Fw: [外電] J.Lin is no match for Derrick Rose
※ [本文轉錄自 Knicks 看板 #1FNlXz0R ]
作者: djviva (淡定~ 穩中求勝) 看板: Knicks
標題: [外電] J.Lin is no match for Derrick Rose
時間: Tue Mar 13 15:34:18 2012
想說看看芝加哥當地的報紙對這場比賽的看法..結果.... >"<
http://tinyurl.com/6sobr4e from Chicago Sun-Times
Jeremy Lin is no match for Derrick Rose
林書豪一點也比不上風城玫瑰
Poor Jeremy Lin. The guy can ball. OK? That’s for real.
可憐的林書豪, 這家伙會打球嗎? 嗯..好像會吧
But his Harvard coach once said he’s the weakest player he’d ever seen.
但林書豪的哈佛教練再一次的表示, 林書豪是他看過最弱的球員
ps.真的有這樣說過嗎??
And that lack of pure muscularity enabled Derrick Rose to attack the rim
almost at will against the Knicks on Monday night.
林不夠強壯的身體, 讓玫瑰今晚恣意的攻擊籃框
Before this game, Rose had seemed to be in a deep trance. He’d heard all the
Linsanity stuff, but he didn’t want to talk to the media about it. He just
wanted to show what he does best, just like Lin, ball.
這場比賽之前, Rose的表現似乎沒醒過來, 他聽到一堆關於Linanity的事但不想表
達任何看法, 只想上場打球用表現證明一切
And with six minutes left in the seesaw game, Rose exploded down the middle
in a way that was frightening even for this young man with the blank face and
rocket-propelled legs. He took a bounce pass from Joakim Noah, then got up
and up in pure ferocious defiance and threw down a power dunk the likes of
which we have seen only when Michael Jordan ruled the city.
這場拉鋸戰最後六分鐘時, Rose大爆發震懾一切, 接獲Noah的回傳球, 然後縱身跳躍
, 越來越高越來越高, 在空中蔑視萬物然後兇殘的大灌籃, 一如我們印象中Jordan曾
做過的那樣..
Lin, the Taiwanese-American sensation who’s a very good ballplayer, but a
very flawed one, too, cannot possibly compete with Rose. When you have
another foot of vertical to deal with, when the air becomes your floor, who
can play with you?
知名的林書豪, 這個台裔美國人是個很不錯的籃球員, 但也是很有缺點的籃球員, 根
本不可能跟Rose對抗. 當你能飛的這樣高, 誰能打的贏你?
In fact, Rose’s basketball skills are dominant, but his athleticism puts him
in a realm that only superstars such as Dwyane Wade and LeBron James and
maybe Chris Paul can deal with.
事實上, Rose的籃球技巧太有主宰力了, 但是他的運動天份將Rose置於一個只有熱火的
典偉 & 劉寶傑才能匹敵的殿堂. 或許CP3也可以吧
The two Sports Illustrated covers, the overhyped New York newspaper
headlines, the Spike Lee-led Big Apple Army of Screamers, the Asian Americans
and NBA fans, generally, who were so thrilled with the sudden ascendancy of
Lin — it only made his legacy impossible to fulfill. And all this after only
three weeks of great performances.
所有林獲得到過的榮耀跟光環, 都隱喻了無法實現的美夢, 而這夢, 最終只持續了三周
Lin has a very nice jumper, perfect form on his free throws, wonderful eyes
that see all the court and a warrior’s mentality. But he’s limited when
going to his left —Rose overplayed him one time by a full body width — and
he doesn’t have great ups and he is, quite simply, rather frail.
林書豪有著很優秀的跳躍力, 罰球也優, 全場視野佳以及擁有戰士般的精神戰力
林的缺點: 不會左線, 跳投不夠好, 攻勢簡單, 身體更是弱
Late in the first quarter, Rose beat him on a drive, and Lin recovered
swiftly enough to shockingly block Rose’s shot.
捧Rose也無法不提林這個火鍋
He finished with 32 points, seven assists and six rebounds. Lin had a decent
line — 15 points, eight assists and three steals — but it was not rare, not
other-worldly at all.
Rose得32分7助攻6籃板, 林只拿了中規中矩的15分8助攻3抄截, 已經不再是另一個世界
數據了
Rose was somewhere on another planet, especially on that dunk that resonates
yet. 但Rose是那美克星人, 特別是最後那個飛身灌籃的摩門特
Some players are good. Some are great. And some want the whole world to know.
That would be Rose. 有夠誇張
--------------------------------------------
沒想到芝加哥把rose當成神來拜
對位的控衛(Lin)被評的一文不值...
