[心得] 關於前面奇犽的討論串
(首先,不是應該是"剖析"嗎?......)
(一進板看到一整面錯字真的很痛苦......)
在很多資訊都還不足的情況下,
應該還沒有辦法肯定的判斷猗犽的攻擊所造成的傷害程度吧?
同樣的文本,在不同讀者的解讀下會有完全不同的意義出現,
(抱歉,文學概論唸的有點累......)
當有不能相容的兩種/多種說法出現時,除非原作者跳出來放炮,
不然文本(text)(XD)的開放性就是如此......
不過通常都是經典大作才會有這麼激烈的論戰不是嗎XD
(以上部分我也不知道算不算有內容XD)
(那就寫一點個人觀感好了)
就目前現有材料,
1.猗犽攻擊的速度讓對方不及閃避
2.猗犽還沒打敗對方,暫時撤退
所以我不認為猗犽會輸,但也沒把握他會贏
(馬的我好像還是沒什麼內容XD)
--
█╗ █╗ █╗ ███╗ ███╗████╗████╗████╗
█║ █║ █║█╔══█╗╚█╔╝█╔══╝█╔══╝█╔══█╗
█║ █║ █║█║ ╚╝ █║ ███╗ ███╗ ████╔╝
█║ █╗█╚══█║█║ █╗ █║ █╔═╝ █╔═╝ █╔█╔╝
████║╚███╔╝╚███╔╝███╗█║ ████╗█║╚██╗
╚═══╝ ╚══╝ ╚══╝ ╚══╝╚╝ ╚═══╝╚╝ ╚═╝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.57.150.187
→
10/12 23:11, , 1F
10/12 23:11, 1F
→
10/12 23:12, , 2F
10/12 23:12, 2F
推
10/12 23:16, , 3F
10/12 23:16, 3F
推
10/12 23:16, , 4F
10/12 23:16, 4F
推
10/12 23:19, , 5F
10/12 23:19, 5F
→
10/12 23:21, , 6F
10/12 23:21, 6F
推
10/12 23:27, , 7F
10/12 23:27, 7F
推
10/12 23:37, , 8F
10/12 23:37, 8F
sorry, sigh~
※ 編輯: TheLucifer 來自: 61.57.150.187 (10/13 00:18)
推
10/13 00:25, , 9F
10/13 00:25, 9F
推
10/13 00:40, , 10F
10/13 00:40, 10F
推
10/13 04:43, , 11F
10/13 04:43, 11F
→
10/13 07:27, , 12F
10/13 07:27, 12F
→
10/13 12:59, , 13F
10/13 12:59, 13F
→
10/13 13:33, , 14F
10/13 13:33, 14F
→
10/13 13:34, , 15F
10/13 13:34, 15F
推
10/13 14:13, , 16F
10/13 14:13, 16F
→
10/13 14:13, , 17F
10/13 14:13, 17F
→
10/13 14:53, , 18F
10/13 14:53, 18F
推
10/13 15:07, , 19F
10/13 15:07, 19F
→
10/13 15:34, , 20F
10/13 15:34, 20F
→
10/13 15:36, , 21F
10/13 15:36, 21F
→
10/13 15:36, , 22F
10/13 15:36, 22F
→
10/13 20:19, , 23F
10/13 20:19, 23F
→
10/13 20:33, , 24F
10/13 20:33, 24F
→
10/13 20:51, , 25F
10/13 20:51, 25F
噓
10/14 15:36, , 26F
10/14 15:36, 26F
→
10/14 20:03, , 27F
10/14 20:03, 27F
→
10/14 20:03, , 28F
10/14 20:03, 28F
→
10/14 20:22, , 29F
10/14 20:22, 29F