[新聞] Harvard University says it can't afford journal publishers' prices
標題:
Harvard University says it can't afford journal publishers' prices
新聞來源: (須有正確連結)
http://0rz.tw/FM72s
Exasperated by rising subscription costs charged by academic publishers,
Harvard University has encouraged its faculty members to make their research
freely available through open access journals and to resign from publications
that keep articles behind paywalls.
A memo from Harvard Library to the university's 2,100 teaching and research
staff called for action after warning it could no longer afford the price
hikes imposed by many large journal publishers, which bill the library around
$3.5m a year.
The extraordinary move thrusts one of the world's wealthiest and most
prestigious institutions into the centre of an increasingly fraught debate
over access to the results of academic research, much of which is funded by
the taxpayer.
The outcome of Harvard's decision to take on the publishers will be watched
closely by major universities around the world and is likely to prompt others
to follow suit.
The memo from Harvard's faculty advisory council said major publishers had
created an "untenable situation" at the university by making scholarly
interaction "fiscally unsustainable" and "academically restrictive", while
drawing profits of 35% or more. Prices for online access to articles from two
major publishers have increased 145% over the past six years, with some
journals costing as much as $40,000, the memo said.
More than 10,000 academics have already joined a boycott of Elsevier, the
huge Dutch publisher, in protest at its journal pricing and access policies.
Many university libraries pay more than half of their journal budgets to the
publishers Elsevier, Springer and Wiley.
Robert Darnton, director of Harvard Library told the Guardian: "I hope that
other universities will take similar action. We all face the same paradox. We
faculty do the research, write the papers, referee papers by other
researchers, serve on editorial boards, all of it for free … and then we buy
back the results of our labour at outrageous prices.
"The system is absurd, and it is inflicting terrible damage on libraries. One
year's subscription to The Journal of Comparative Neurology costs the same as
300 monographs. We simply cannot go on paying the increase in subscription
prices. In the long run, the answer will be open-access journal publishing,
but we need concerted effort to reach that goal."
In traditional journal publishing, researchers submit articles to editors who
send them out for peer review, a task that is usually unpaid. The final
versions of the articles are then formatted and sold back to university
libraries. Open access comes in various guises, but one model requires
authors to pay to have their articles published and made freely available to
anyone.
According to the Harvard memo, journal subscriptions are now so high that to
continue them "would seriously erode collection efforts in many other areas,
already compromised". The memo asks faculty members to encourage their
professional organisations to take control of scholarly publishing, and to
consider submitting their work to open access journals and resigning from
editorial boards of journals that are not open access.
It adds that the library must insist on transparent contracts that prevent
universities from discussing in public the fees they pay certain publishers.
In a statement to the Guardian, Elsevier said: "The Harvard Faculty Advisory
Council letter does not specify any specific publisher. We have a good
relationship with the Harvard libraries and have recently concluded an
agreement we believe works for them as it gives them the flexibility to
choose the titles they want.
"We do not believe that the facts in the letter which relate to price
increases pertain to Elsevier. Elsevier's average print list price increases
have consistently been among the lowest in the industry for the past several
years, averaging around 5%."
The statement concluded: "We believe Harvard will continue to see the value
in publishing in Elsevier journals, which include a range of access options,
and contributing as editors."
David Prosser, executive director of Research Libraries UK (RLUK), said:
"Harvard has one of the richest libraries in the world. If Harvard can't
afford to purchase all the journals their researchers need, what hope do the
rest of us have?
"There's always been a problem with this being seen as a library budget
issue. The memo from Harvard makes clear that it's bigger than that. It's at
the heart of education and research. If you can't get access to the
literature, it hurts research."
RLUK negotiated new contracts with Elsevier and Wiley last year after the
group threatened to cancel large subscriptions to the publishers. The new
deal, organised on behalf of 30 member libraries, is expected to save UK
institutions more than £20m.
"The better deals have given us a little breathing space, but they don't
solve the problem. There is a long-term structural problem with this market
that isn't going to be solved that simply," Prosser said.
Heather Joseph, executive director of the Scholarly Publishing and Academic
Resources Coalition, a US-based international library membership
organisation, said other universities may follow Harvard's lead.
"Highlighting the role of the faculty is exactly what we need to do.
Libraries have been trying to ring the alarm bell about this for a while, but
it's the faculty members who are the producers and consumers of the articles.
They have got the keys to making significant change in this market. Having
Harvard call this out in front of the faculty is a very significant move."
She added: "Other universities are likely to follow Harvard's example on
this. If it starts at a university with the stature of Harvard, they will
take a long hard look at whether this is something that makes sense for them
to do as well. People watch Harvard. There's no grey area there."
--
這篇裡還連到另一連結
http://0rz.tw/FOJNf
裡頭提到
Academic publishers charge UK universities about £200m a year to access
scientific journals, almost a tenth of the £2.2bn distributed to them by the
government, via the funding councils, for the basic running costs of
university research.
英國各大學每年約花費台幣94億的天價,在各個期刊的訂閱上
The big three publishing houses – Elsevier, Springer and Wiley – own most
of the world's more than 20,000 academic journals and account for about 42%
of all journal articles published. And, even as library budgets over the past
few years in the UK and North America have been flat or declining, journal
prices have been rising by 5-7% a year or more.
以及價格以每年5~7%的速度提高
原因很簡單,因為各國有無數的公立大專院校 會很自然的浪費預算
部份有眼光的出版商們預測到了 無論價格訂得再高
這些大專院校們都會買 反正該國的全民買單 當然開越高價越好
還沒意識到的無政府補助的學校 為了許多被壟斷的好期刊 也只好跟著買
直到如今如哈佛等學校 才意識到這情形
變成是各個有訂這些期刊的公立大專院校所在的該國人民們
被強迫虧錢給幾間出版商賺取暴利
這也是政府管制 造成全民賠錢與災難的好例子
※每日每人發文、上限量為十篇,超過會劣文請注意
⊕標題選用"新聞",請確切在標題與新聞來源處填入,否則可無條件移除(本行可移除)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 124.9.162.61
※ 編輯: author 來自: 124.9.162.61 (04/29 00:54)
推
04/29 01:30, , 1F
04/29 01:30, 1F
推
04/29 01:32, , 2F
04/29 01:32, 2F
推
04/29 06:14, , 3F
04/29 06:14, 3F
※ 編輯: author 來自: 124.9.162.61 (04/29 08:05)
→
04/29 08:05, , 4F
04/29 08:05, 4F
→
04/29 09:28, , 5F
04/29 09:28, 5F
→
04/29 09:31, , 6F
04/29 09:31, 6F
→
04/29 09:32, , 7F
04/29 09:32, 7F
→
04/29 09:33, , 8F
04/29 09:33, 8F
→
04/29 09:33, , 9F
04/29 09:33, 9F
噓
10/04 23:21, , 10F
10/04 23:21, 10F
→
08/13 10:14, , 11F
08/13 10:14, 11F
→
09/17 05:00, , 12F
09/17 05:00, 12F