[閒聊] 暴雪是不是太低估棄牌的副作用了
這幾次的改版一直把術士往棄牌的方向帶
目前有幾隻棄牌的生物
1.魅魔 2/4/3 戰吼:捨棄一張牌
這隻的體質相當於一隻優良的三費怪,棄牌在這隻生物上價值-1費
2.夜色陣圖書管理員 2/3/2 戰吼:捨棄一張牌,死聲:抽一張牌
死聲抽牌的價值根據掠寶囤積者2/2/1和腐化的囤積者4/4/2來看,大約是1費
管理員本身不虧體質所以暴雪應該是認為捨棄一張牌的價值等同抽一張牌的價值
棄牌在這隻生物上也大概是-1費
3.拉卡利惡魔犬 4/3/8 嘲諷 戰吼:捨棄兩張牌
這隻就體質來看大約等同6費中立生物,棄兩張的價值是-2費
4.末日守衛 5/5/7 衝鋒 戰吼:捨棄兩張牌
就體質上末日守衛價值大概5.5費,衝鋒根據柯爾克隆精英來看,職業衝鋒卡為1費
所以就效果來看等同6.5費,棄兩張牌的價值為-1.5費
棄牌的好處是可以讓低費打出高費效果的卡,還有機率觸發這幾次改版的棄牌特效
棄牌缺點很多
1.損失牌差
2.有可能丟掉關鍵卡
這兩個缺點導致棄牌相關的卡不能隨便打出,因為有很大的機率造成對戰的崩盤
但棄牌帶來的好處不足以彌補它所帶來的缺點,因為補償的體質不夠
特效發動的隨機性太高
我認為目前棄一張牌的價值應該是-1.5費
暴雪應該上修棄牌生物的體質,或是下降棄牌的隨機性
所以暴雪是不是太低估棄牌所帶來的副作用了?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 157.182.253.243
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Hearthstone/M.1501256925.A.7E6.html
→
07/28 23:50, , 1F
07/28 23:50, 1F
推
07/28 23:50, , 2F
07/28 23:50, 2F
→
07/28 23:51, , 3F
07/28 23:51, 3F
推
07/28 23:51, , 4F
07/28 23:51, 4F
推
07/28 23:51, , 5F
07/28 23:51, 5F
推
07/28 23:52, , 6F
07/28 23:52, 6F
降低隨機性不見得要指定啊,可以是費用最低的那張或是最左邊那張這樣
※ 編輯: patchiang13 (157.182.253.243), 07/28/2017 23:53:35
推
07/28 23:53, , 7F
07/28 23:53, 7F
→
07/28 23:53, , 8F
07/28 23:53, 8F
推
07/28 23:53, , 9F
07/28 23:53, 9F
→
07/28 23:53, , 10F
07/28 23:53, 10F
推
07/28 23:53, , 11F
07/28 23:53, 11F
推
07/28 23:53, , 12F
07/28 23:53, 12F
推
07/28 23:54, , 13F
07/28 23:54, 13F
→
07/28 23:54, , 14F
07/28 23:54, 14F
推
07/28 23:54, , 15F
07/28 23:54, 15F
噓
07/28 23:56, , 16F
07/28 23:56, 16F
推
07/28 23:57, , 17F
07/28 23:57, 17F
→
07/28 23:58, , 18F
07/28 23:58, 18F
→
07/28 23:58, , 19F
07/28 23:58, 19F
推
07/28 23:58, , 20F
07/28 23:58, 20F
推
07/28 23:58, , 21F
07/28 23:58, 21F
→
07/28 23:59, , 22F
07/28 23:59, 22F
→
07/28 23:59, , 23F
07/28 23:59, 23F
推
07/29 00:00, , 24F
07/29 00:00, 24F
→
07/29 00:01, , 25F
07/29 00:01, 25F
推
07/29 00:01, , 26F
07/29 00:01, 26F
推
07/29 00:03, , 27F
07/29 00:03, 27F
推
07/29 00:04, , 28F
07/29 00:04, 28F
推
07/29 00:04, , 29F
07/29 00:04, 29F
推
07/29 00:05, , 30F
07/29 00:05, 30F
→
07/29 00:06, , 31F
07/29 00:06, 31F
→
07/29 00:07, , 32F
07/29 00:07, 32F
→
07/29 00:08, , 33F
07/29 00:08, 33F
推
07/29 00:10, , 34F
07/29 00:10, 34F
推
07/29 00:10, , 35F
07/29 00:10, 35F
噓
07/29 00:12, , 36F
07/29 00:12, 36F
→
07/29 00:12, , 37F
07/29 00:12, 37F
推
07/29 00:13, , 38F
07/29 00:13, 38F
還有 105 則推文
→
07/29 06:48, , 144F
07/29 06:48, 144F
推
07/29 06:53, , 145F
07/29 06:53, 145F
噓
07/29 08:35, , 146F
07/29 08:35, 146F
推
07/29 08:56, , 147F
07/29 08:56, 147F
推
07/29 09:34, , 148F
07/29 09:34, 148F
推
07/29 09:46, , 149F
07/29 09:46, 149F
推
07/29 09:58, , 150F
07/29 09:58, 150F
→
07/29 09:58, , 151F
07/29 09:58, 151F
推
07/29 09:59, , 152F
07/29 09:59, 152F
→
07/29 10:00, , 153F
07/29 10:00, 153F
推
07/29 10:09, , 154F
07/29 10:09, 154F
推
07/29 10:16, , 155F
07/29 10:16, 155F
→
07/29 10:16, , 156F
07/29 10:16, 156F
推
07/29 10:44, , 157F
07/29 10:44, 157F
→
07/29 10:44, , 158F
07/29 10:44, 158F
推
07/29 10:50, , 159F
07/29 10:50, 159F
→
07/29 10:51, , 160F
07/29 10:51, 160F
→
07/29 10:51, , 161F
07/29 10:51, 161F
推
07/29 10:53, , 162F
07/29 10:53, 162F
推
07/29 10:54, , 163F
07/29 10:54, 163F
→
07/29 10:55, , 164F
07/29 10:55, 164F
→
07/29 10:55, , 165F
07/29 10:55, 165F
→
07/29 10:57, , 166F
07/29 10:57, 166F
→
07/29 10:57, , 167F
07/29 10:57, 167F
→
07/29 11:03, , 168F
07/29 11:03, 168F
→
07/29 11:03, , 169F
07/29 11:03, 169F
推
07/29 11:31, , 170F
07/29 11:31, 170F
→
07/29 11:31, , 171F
07/29 11:31, 171F
推
07/29 11:46, , 172F
07/29 11:46, 172F
推
07/29 13:08, , 173F
07/29 13:08, 173F
推
07/29 13:37, , 174F
07/29 13:37, 174F
推
07/29 14:21, , 175F
07/29 14:21, 175F
推
07/29 14:26, , 176F
07/29 14:26, 176F
推
07/29 17:38, , 177F
07/29 17:38, 177F
→
07/29 17:38, , 178F
07/29 17:38, 178F
→
07/29 17:38, , 179F
07/29 17:38, 179F
→
07/29 17:43, , 180F
07/29 17:43, 180F
推
07/29 17:56, , 181F
07/29 17:56, 181F
推
07/29 23:11, , 182F
07/29 23:11, 182F
推
07/30 12:16, , 183F
07/30 12:16, 183F