[外絮] 林書豪 & Ed Davis, the P&R Connection
Jeremy Lin and Ed Davis, the Pick and Roll Connection
林書豪與Ed Davis, 擋拆好組合! http://tinyurl.com/owxfrk4
When people think Jeremy Lin, the word “Linsanity” comes to mind. One key
to his success was his chemistry on the floor with Tyson Chandler. Chandler
gave Lin solid screens, rolled well to the empty spots, and finished with
authority.
當人們提到林書豪, 腦中就會浮現"Linsanity", 林來瘋的成功, 其中一個重要因子就是
林書豪與Tyson Chandler在場上的化學效應, Tyson扎實的替林書豪擋出空間並滑順的移
動到空檔, 然後接獲林書豪的妙傳助攻上籃得分~
It looks like Jeremy Lin found his Tyson Chandler again, this time in Ed
Davis.
今天看來, 林書豪已經找到了在湖人的Tyson, 那人就是Ed Davis!!
Jeremy Lin – Ed Davis combo has been terrific off screen/roll. Twice, Lin
fed Davis for layups, Davis using his length to get to the rim.
— Mike Trudell (@LakersReporter) October 7, 2014
湖人轉播員Mike在今天賽中說到: 林書豪和Ed搭檔出極讚的screen/roll組合, 大家看!
林書豪再一次的把球餵給了Ed上籃, Ed也善用他的身高將球放進籃框了!
Tonight, Jeremy Lin struggled with his shooting from the field. He attacked
the basket repeatedly, only to be met with bigmen in the paint waiting to
swat the ball. When Ed Davis joined the lineup alongside Jeremy Lin, things
changed. Although Jeremy Lin finished with an 0-6 shooting night, he also
lead the Lakers in assists with 10, on just 1 turnover. There seemed to be a
Steve Nash flashback of last season, where Nash struggled from the field, but
was able to rack up his assists.
今晚林書豪跳投手感不好, 屢次挑戰籃框在對方的高個子防守下都無攻而返, 但當Ed上
場跟林並肩作戰後, 狀況就變了. 儘管林書豪今晚6投0中, 他還是傳出全隊最高的10
次助攻並且只有1次失誤, 有點像是上季的Nash, 自己出手手感差卻還是能傳助攻
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V452PXvl8Hs
今晚林-Ed連線最嗨的一次空中接力灌籃!!
Ed Davis was the primary target of those assists. He finished with 6 of 7
shooting from the field; 12 points and 4 blocks. While he grabbed just one
rebound for the game, the Lakers did manage to outrebound the Denver Nuggets
45-43. Davis may not be the explosive finisher that Tyson Chandler is, but he
is the more creative one. Not only did he get points from point-blank range,
he showed dexterity on the floor as well. On one particular pick-and-roll
sequence, Davis received the basketball from the high-post, took one-dribble,
and was able to finish with a soft shot with his off-hand.
Ed無疑是林書豪那些助攻最吸睛的焦點, 他今晚繳出7投6中12分4火鍋的表現, 雖然在籃
板方面只抓下一顆, 但湖人籃板數還是以45-43壓過金塊. Ed或許不是Tyson那樣具有爆
發力的得分手, 但他卻比Tyson來的更靈活更讓人充滿想像力. 這樣說不僅僅是因為他那
些灌籃, 還因為他在場上展現出的靈活度. 像是在一次P&R中, 他在高位接到球後運了一
下, 然後輕巧的投籃出手命中.
Jeremy Lin and Ed Davis have a certain chemistry on the floor. Both players
excel with pick-and-roll play. It is surprising to see how well-developed
that chemistry is, considering both players are recent acquisitions for the
Lakers. Really, 10 assists for Jeremy Lin? Ed Davis shooting 6 of 7 from
the field? I don’t think anyone saw that coming.
今晚的比賽看的出林書豪和Ed之間已經有了良好的化學效應, 他們倆P&R都打得很好,
一想到他們倆是第一次同隊打球就不禁為今晚看到的那麼純熟的化學效應感到驚訝.
林書豪傳出10次助攻, 真的嗎??? Ed今晚7投6中, 是真的嗎????
我不認為賽前有誰能夠料到會有這樣棒的事情發生~
Not bad for their debut as teammates. Hopefully they get more time together
on the floor for the regular season.
他們倆同隊第一次配合的結果挺不賴的, 衷心期盼他們倆能有更多的時間在場上配合
What do you guys think? Should Jeremy Lin and Ed Davis get more time on the
floor at the expense of Steve Nash and Jordan Hill?