怎麼沒提Rose 今晚精美的失誤 & 火鍋咧
都飛的這樣高了怎麼還會被煽這麼多火鍋??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.250.135.187
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: djviva (60.250.135.187), 時間: 03/13/2012 15:35:49
推
03/13 15:36, , 1F
03/13 15:36, 1F
推
03/13 15:37, , 2F
03/13 15:37, 2F
推
03/13 15:37, , 3F
03/13 15:37, 3F
推
03/13 15:37, , 4F
03/13 15:37, 4F
→
03/13 15:38, , 5F
03/13 15:38, 5F
推
03/13 15:38, , 6F
03/13 15:38, 6F
推
03/13 15:38, , 7F
03/13 15:38, 7F
→
03/13 15:38, , 8F
03/13 15:38, 8F
推
03/13 15:38, , 9F
03/13 15:38, 9F
推
03/13 15:38, , 10F
03/13 15:38, 10F
→
03/13 15:39, , 11F
03/13 15:39, 11F
推
03/13 15:39, , 12F
03/13 15:39, 12F
推
03/13 15:39, , 13F
03/13 15:39, 13F
推
03/13 15:39, , 14F
03/13 15:39, 14F
推
03/13 15:40, , 15F
03/13 15:40, 15F
→
03/13 15:40, , 16F
03/13 15:40, 16F
推
03/13 15:40, , 17F
03/13 15:40, 17F
推
03/13 15:40, , 18F
03/13 15:40, 18F
→
03/13 15:40, , 19F
03/13 15:40, 19F
→
03/13 15:40, , 20F
03/13 15:40, 20F
→
03/13 15:40, , 21F
03/13 15:40, 21F
→
03/13 15:40, , 22F
03/13 15:40, 22F
→
03/13 15:41, , 23F
03/13 15:41, 23F
推
03/13 15:41, , 24F
03/13 15:41, 24F
→
03/13 15:41, , 25F
03/13 15:41, 25F
推
03/13 15:42, , 26F
03/13 15:42, 26F
推
03/13 15:42, , 27F
03/13 15:42, 27F
推
03/13 15:42, , 28F
03/13 15:42, 28F
→
03/13 15:42, , 29F
03/13 15:42, 29F
推
03/13 15:42, , 30F
03/13 15:42, 30F
→
03/13 15:42, , 31F
03/13 15:42, 31F
推
03/13 15:42, , 32F
03/13 15:42, 32F
推
03/13 15:44, , 33F
03/13 15:44, 33F
推
03/13 15:44, , 34F
03/13 15:44, 34F
推
03/13 15:44, , 35F
03/13 15:44, 35F
→
03/13 15:44, , 36F
03/13 15:44, 36F
推
03/13 15:46, , 37F
03/13 15:46, 37F
→
03/13 15:46, , 38F
03/13 15:46, 38F
推
03/13 15:46, , 39F
03/13 15:46, 39F
還有 110 則推文
→
03/13 17:27, , 150F
03/13 17:27, 150F
推
03/13 17:30, , 151F
03/13 17:30, 151F
推
03/13 17:35, , 152F
03/13 17:35, 152F
→
03/13 17:37, , 153F
03/13 17:37, 153F
推
03/13 17:40, , 154F
03/13 17:40, 154F
→
03/13 17:40, , 155F
03/13 17:40, 155F
推
03/13 17:42, , 156F
03/13 17:42, 156F
推
03/13 17:43, , 157F
03/13 17:43, 157F
→
03/13 17:44, , 158F
03/13 17:44, 158F
→
03/13 18:02, , 159F
03/13 18:02, 159F
推
03/13 18:28, , 160F
03/13 18:28, 160F
→
03/13 18:54, , 161F
03/13 18:54, 161F
→
03/13 18:55, , 162F
03/13 18:55, 162F
→
03/13 18:58, , 163F
03/13 18:58, 163F
噓
03/13 19:00, , 164F
03/13 19:00, 164F
推
03/13 19:10, , 165F
03/13 19:10, 165F
推
03/13 19:20, , 166F
03/13 19:20, 166F
推
03/13 19:20, , 167F
03/13 19:20, 167F
推
03/13 19:24, , 168F
03/13 19:24, 168F
→
03/13 19:25, , 169F
03/13 19:25, 169F
推
03/13 19:26, , 170F
03/13 19:26, 170F
推
03/13 19:34, , 171F
03/13 19:34, 171F
推
03/13 19:52, , 172F
03/13 19:52, 172F
推
03/13 19:55, , 173F
03/13 19:55, 173F
→
03/13 19:56, , 174F
03/13 19:56, 174F
→
03/13 20:01, , 175F
03/13 20:01, 175F
推
03/13 20:04, , 176F
03/13 20:04, 176F
→
03/13 20:05, , 177F
03/13 20:05, 177F
→
03/13 20:45, , 178F
03/13 20:45, 178F
推
03/13 21:18, , 179F
03/13 21:18, 179F
推
03/13 21:27, , 180F
03/13 21:27, 180F
→
03/13 21:27, , 181F
03/13 21:27, 181F
推
03/13 22:01, , 182F
03/13 22:01, 182F
推
03/13 22:49, , 183F
03/13 22:49, 183F
→
03/13 23:25, , 184F
03/13 23:25, 184F
→
03/13 23:26, , 185F
03/13 23:26, 185F
→
03/13 23:27, , 186F
03/13 23:27, 186F
→
03/13 23:29, , 187F
03/13 23:29, 187F
推
03/14 19:34, , 188F
03/14 19:34, 188F
推
03/14 23:11, , 189F
03/14 23:11, 189F