[新聞] 史丹利:和服體驗有錯嗎 蘋果日報1050505
蘋果日報 2016年5月5日
史丹利:和服體驗有錯嗎
日前有個作家寫了篇文來說明他在京都旅遊的看法,大致上就是觀光客太多破壞景觀,然
後台灣人不會穿和服又愛穿,穿和服的身形儀態都不對,還有廉價粗製濫造的和服破壞美
景等,最後歸結到台灣美學的失敗。
美學是沒有標準很主觀的東西,所以先不討論,我比較想說的是,為什麼是一個台灣人抱
怨這些事情呢?那文章描述的事並不是什麼沒禮貌或犯罪的事,又何必要以自己的標準來
抱怨這些?我是不知道京都當地人是不是有不爽,但看著和服出租店一家家的開,觀光客
每天一樣多,我想他們應該也不至於厭惡這些事情吧?
如果真覺得觀光客體驗和服會破壞景致,那我想他們就不會提供這樣的服務,如果怕觀光
客太多影響當地人的旅遊品質,那他們可以把票價調高或用其他方法,但他們都沒有這樣
做,那為何是一個外人來批評這樣的事情?
據我在京都住很久的朋友告訴我,日本人賞花也不穿太高貴的和服,畢竟和服也是有很多
款式,出遊賞花穿一種叫「小紋」的和服,算是和服裡的休閒款,而店家提供體驗的和服
大多也都是這種「小紋」款,並不像該作家說的「不像和服的和服」。
對觀光客別太苛求
更不用說和服體驗都只有台灣人了,我至少遇過中國人、香港人、甚至泰國人或西方人,
如果說台灣人不適合和服的話,那老外們怎麼樣都比台灣人不適合吧?
當然我同意穿上和服的舉手投足要更有味道這回事,這樣才可凸顯和服的美,但這要真心
喜歡才會去注意,對只想嘗鮮的觀光客就請別太苛求啊!
新聞連結:http://goo.gl/2GSNp5
==========================================================
日本旅遊就是要和服體驗,不然在台灣穿和服在街上走不是更怪?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.127.157.156
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Japan_Travel/M.1462414986.A.3FB.html
噓
05/05 10:27, , 1F
05/05 10:27, 1F
→
05/05 10:28, , 2F
05/05 10:28, 2F
→
05/05 10:30, , 3F
05/05 10:30, 3F
→
05/05 10:30, , 4F
05/05 10:30, 4F
→
05/05 10:31, , 5F
05/05 10:31, 5F
推
05/05 10:31, , 6F
05/05 10:31, 6F
推
05/05 10:32, , 7F
05/05 10:32, 7F
→
05/05 10:33, , 8F
05/05 10:33, 8F
→
05/05 10:33, , 9F
05/05 10:33, 9F
→
05/05 10:34, , 10F
05/05 10:34, 10F
→
05/05 10:34, , 11F
05/05 10:34, 11F
→
05/05 10:35, , 12F
05/05 10:35, 12F
→
05/05 10:36, , 13F
05/05 10:36, 13F
→
05/05 10:37, , 14F
05/05 10:37, 14F
→
05/05 10:39, , 15F
05/05 10:39, 15F
→
05/05 10:39, , 16F
05/05 10:39, 16F
→
05/05 10:40, , 17F
05/05 10:40, 17F
→
05/05 10:45, , 18F
05/05 10:45, 18F
推
05/05 10:49, , 19F
05/05 10:49, 19F
→
05/05 10:49, , 20F
05/05 10:49, 20F
推
05/05 10:55, , 21F
05/05 10:55, 21F
→
05/05 10:56, , 22F
05/05 10:56, 22F
推
05/05 10:58, , 23F
05/05 10:58, 23F
推
05/05 10:58, , 24F
05/05 10:58, 24F
推
05/05 10:59, , 25F
05/05 10:59, 25F
推
05/05 11:01, , 26F
05/05 11:01, 26F
噓
05/05 11:01, , 27F
05/05 11:01, 27F
推
05/05 11:01, , 28F
05/05 11:01, 28F
→
05/05 11:02, , 29F
05/05 11:02, 29F
→
05/05 11:05, , 30F
05/05 11:05, 30F
推
05/05 11:16, , 31F
05/05 11:16, 31F
推
05/05 11:19, , 32F
05/05 11:19, 32F
→
05/05 11:22, , 33F
05/05 11:22, 33F
→
05/05 11:22, , 34F
05/05 11:22, 34F
→
05/05 11:22, , 35F
05/05 11:22, 35F
→
05/05 11:22, , 36F
05/05 11:22, 36F
→
05/05 11:23, , 37F
05/05 11:23, 37F
→
05/05 11:27, , 38F
05/05 11:27, 38F
→
05/05 11:28, , 39F
05/05 11:28, 39F
→
05/05 11:28, , 40F
05/05 11:28, 40F
推
05/05 11:56, , 41F
05/05 11:56, 41F
→
05/05 11:56, , 42F
05/05 11:56, 42F
→
05/05 11:57, , 43F
05/05 11:57, 43F
→
05/05 11:58, , 44F
05/05 11:58, 44F
→
05/05 11:58, , 45F
05/05 11:58, 45F
→
05/05 12:01, , 46F
05/05 12:01, 46F
→
05/05 12:01, , 47F
05/05 12:01, 47F
→
05/05 12:01, , 48F
05/05 12:01, 48F
噓
05/05 12:19, , 49F
05/05 12:19, 49F
→
05/05 12:19, , 50F
05/05 12:19, 50F
推
05/05 12:25, , 51F
05/05 12:25, 51F
→
05/05 12:26, , 52F
05/05 12:26, 52F
→
05/05 12:27, , 53F
05/05 12:27, 53F
推
05/05 12:27, , 54F
05/05 12:27, 54F
→
05/05 12:27, , 55F
05/05 12:27, 55F
→
05/05 12:29, , 56F
05/05 12:29, 56F
→
05/05 13:04, , 57F
05/05 13:04, 57F
推
05/05 13:06, , 58F
05/05 13:06, 58F
推
05/05 13:08, , 59F
05/05 13:08, 59F
→
05/05 13:08, , 60F
05/05 13:08, 60F
推
05/05 14:47, , 61F
05/05 14:47, 61F
推
05/05 17:49, , 62F
05/05 17:49, 62F
推
05/05 17:55, , 63F
05/05 17:55, 63F
推
05/05 18:05, , 64F
05/05 18:05, 64F
→
05/05 18:07, , 65F
05/05 18:07, 65F
→
05/05 18:10, , 66F
05/05 18:10, 66F
推
05/05 18:36, , 67F
05/05 18:36, 67F
→
05/05 18:36, , 68F
05/05 18:36, 68F
推
05/05 19:06, , 69F
05/05 19:06, 69F
→
05/05 19:06, , 70F
05/05 19:06, 70F
→
05/05 19:46, , 71F
05/05 19:46, 71F
推
05/05 20:14, , 72F
05/05 20:14, 72F
→
05/05 20:14, , 73F
05/05 20:14, 73F
推
05/05 23:23, , 74F
05/05 23:23, 74F
→
05/05 23:23, , 75F
05/05 23:23, 75F
→
05/05 23:23, , 76F
05/05 23:23, 76F
推
05/06 00:04, , 77F
05/06 00:04, 77F
推
05/06 00:10, , 78F
05/06 00:10, 78F
推
05/06 15:12, , 79F
05/06 15:12, 79F