[外電] Hamilton and Iverson couldn’t coexist
Source: http://0rz.tw/kmL5V
*********************************************************************
哈米頓與艾佛森無法同時共存
By Dan Feldman - 2:50 am | May 28th, 2009
*********************************************************************
Besides a few minutes against Houston in January, it was clear Richard
Hamilton and Allen Iverson didn’t complement each other on the court. Both
commanded the ball, and neither provided much the other didn’t.
Prompted by a comment from a “Bubachuck,” I did some digging into last
season’s numbers.
作者針對本議題查了一些資料：
Pistons with Iverson and not Hamilton: 6-2 (.750, equivalent to 62 wins
during a full season)
當活塞+艾佛森 沒有RIP時： 成績是6勝2敗。(7成5的勝率)
Pistons with Hamilton and not Iverson: 14-7 (.667, 55 wins)
當活塞+哈米頓 沒有AI時： 成績是 14勝7敗。(6成67的勝率)
Pistons with both: 18-28 (.391, 32 wins)
當活塞同時有AI+RIP時： 成績是 18勝28敗。(3成91的勝率)
Pistons with neither: 1-6 (.143, 12 wins)
當活塞同時缺AI+RIP時： 成績是1勝6敗。(1成43的勝率)
I think this means a couple of things.
1. Rumors of Iverson’s demise might (emphasis on might) be exaggerated.
2. Detroit didn’t combust as much as it appears. If the Pistons had another
role player instead of Iverson, they probably would have been pretty good.
Could Joe Dumars’s have convinced Denver to throw in Linas Kleiza or Chris
Andersen? Add one of them and cut Iverson immediately, Detroit probably would
have been the fifth, maybe even fourth, seed.
*********************************************************************
數據是會說話的，可見AI若有被重用，活塞這一季結果一定不一樣.....
--
Only the strong survive- Iverson ⊕ ═█┘
⊕ ●╱ Ｗ
● ●︵ ● ●)) ３╯
<３\ /３⊕ ／３﹚ ３ \\
/>⊕ >/ ⊕ ╲> >>
========= http://www.wretch.cc/blog/AWEI3 =========
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 58.114.81.191
推
06/04 17:59, , 1F
06/04 17:59, 1F
推
06/04 18:14, , 2F
06/04 18:14, 2F
推
06/04 19:28, , 3F
06/04 19:28, 3F
→
06/04 23:07, , 4F
06/04 23:07, 4F