[外絮] Inconsistent 4th-Quarter Minutes

看板Jeremy_Lin作者 (勝者的迷思)時間11年前 (2013/03/07 12:48), 編輯推噓34(36推 2噓 25→)
留言63則, 41人參與, 最新討論串1/1
[Bleacher Report 2/11/2013] http://tinyurl.com/bz8erdc Jeremy Lin's Inconsistent 4th-Quarter Minutes Continue to Stunt Development 林不穩定的末節上場時間持續阻礙他的發展 When the Houston Rockets acquired Jeremy Lin this offseason, many expected the rising star to become the organization's franchise player. James Harden's arrival and Kevin McHale's coaching tactics have since created a different path for Lin. Most notably, Lin's inconsistent fourth-quarter minutes continue to stunt his development. 當火箭去年買下林的時候，很多人都期待這名明日之星會成為隊上的關鍵人物。但哈登 的到來與McHale的戰術指導似乎讓林走上了另一條路線。 最值得注意的是，林不穩定的末節上場時間，持續讓他的發展受阻。 During the Houston Rockets' 117-111 loss to the Sacramento Kings, Lin saw one minute and 51 seconds of playing time during the fourth quarter. With that being said, Lin was also in foul trouble. Unfortunately, Lin seeing the bench late has been consistent regardless of foul trouble. 在上一場（2/10）火箭117-111 敗給國王時，林在第四節只上了1:51。雖說如此，當時 林是有犯規麻煩的。 但不幸的是，林就算沒有犯規麻煩，比賽第四節還是常常被冰。 This issue started in November, as Rockets assistant coach Kelvin Sampson claimed Lin was benched during fourth quarters because of his defense (via NBA.com). Since then, we've seen more of the same. The question is, what does Sampson believe improves when Lin is on the bench? 這問題起自去年十一月，當火箭的助理教練Kelvin Sampson表示林第四節被冰是因為他 的防守問題（根據NBA.com 的官方消息）。自從那時候起，我們就三不五時看到這個狀 況。 但問題是，Sampson 認為，把林冰在板凳上會換到什麼進步？ According to NBA.com, the Rockets are allowing 102.4 points per 48 minutes when Lin is on the floor. That numbers drops to 102.0 points per 48 when Lin is riding the pine. Not so fast. 根據NBA.com 的官方數據，林在場上時，火箭平均每48分鐘失掉102.4 分。林不在場上 的時候則低一點，102.0 分。 但別這麼快下定論。 NBA.com proceeds to report that the Rockets are allowing 103.9 points per 100 possessions with Lin on the floor. That number rises to 104.3 when Lin is off the floor. In other words, the Rockets are actually a better defensive team when Lin is on the floor. NBA.com 的後續報導則顯示，林在場上時，火箭平均每100 次持球丟掉103.9 分。林不 在場上時，這數字增加到104.3 分。 換句話說，當林在場上時，火箭的防守其實還比較好。 With this being known, it remains unclear as to why the Rockets would leave Lin on the bench. With all due respect to Patrick Beverley and Toney Douglas, it appears as if Lin has the higher ceiling. Until his minutes hit a more consistent level, Lin will continue to come up short of reaching his potential. 既知如此，我們還是不清楚為什麼火箭一定要把林冰起來。我無意冒犯比佛利或TD，但 林看起來是比較有潛力的。 除非林的上場時間能夠穩定下來，不然他會持續無法發揮出他擁有的潛力。 Develop or Give Up on Harden and Lin 繼續發展，要不就放掉哈林體系 Thus far in 2012-13, Jeremy Lin is averaging 18.3 points and 8.9 assists per 48 minutes in which James Harden is on the bench. When Harden is on the floor, those numbers drop to 12.9 points and 6.3 assists. Perhaps most concerning of all, Lin is shooting 43 percent from the floor and 28 percent from three with Harden on the floor. Those numbers jump to 47 percent from the field and 48 percent from distance when Harden is on the bench. 2012-13 賽季至今，林在場上而哈登休息時，平均每48分鐘得18.3分及8.9 助攻。兩人 同上時，林的數字減少到12.9分6.3 助攻。 或許最令人憂心的是，當兩人同上時，林的FG命中率是43% 而三分是28% ；哈登下去時 FG卻升到47% 而三分更達到48% 。 The Rockets must either abandon their current pairing of Harden and Lin altogether or commit to developing the tandem. From a financial perspective, the Rockets have committed to Harden and Lin as a duo. Lin averages roughly $8.4 million over the next three years, while Harden averages $16.0 million. Unfortunately, the minutes and strategy fail to match the money. 