那你們這些鄉民覺得咧? 比起Nash跟J.Hill搭配上場, 林書豪跟Ed這組合是不是應該獲
得更多時間咧??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.250.135.187
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Jeremy_Lin/M.1412666315.A.049.html
推
10/07 15:21, , 1F
10/07 15:21, 1F
推
10/07 15:22, , 2F
10/07 15:22, 2F
→
10/07 15:23, , 3F
10/07 15:23, 3F
推
10/07 15:23, , 4F
10/07 15:23, 4F
同場加映Ed Davis簡歷
1. 2010年的NBA選秀中第1輪第13順位被多倫多暴龍選中
2. 25歲, 6呎10吋, 225磅
3. 以往在暴龍場均打15~24分鐘, 得5~9分, 抄截0.5, 火鍋1
今天在湖人打12分鐘, 得12分, 搧出4火鍋....他應該今起就愛上林書豪了吧~~
※ 編輯: djviva (60.250.135.187), 10/07/2014 15:31:28
推
10/07 15:27, , 5F
10/07 15:27, 5F
推
10/07 15:30, , 6F
10/07 15:30, 6F
推
10/07 15:31, , 7F
10/07 15:31, 7F
→
10/07 15:35, , 8F
10/07 15:35, 8F
推
10/07 15:38, , 9F
10/07 15:38, 9F
推
10/07 15:39, , 10F
10/07 15:39, 10F
真的耶, 感謝指正, 我一定是鬼遮眼了哈哈
推
10/07 15:39, , 11F
10/07 15:39, 11F
※ 編輯: djviva (60.250.135.187), 10/07/2014 15:41:45
推
10/07 15:45, , 12F
10/07 15:45, 12F
推
10/07 15:46, , 13F
10/07 15:46, 13F
→
10/07 15:46, , 14F
10/07 15:46, 14F
推
10/07 15:47, , 15F
10/07 15:47, 15F
推
10/07 15:47, , 16F
10/07 15:47, 16F
推
10/07 15:49, , 17F
10/07 15:49, 17F
→
10/07 15:50, , 18F
10/07 15:50, 18F
推
10/07 15:53, , 19F
10/07 15:53, 19F
推
10/07 15:54, , 20F
10/07 15:54, 20F
推
10/07 15:56, , 21F
10/07 15:56, 21F
→
10/07 15:56, , 22F
10/07 15:56, 22F
→
10/07 15:57, , 23F
10/07 15:57, 23F
→
10/07 15:57, , 24F
10/07 15:57, 24F
推
10/07 15:59, , 25F
10/07 15:59, 25F
→
10/07 16:28, , 26F
10/07 16:28, 26F
→
10/07 16:32, , 27F
10/07 16:32, 27F
推
10/07 16:36, , 28F
10/07 16:36, 28F
推
10/07 16:37, , 29F
10/07 16:37, 29F
推
10/07 16:52, , 30F
10/07 16:52, 30F
推
10/07 16:58, , 31F
10/07 16:58, 31F
推
10/07 17:00, , 32F
10/07 17:00, 32F
→
10/07 17:05, , 33F
10/07 17:05, 33F
推
10/07 17:15, , 34F
10/07 17:15, 34F
推
10/07 17:20, , 35F
10/07 17:20, 35F
→
10/07 17:26, , 36F
10/07 17:26, 36F
→
10/07 17:26, , 37F
10/07 17:26, 37F
→
10/07 17:27, , 38F
10/07 17:27, 38F
→
10/07 17:27, , 39F
10/07 17:27, 39F
→
10/07 17:44, , 40F
10/07 17:44, 40F
→
10/07 17:44, , 41F
10/07 17:44, 41F
推
10/07 18:10, , 42F
10/07 18:10, 42F
推
10/07 18:37, , 43F
10/07 18:37, 43F
推
10/07 18:48, , 44F
10/07 18:48, 44F
→
10/07 18:49, , 45F
10/07 18:49, 45F
推
10/07 19:04, , 46F
10/07 19:04, 46F
推
10/07 19:21, , 47F
10/07 19:21, 47F
→
10/07 19:22, , 48F
10/07 19:22, 48F
推
10/07 20:04, , 49F
10/07 20:04, 49F
推
10/07 20:11, , 50F
10/07 20:11, 50F
推
10/07 21:40, , 51F
10/07 21:40, 51F
→
10/07 22:06, , 52F
10/07 22:06, 52F
推
10/07 22:08, , 53F
10/07 22:08, 53F
推
10/08 09:52, , 54F
10/08 09:52, 54F
→
10/08 10:03, , 55F
10/08 10:03, 55F
推
10/08 10:12, , 56F
10/08 10:12, 56F