場的時間裡他還是替球隊獲勝做出了許多正面的貢獻
Lin was taken off the floor for good with 2:08 left in the game, with the
Hornets leading by four points. Guess what happened? They lost the lead, with
Kemba Walker and Nicolas Batum missing three times in one possession. When
the game was tied, the Hornets finally managed to pull away on a Batum
3-pointer and Walker finishing the job as the Bucks defense looked confused
about who to defend. Walker led the Hornets with 22 points, Batum scored 15
on another bad shooting night (4-of-13 from the field).
終場前2:08黃蜂領先4分, 林書豪被換下場, 馬上領先的分數就如夢幻泡影般沒了, 直到
Batum命中三分球後才再度有了勝利希望
Compared to the previous games, Lin staying on the floor for most of the
fourth quarter is an improvement, and he finished the game with a +10, behind
only Frank Kaminsky and Jeremy Lamb, who Lin helped get going in the second
quarter, doing the same for other players. Lamb works at his best with Lin
finding him on open slots around the perimeter or behind defenses, finishing
with 14 points. He looks a lot less effective with Batum and Walker playing
with him on the perimeter, both of them slightly eating into his territory
and not being the passers Lin is.
跟前幾場相比, 這場球林書豪也幾乎打滿了第四節, 真是令人欣慰的進步啊~ 最終他有著
+10的正負值只比Kaminsky跟Lamb少, Lamb的許多出手機會是林創造出來的, 他也在跟林
書豪搭配時表現得最好, 跟Batum以及Walker同在場上時打的就沒那樣有效率
But again, why did Clifford take off Lin? He missed three shots, something
that happens. He didn’t take poor shots and maybe more importantly,
considering how Clifford seems to work, he didn’t turn the ball over. The
Hornets almost immediately become a worse team once Lin leaves the game, even
if he isn’t having a good shooting day. Lin isn’t the kind of player to try
and shoot himself out of a slump. For better and worse (sometimes you need to
be selfish), Lin usually gets himself going by creating opportunities for
others, and in the last season or two, through defense as well.
那為什麼Clifford最後關頭把林書豪換下場呢? 因為林miss了三次跳投; 但林並沒有出現
糟糕的出手選擇啊, 更重要的是他沒有任何失誤. 縱使林書豪該場比賽手感不佳, 黃蜂還
是在林書豪下場後馬上level down了一級. 林書豪不是那種手感差時會一直出手讓自己
手感投到熱的球員, 不管怎樣, (有時候你需要自私些)他通常都是那種替隊友創造機會為
優先的人, 前一兩季他也會透過用防守來幫助球隊跟隊友
Lin hitting a three is encouraging considering his shooting numbers lately
(only 37.5% from the field in the last nine games) and he should be trying a
little bit more to get to the basket, which usually helps him get hotter for
the longer shots, but once again, in the short time he was on the floor
compared to others, he showed what an invaluable piece of the puzzle he is,
even when he’s not scoring. Unlike Walker and Batum, he’s not hurting the
team when he’s having a bad shooting day.
林書豪這場終於命中三分了, 可喜可賀啊~ 因為他進來的出手命中率很慘, 近九場37.5%
, 他應該試著更加去挑戰籃框, 這通常也能讓他在外圍投射的手感更好些. 但在此我要
再次強調一下, 林書豪在場上時他的確展現出他不可或缺的價值, 即使不透過出手攻擊也
是, 他跟Batum或Walker不同, 林書豪即使當天手感不佳也不會因此對球隊造成傷害
-----------------------------------------
簡單翻譯, peggie就振作起來吧別哭了喔~~
下一場猜中林書豪得分 & S.Curry三分球命中數的林迷版友, 每位1萬P, 最多發3位
條件: 非林酸 & 書豪得分>12.5 & Curry有命中三分球
ex: Let's rain heavily! 書豪20分, Curry五顆三分~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.250.135.23
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Jeremy_Lin/M.1448959606.A.AE9.html
→
12/01 16:46, , 1F
12/01 16:46, 1F
推
12/01 16:50, , 2F
12/01 16:50, 2F
推
12/01 16:51, , 3F
12/01 16:51, 3F
推
12/01 16:52, , 4F
12/01 16:52, 4F
→
12/01 16:53, , 5F
12/01 16:53, 5F
→
12/01 16:54, , 6F
12/01 16:54, 6F
推
12/01 16:55, , 7F
12/01 16:55, 7F
推
12/01 16:56, , 8F
12/01 16:56, 8F
推
12/01 16:58, , 9F