火箭要不就得放棄哈林連線的體系，要不就是得下功夫去培養他們之間的搭配。 從金錢的角度看來，火箭給林與哈登的薪資差不多相匹敵。林接下來三年年均840 萬鎂 而哈登是1600萬鎂。 不幸的是，無論上場時間或是場上戰術都無法值得上這筆錢。 The Rockets defer to Harden in virtually every scenario. This forces Lin, the point guard, to play off the ball and step in to play based off of his weaknesses. Lin is one of the league's better dribble penetrators, yet he's being forced to become a spot-up shooter. 火箭幾乎在任何情形下都是找哈登一個人。這逼著控衛林必須在無球狀態下打球，而這 正是他較弱的一環。 林的帶球切入在聯盟算是水準之上的，但是他被迫扮演一個定點射手的角色。 Until the Rockets' coaching staff figures out a way to use Lin on-ball and Harden off of it, the Harvard graduate will continue to struggle. Should a balance be created, however, both men can thrive. The ball is in coach Kevin McHale's court, in that sense. 除非火箭的教練組能夠想出一套方法，讓林能夠拿到球而哈登能少持球，不然這名哈佛 高材生大概要一直掙扎下去。然後，如果能找到平衡的話，兩個人都能有更佳的表現。 這樣看來McHale顯然應該採取行動了。 Proven Fourth-Quarter Performer 林是個可以信賴的第四節殺手 During the 2011-12 NBA regular season, Jeremy Lin shot 49.5 percent from the floor during the fourth quarter. He also converted 56.3 percent of his fourth-quarter three-point attempts. In other words, Lin was straight-up clutch. 在2011-12 年球季，林第四節的命中率是49.5%，三分更高達56.3% 。 換句話說，林完完全全就是個大心臟。 In 2012-13, Lin is fifth on the Houston Rockets in terms of fourth-quarter field-goal attempts. Surprisingly, second on the team is Toney Douglas. The backup point guard who has taken Lin's place come the fourth quarter. By comparison, Lin is shooting 41.7 percent on fourth-quarter field goals. Douglas rests at 39.4 percent in that capacity. So why not make the switch? 2012-13 球季，林在第四節的出手次數排名全隊第五。令人驚訝的是，全隊第二是TD。 替補控衛反而取代了本應屬於林的第四節殺手的角色。 但比較起來，林第四節的FG是41.7% ，TD則只有39.4% 。 那幹嘛不讓林上去勒？ Lin may not be performing at an All-Star caliber, but he's proven to be a player that shines in the spotlight. There is no brighter light than those that shine in the fourth quarter. So why not let Lin do what he does best and take over in the fourth quarter? 林可能還搆不到全明星的等級，但是他是那種在關鍵時刻可以發光的人。而且沒有哪些 場合，比起第四節能讓林更有發揮。 那幹嘛不讓林做他擅長的事，去接管整個第四節？ Until the Rockets allow Lin to thrive in his most comfortable setting, he will continue to struggle in Houston. The Harvard graduate thrives in clutch situations and is clearly at his best when the ball is in his hands. The question is, when will coach Kevin McHale allow him to play in the manner most comfortable to him? 除非火箭能讓林在他最擅長的情境下發展，不然他會在休士頓一直浮浮沉沉。這個哈佛 高材生本來就是最會打關鍵時刻，而且很明顯他在有球權的時候更能發揮。 問題是，McHale什麼時候才會讓林適性發展啊？？ -- ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ◢ ＤＥＵＴＳＣＨＬＡＮＤ ★◢█ by cgi0911 ★◢█◢ The Order of Black and White ★◢█◢█ The Glory of Three Stars ◢█◢█◢ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ◢█◢█◢█ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 208.105.95.2
推
03/07 12:50, , 1F
換教練比較快
03/07 12:50, 1F
推
03/07 12:50, , 2F
冰箱: I don't know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
03/07 12:50, 2F
推
03/07 12:51, , 3F
說實話我已經放棄Mcfail了 但他還有明年的約 SO..Lin自
03/07 12:51, 3F
推
03/07 12:51, , 4F
2/11的舊聞 McHale被打臉還是不知道痛啊
03/07 12:51, 4F
→
03/07 12:51, , 5F
己多保重吧= =
03/07 12:51, 5F
推
03/07 12:51, , 6F
......>///< GY教練
03/07 12:51, 6F
推
03/07 12:52, , 7F
Green arrow: McHale, you have failed Linsanity!
