[討論] 一篇評論(1/19火箭vs溜馬)
感謝plzsmile大提供~
原文 http://tinyurl.com/akrnmb2
翻譯 http://tieba.baidu.com/p/2109163657
譯者 LINspiring
只有翻譯Lin的部分
You certainly wouldn't have known that Jeremy Lin has been struggling to stay
north of 40 percent from the field this year. The Rockets' point guard scored
an efficient 10 points on 4-of-7 shooting. But from a starting point guard, the
Rockets simply needed more.
你一定不知道林書豪今年的命中率一直掙扎在略好於40%的樣子。這名火箭控衛今晚7中4高
效地拿下10分。但是對一位先發控衛而言,火箭需要他做的更多。
In a strange twist, the normally penetration-dependent Lin had an easier time
scoring from the perimeter than he did against the long arms of the Pacer
defenders. Whenever he got into the lane, Lin met with heavy resistance,
resulting in a few blocks, misses and turnovers.
與平常不同的是,這個通常依賴突破的林在外線輕鬆得分,勝過他直接對抗步行者的長臂
叢林。每次他突到禁區都遭遇到重防,以一些火鍋、不中或失誤收場。
But from long range, he made both of his triple tries and he knocked down a
shorter jumper as well. In addition to his 10 points, Lin posted five rebounds,
three assists and three turnovers.
但從遠距離來看,他三分球二中二,還完成了一次三分線內短一點的跳投。除了10分,他
還有5個籃板,3次助攻和3次失誤。
It may not be his fault, but the key problem with Lin's game was his
disappearance for long stretches. When he wasn't handling the ball, he drifted
over to the weak side and simply waited. He'd occasionally receive a skip pass
after the shot clock had wound down, but for the most part, he was invisible.
這也許不是他的錯誤,但關鍵問題在於他在相當長的時間裡都沒有存在感。當他無球的時
候,他轉移到弱側,然後就簡單地等著。他偶爾在24秒快用完的時候得到傳球,但在大多
數的時候,他變成了一個透明人。
Considering his efficient line despite a limited role, it might behoove the
Rockets to get him a little more involved. But, based on what he did tonight,
he gets a solid, but unspectacular grade.
考慮到他即使是打醬油的角色也還高效,火箭有必要讓他多參與到比賽中。但按照今晚他
的表現來打分,穩定可靠但是不亮眼。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.94.184
推
01/19 18:03, , 1F
01/19 18:03, 1F
推
01/19 18:05, , 2F
01/19 18:05, 2F
→
01/19 18:06, , 3F
01/19 18:06, 3F
→
01/19 18:07, , 4F
01/19 18:07, 4F
→
01/19 18:11, , 5F
01/19 18:11, 5F
→
01/19 18:11, , 6F
01/19 18:11, 6F
推
01/19 18:12, , 7F
01/19 18:12, 7F
→
01/19 18:12, , 8F
01/19 18:12, 8F
→
01/19 18:17, , 9F
01/19 18:17, 9F
推
01/19 18:20, , 10F
01/19 18:20, 10F
→
01/19 18:23, , 11F
01/19 18:23, 11F
推
01/19 18:24, , 12F
01/19 18:24, 12F
推
01/19 18:26, , 13F
01/19 18:26, 13F
推
01/19 18:27, , 14F
01/19 18:27, 14F
→
01/19 18:28, , 15F
01/19 18:28, 15F
→
01/19 18:29, , 16F
01/19 18:29, 16F
→
01/19 18:30, , 17F
01/19 18:30, 17F
→
01/19 18:30, , 18F
01/19 18:30, 18F
推
01/19 18:31, , 19F
01/19 18:31, 19F
→
01/19 18:32, , 20F
01/19 18:32, 20F
推
01/19 18:32, , 21F
01/19 18:32, 21F
推
01/19 18:53, , 22F
01/19 18:53, 22F
→
01/19 18:53, , 23F
01/19 18:53, 23F
推
01/19 19:02, , 24F
01/19 19:02, 24F
→
01/19 19:02, , 25F
01/19 19:02, 25F
→
01/19 19:02, , 26F
01/19 19:02, 26F
→
01/19 19:02, , 27F
01/19 19:02, 27F
→
01/19 19:03, , 28F
01/19 19:03, 28F
→
01/19 19:03, , 29F
01/19 19:03, 29F
推
01/19 19:09, , 30F
01/19 19:09, 30F
推
01/19 19:12, , 31F
01/19 19:12, 31F
推
01/19 19:19, , 32F
01/19 19:19, 32F
→
01/19 19:19, , 33F
01/19 19:19, 33F
→
01/19 19:20, , 34F
01/19 19:20, 34F
推
01/19 19:58, , 35F
01/19 19:58, 35F
推
01/19 20:05, , 36F
01/19 20:05, 36F
推
01/19 20:30, , 37F
01/19 20:30, 37F
→
01/19 20:31, , 38F
01/19 20:31, 38F
推
01/19 20:40, , 39F
01/19 20:40, 39F
→
01/19 20:43, , 40F
01/19 20:43, 40F
→
01/19 20:46, , 41F
01/19 20:46, 41F
推
01/19 20:48, , 42F
01/19 20:48, 42F
→
01/19 20:49, , 43F
01/19 20:49, 43F
推
01/19 20:49, , 44F
01/19 20:49, 44F
→
01/19 20:51, , 45F
01/19 20:51, 45F
→
01/19 20:59, , 46F
01/19 20:59, 46F
→
01/19 21:01, , 47F
01/19 21:01, 47F
→
01/19 21:36, , 48F
01/19 21:36, 48F
→
01/19 21:51, , 49F
01/19 21:51, 49F
推
01/19 22:55, , 50F
01/19 22:55, 50F
→
01/19 22:55, , 51F
01/19 22:55, 51F
→
01/19 22:57, , 52F
01/19 22:57, 52F
→
01/19 22:57, , 53F
01/19 22:57, 53F
推
01/19 23:14, , 54F
01/19 23:14, 54F
→
01/19 23:19, , 55F
01/19 23:19, 55F
推
01/20 00:39, , 56F
01/20 00:39, 56F
推
01/20 00:46, , 57F
01/20 00:46, 57F
推
01/20 07:53, , 58F
01/20 07:53, 58F