12/01 16:58, 9F
推
12/01 17:03, , 10F
12/01 17:03, 10F
推
12/01 17:06, , 11F
12/01 17:06, 11F
→
12/01 17:09, , 12F
12/01 17:09, 12F
推
12/01 17:14, , 13F
12/01 17:14, 13F
推
12/01 17:15, , 14F
12/01 17:15, 14F
→
12/01 17:15, , 15F
12/01 17:15, 15F
你沒說我還不知道自己漏翻了, 感謝啊~~
推
12/01 17:19, , 16F
12/01 17:19, 16F
推
12/01 17:21, , 17F
12/01 17:21, 17F
推
12/01 17:22, , 18F
12/01 17:22, 18F
推
12/01 17:23, , 19F
12/01 17:23, 19F
推
12/01 17:24, , 20F
12/01 17:24, 20F
推
12/01 17:24, , 21F
12/01 17:24, 21F
推
12/01 17:25, , 22F
12/01 17:25, 22F
※ 編輯: djviva (60.250.135.23), 12/01/2015 17:27:03
推
12/01 17:32, , 23F
12/01 17:32, 23F
推
12/01 17:32, , 24F
12/01 17:32, 24F
推
12/01 17:35, , 25F
12/01 17:35, 25F
推
12/01 17:35, , 26F
12/01 17:35, 26F
推
12/01 17:36, , 27F
12/01 17:36, 27F
推
12/01 17:45, , 28F
12/01 17:45, 28F
推
12/01 17:46, , 29F
12/01 17:46, 29F
推
12/01 17:49, , 30F
12/01 17:49, 30F
推
12/01 17:52, , 31F
12/01 17:52, 31F
推
12/01 17:57, , 32F
12/01 17:57, 32F
推
12/01 18:03, , 33F
12/01 18:03, 33F
推
12/01 18:03, , 34F
12/01 18:03, 34F
推
12/01 18:09, , 35F
12/01 18:09, 35F
推
12/01 18:22, , 36F
12/01 18:22, 36F
推
12/01 18:33, , 37F
12/01 18:33, 37F
推
12/01 18:36, , 38F
12/01 18:36, 38F
推
12/01 18:42, , 39F
12/01 18:42, 39F
推
12/01 18:49, , 40F
12/01 18:49, 40F
推
12/01 18:55, , 41F
12/01 18:55, 41F
推
12/01 18:59, , 42F
12/01 18:59, 42F
推
12/01 19:00, , 43F
12/01 19:00, 43F
→
12/01 19:01, , 44F
12/01 19:01, 44F
→
12/01 19:01, , 45F
12/01 19:01, 45F
推
12/01 19:06, , 46F
12/01 19:06, 46F
推
12/01 19:19, , 47F
12/01 19:19, 47F
推
12/01 19:43, , 48F
12/01 19:43, 48F
推
12/01 19:45, , 49F
12/01 19:45, 49F
推
12/01 19:45, , 50F
12/01 19:45, 50F
推
12/01 19:51, , 51F
12/01 19:51, 51F
推
12/01 20:26, , 52F
12/01 20:26, 52F
推
12/01 20:29, , 53F
12/01 20:29, 53F
→
12/01 20:29, , 54F
12/01 20:29, 54F
推
12/01 20:29, , 55F
12/01 20:29, 55F
推
12/01 20:34, , 56F
12/01 20:34, 56F
推
12/01 20:56, , 57F
12/01 20:56, 57F
推
12/01 21:14, , 58F
12/01 21:14, 58F
推
12/01 21:32, , 59F
12/01 21:32, 59F
推
12/01 21:33, , 60F
12/01 21:33, 60F
推
12/01 21:39, , 61F
12/01 21:39, 61F
推
12/01 21:49, , 62F
12/01 21:49, 62F
推
12/01 22:02, , 63F
12/01 22:02, 63F
推
12/01 22:18, , 64F
12/01 22:18, 64F
→
12/01 22:18, , 65F
12/01 22:18, 65F
推
12/01 22:19, , 66F
12/01 22:19, 66F
推
12/01 22:34, , 67F
12/01 22:34, 67F
→
12/01 22:36, , 68F
12/01 22:36, 68F
推
12/01 22:39, , 69F
12/01 22:39, 69F
推
12/01 22:41, , 70F
12/01 22:41, 70F
推
12/01 22:44, , 71F
12/01 22:44, 71F
推
12/01 22:44, , 72F
12/01 22:44, 72F
推
12/01 22:46, , 73F
12/01 22:46, 73F
→
12/01 22:47, , 74F
12/01 22:47, 74F
推
12/01 22:53, , 75F
12/01 22:53, 75F
推
12/01 23:08, , 76F
12/01 23:08, 76F
→
12/01 23:08, , 77F
12/01 23:08, 77F
推
12/01 23:10, , 78F
12/01 23:10, 78F
→
12/01 23:11, , 79F
12/01 23:11, 79F
推
12/01 23:20, , 80F
12/01 23:20, 80F
推
12/01 23:28, , 81F
12/01 23:28, 81F
推
12/01 23:38, , 82F
12/01 23:38, 82F
推
12/01 23:43, , 83F
12/01 23:43, 83F
推
12/01 23:49, , 84F
12/01 23:49, 84F
→
12/01 23:50, , 85F
12/01 23:50, 85F
推
12/02 00:52, , 86F
12/02 00:52, 86F
→
12/02 00:52, , 87F
12/02 00:52, 87F
推
12/02 00:59, , 88F
12/02 00:59, 88F
推
12/02 01:29, , 89F
12/02 01:29, 89F
推
12/02 07:45, , 90F
12/02 07:45, 90F
推
12/02 09:15, , 91F
12/02 09:15, 91F
推
12/02 12:29, , 92F
12/02 12:29, 92F
推
12/02 12:46, , 93F
12/02 12:46, 93F
推
12/02 16:58, , 94F
12/02 16:58, 94F
推
12/02 19:33, , 95F
12/02 19:33, 95F
推
12/03 00:09, , 96F
12/03 00:09, 96F