03/07 12:52, 7F
推
03/07 12:52, , 8F
GY教練 罰他回去看一百遍 雷霆VS火箭 第四節那次的哈林連線
03/07 12:52, 8F
推
03/07 12:52, , 9F
好文！
03/07 12:52, 9F
推
03/07 12:53, , 10F
再加上又有小AB來瓜分上場時間 唉...
03/07 12:53, 10F
推
03/07 12:53, , 11F
火箭打法有在培養哈林嗎 只有哈哈 買個吉祥物不過如此
03/07 12:53, 11F
推
03/07 12:53, , 12F
是舊文耶~~~這篇莫雷看過嗎??XDDD
03/07 12:53, 12F
推
03/07 12:54, , 13F
沒救了 冰箱也不是特別廢 但是對林個人發展來說是扣分
03/07 12:54, 13F
→
03/07 12:54, , 14F
又有把林找過來是在利用它的人氣的感受了
03/07 12:54, 14F
→
03/07 12:54, , 15F
第四節決勝期不讓他上 真的是不知道在想什麼
03/07 12:54, 15F
推
03/07 12:54, , 16F
1F中肯
03/07 12:54, 16F
推
03/07 12:54, , 17F
唉...
03/07 12:54, 17F
→
03/07 12:54, , 18F
況且又不是一次兩次 往往當天的也沒有表現不好
03/07 12:54, 18F
→
03/07 12:55, , 19F
因為他不會抗議 也尊重教練的決策 所以第四節就可以常常冰
03/07 12:55, 19F
→
03/07 12:56, , 20F
這樣根本是本末倒置 不先養8M的球員 而是先去養底薪的
03/07 12:56, 20F
推
03/07 12:56, , 21F
麥克丁丁臉皮這麼厚 再被怎麼打臉他應該也不痛不癢
03/07 12:56, 21F
推
03/07 12:57, , 22F
對替補球員來說 來火箭很爽 對先發來說就....
03/07 12:57, 22F
推
03/07 12:57, , 23F
真希望林可以自己爭取第四節上場...不要每次都這麼聽話= =
03/07 12:57, 23F
→
03/07 12:57, , 24F
或者說阿西和林都將被丟掉 所以有沒有養都無所謂...
03/07 12:57, 24F
→
03/07 12:58, , 25F
哈 我想看火箭10月來台沒林卻有冰箱 會是什麼場景？
03/07 12:58, 25F
推
03/07 12:59, , 26F
養不養是其次,該贏得比賽還是要贏阿...今天真的無言
03/07 12:59, 26F
→
03/07 13:00, , 27F
沒林有冰箱... 票房就是冰的啦
03/07 13:00, 27F
推
03/07 13:00, , 28F
人對討厭的人會特別放大他的錯誤
03/07 13:00, 28F
推
03/07 13:00, , 29F
推!換教練啦!
03/07 13:00, 29F
推
03/07 13:02, , 30F
這篇中肯啊...LIN在關鍵時刻的表現又不差，冰他幹麻啊
03/07 13:02, 30F
→
03/07 13:02, , 31F
這是Lin板 養不養Lin當然重要啊
03/07 13:02, 31F
推
03/07 13:04, , 32F
唉..歷史又重演了 火箭就是愛上演替補的逆襲 希望有莫雷和
03/07 13:04, 32F
推
03/07 13:04, , 33F
這篇中肯~ 但Mchale 就不信邪。頑固指數破表!!!
