[閒聊] Ben Brode:衝鋒怪很難被平衡
https://redd.it/3j9ngb
爐石設計師Ben Brode在談話性節目裡的發言
大概是針對奴隸戰的
If we had taken a less conservative approach with nerfing cards,
it puts the onus on Blizzard to solve imbalances in the game.
If you as a player believe that no nerf is coming,
then it puts the onus on you to adapt and build a deck that can handle the meta
What that means is that we need to provide tools that are good at dealing with
any kind of deck.
The hardest thing for us to do is provide tools for spells and charge minions
because you need to provide those tools in advance.
個人翻譯
如果我們保守地預估卡片的更動(Nerf)即將到來
那麼這責任就落到BZ身上去解決遊戲中不平衡的情況
如果玩家認為卡片短期內不會更動(Nerf)
那麼這責任就落到玩家身上,玩家在打造一個牌組時必須適度地調整才能跟上Meta
這代表著設計師必須設計"工具"來處理各種牌組
而這裡面對設計師來說最困難的部分就是設計出對抗法術以及衝鋒生物的"工具"
因為設計師必須在那些卡被創造出來之前先設計出counter他們的卡
簡意
法術卡跟衝鋒怪很難被平衡
因為他們很難被counter
大概都是因為他們都是瞬間有效型的卡片
有一點類似自然之力+兇蠻咆哮都是魔法一樣
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.100.76.205
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Hearthstone/M.1441185098.A.7D7.html
推
09/02 17:13, , 1F
09/02 17:13, 1F
改了 3q3q
→
09/02 17:16, , 2F
09/02 17:16, 2F
推
09/02 17:20, , 3F
09/02 17:20, 3F
推
09/02 17:22, , 4F
09/02 17:22, 4F
推
09/02 17:25, , 5F
09/02 17:25, 5F
推
09/02 17:26, , 6F
09/02 17:26, 6F
→
09/02 17:28, , 7F
09/02 17:28, 7F
噓
09/02 17:28, , 8F
09/02 17:28, 8F
推
09/02 17:29, , 9F
09/02 17:29, 9F
→
09/02 17:30, , 10F
09/02 17:30, 10F
推
09/02 17:30, , 11F
09/02 17:30, 11F
→
09/02 17:30, , 12F
09/02 17:30, 12F
※ 編輯: iljapan61 (122.100.76.205), 09/02/2015 17:31:28
→
09/02 17:31, , 13F
09/02 17:31, 13F
推
09/02 17:32, , 14F
09/02 17:32, 14F
→
09/02 17:32, , 15F
09/02 17:32, 15F
→
09/02 17:33, , 16F
09/02 17:33, 16F
推
09/02 17:33, , 17F
09/02 17:33, 17F
→
09/02 17:34, , 18F
09/02 17:34, 18F
→
09/02 17:35, , 19F
09/02 17:35, 19F
→
09/02 17:35, , 20F
09/02 17:35, 20F
→
09/02 17:36, , 21F
09/02 17:36, 21F
→
09/02 17:36, , 22F
09/02 17:36, 22F
→
09/02 17:37, , 23F
09/02 17:37, 23F
→
09/02 17:37, , 24F
09/02 17:37, 24F
→
09/02 17:37, , 25F
09/02 17:37, 25F
推
09/02 17:39, , 26F
09/02 17:39, 26F
→
09/02 17:39, , 27F
09/02 17:39, 27F
推
09/02 17:42, , 28F
09/02 17:42, 28F
推
09/02 17:45, , 29F
09/02 17:45, 29F
推
09/02 17:46, , 30F
09/02 17:46, 30F
推
09/02 17:46, , 31F
09/02 17:46, 31F
推
09/02 17:46, , 32F
09/02 17:46, 32F
→
09/02 17:49, , 33F
09/02 17:49, 33F
→
09/02 17:49, , 34F
09/02 17:49, 34F
→
09/02 17:50, , 35F
09/02 17:50, 35F
推
09/02 17:50, , 36F
09/02 17:50, 36F
→
09/02 17:50, , 37F
09/02 17:50, 37F
還有 40 則推文
→
09/02 19:54, , 78F
09/02 19:54, 78F
→
09/02 19:55, , 79F
09/02 19:55, 79F
推
09/02 20:24, , 80F
09/02 20:24, 80F
推
09/02 20:31, , 81F
09/02 20:31, 81F
推
09/02 20:34, , 82F
09/02 20:34, 82F
推
09/02 20:47, , 83F
09/02 20:47, 83F
→
09/02 20:47, , 84F
09/02 20:47, 84F
推
09/02 20:53, , 85F
09/02 20:53, 85F
→
09/02 21:00, , 86F
09/02 21:00, 86F
推
09/02 21:02, , 87F
09/02 21:02, 87F
→
09/02 21:03, , 88F
09/02 21:03, 88F
→
09/02 21:03, , 89F
09/02 21:03, 89F
→
09/02 21:04, , 90F
09/02 21:04, 90F
推
09/02 21:14, , 91F
09/02 21:14, 91F
→
09/02 21:14, , 92F
09/02 21:14, 92F
推
09/02 21:27, , 93F
09/02 21:27, 93F
推
09/02 21:43, , 94F
09/02 21:43, 94F
→
09/02 21:59, , 95F
09/02 21:59, 95F
→
09/02 21:59, , 96F
09/02 21:59, 96F
推
09/02 22:25, , 97F
09/02 22:25, 97F
推
09/02 22:57, , 98F
09/02 22:57, 98F
→
09/02 23:01, , 99F
09/02 23:01, 99F
→
09/02 23:01, , 100F
09/02 23:01, 100F
推
09/03 01:39, , 101F
09/03 01:39, 101F
推
09/03 01:42, , 102F
09/03 01:42, 102F
推
09/03 02:01, , 103F
09/03 02:01, 103F
推
09/03 02:03, , 104F
09/03 02:03, 104F
→
09/03 02:04, , 105F
09/03 02:04, 105F
→
09/03 02:05, , 106F
09/03 02:05, 106F
→
09/03 02:07, , 107F
09/03 02:07, 107F
→
09/03 02:45, , 108F
09/03 02:45, 108F
→
09/03 02:45, , 109F
09/03 02:45, 109F
→
09/03 02:46, , 110F
09/03 02:46, 110F
→
09/03 02:47, , 111F
09/03 02:47, 111F
推
09/03 04:50, , 112F
09/03 04:50, 112F
推
09/03 07:48, , 113F
09/03 07:48, 113F
→
09/03 07:59, , 114F
09/03 07:59, 114F
→
09/03 09:03, , 115F
09/03 09:03, 115F
→
09/03 09:04, , 116F
09/03 09:04, 116F
, , 117F