03/07 13:04, 33F
→
03/07 13:04, , 34F
冰箱能看到這篇文!
03/07 13:04, 34F
推
03/07 13:05, , 35F
可是六月就開始賣票了啊！萬一夏天來個交易我們不是欲哭無
03/07 13:05, 35F
→
03/07 13:05, , 36F
淚？QQ
03/07 13:05, 36F
→
03/07 13:05, , 37F
今天輸了，我想壓力一定會上來，等著看下一場吧~~冰箱活該!!
03/07 13:05, 37F
推
03/07 13:05, , 38F
推翻譯, 希望魔雷快點把冰箱賣去二手店
03/07 13:05, 38F
→
03/07 13:05, , 39F
不要說不可能，聽說2010年中國賽，籃網也是交易掉易建聯
03/07 13:05, 39F
→
03/07 13:06, , 40F
如果火箭10月來台沒林卻有冰箱 那買20.30萬票價的人...
03/07 13:06, 40F
推
03/07 13:07, , 41F
對林黑冰箱而言 這些評論他看不進去的啦 他就覺得林爛
03/07 13:07, 41F
噓
03/07 13:07, , 42F
幹你馬的啊就是歧視啊，幹幹幹幹幹幹幹，狗教練，幹
03/07 13:07, 42F
→
03/07 13:08, , 43F
樓上....你還好吧
03/07 13:08, 43F
→
03/07 13:08, , 44F
沒林有冰箱就改支持溜馬就好了阿 林被交易我也開心解脫
03/07 13:08, 44F
推
03/07 13:08, , 45F
超中肯!!!!!!
03/07 13:08, 45F
→
03/07 13:09, , 46F
我相信很多戰績不佳的球隊都對林有興趣的 比冰箱手下好
03/07 13:09, 46F
推
03/07 13:10, , 47F
買30萬的.. 那人可能會帶暗器進去...XDDDDDDD
03/07 13:10, 47F
推
03/07 13:11, , 48F
搞不好從PARSONS嘗到甜頭 想要在養出底薪可用球員 然
03/07 13:11, 48F
→
03/07 13:11, , 49F
對火箭沒什麼愛 沒有林我寧願看尼克
03/07 13:11, 49F
→
03/07 13:11, , 50F
後就可以把較高薪的交易出去 簽超級大咖
03/07 13:11, 50F
→
03/07 13:12, , 51F
樓上 我開始相信你了....
03/07 13:12, 51F
推
03/07 13:23, , 52F
有真勇者出來說話了 我敬你likesea
03/07 13:23, 52F
→
03/07 13:23, , 53F
要嘛 換教練 要嘛 交易LIN 拜託
03/07 13:23, 53F
推
03/07 13:24, , 54F
真勇者出來說話了 我敬你likesea
03/07 13:24, 54F
推
03/07 13:29, , 55F
1.翻譯得好 2.好文中肯 精闢 3.（大家已經說了）
03/07 13:29, 55F
推
03/07 13:29, , 56F
敬說真話的勇者！likesea ( ′▽`)-o█
03/07 13:29, 56F
→
03/07 13:30, , 57F
運動場上需要開特力不需要冰箱 是要直接喝的 而不是回冰
03/07 13:30, 57F
推
03/07 13:31, , 58F
有真勇者出來說話了 我敬你likesea
03/07 13:31, 58F
噓
03/07 13:45, , 59F
純噓教練!!!!!!
03/07 13:45, 59F
→
03/07 13:49, , 60F
換教練快刀斬亂麻
03/07 13:49, 60F
推
03/07 15:46, , 61F
我覺得像爵士應該是很樂意得到林吧...
03/07 15:46, 61F
→
03/07 16:56, , 62F
這篇可以借轉總板嗎?
03/07 16:56, 62F
※ snowwof:轉錄至看板 NBA 03/07 17:02
推
03/07 19:51, , 63F
馬的，如果LIN比冰箱還早離開火箭，我就詛咒火箭年年墊底！
03/07 19:51, 63F
‣ 更多 cgi0911 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1HE1morl (Jeremy_Lin)