[閒聊] 關於哈利波特的戰鬥失衡
哈利波特,
一本終究只能列為童書的奇幻文學。
並非書內劇情不夠精采,
也非世界觀設定不夠詳盡。
其實真正問題出在戰鬥魔法出現嚴重的失衡。
首先我們把哈利波特用來戰鬥的法術作歸類:
【整整‧石化】:鎖身咒
【溫咖癲啦唯啊薩】:漂浮咒
【榫頭‧失準】:鎖腿咒
【去去‧武器走】:繳械咒
【蛇蛇攻】:蛇召喚咒
【疾疾‧護法現身】:防禦召喚咒
【吼吼燒】:噴火咒
【咄咄失】:昏擊咒
【噩噩令】:蠻橫咒
【咒咒虐】:酷刑咒
【啊哇呾喀呾啦】:索命咒(中咒者會立即斃命,完全沒有任何解咒術可以破解)
你發現了嗎?
佛地魔,
一個被喻為魔法史上最邪惡的巫師,
會很多可怕的黑魔法。
但最強的法術【啊哇呾喀呾啦】卻是人人都會。
這是一個相當嚴重的失衡。
任何的戰鬥魔法頓時失去了效益,
因為這索命咒不能防禦、你只能避開,
被打中就是死。
你回頭看看現實中人類的武器,
就連手槍這種東西,
被射中都不一定會死。
所以當【啊哇呾喀呾啦】出現在書裡之後,
哈利波特理的強弱便開始失衡。
你開始不明白佛地魔強大的地方在哪?
一個需要戰鬥的故事裡,
如果出現一個命中就是死的武器,
而且不是只有大魔王會用,
連大魔王中了也都要死。
那這個戰鬥魔法的架構變是完全失衡。
這是我覺得哈利波特裡最大的缺點,
設計了索命咒這個魔法。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.169.214.176
※ 編輯: aa17 來自: 118.169.214.176 (10/03 09:27)
→
10/03 12:49, , 1F
10/03 12:49, 1F
推
10/03 12:49, , 2F
10/03 12:49, 2F
→
10/03 12:49, , 3F
10/03 12:49, 3F
→
10/03 13:16, , 4F
10/03 13:16, 4F
→
10/03 13:20, , 5F
10/03 13:20, 5F
→
10/03 13:20, , 6F
10/03 13:20, 6F
推
10/03 13:24, , 7F
10/03 13:24, 7F
→
10/03 13:26, , 8F
10/03 13:26, 8F
→
10/03 13:27, , 9F
10/03 13:27, 9F
→
10/03 13:28, , 10F
10/03 13:28, 10F
→
10/03 13:28, , 11F
10/03 13:28, 11F
→
10/03 13:29, , 12F
10/03 13:29, 12F
推
10/03 15:31, , 13F
10/03 15:31, 13F
→
10/03 15:32, , 14F
10/03 15:32, 14F
推
10/03 18:14, , 15F
10/03 18:14, 15F
→
10/03 18:19, , 16F
10/03 18:19, 16F
推
10/03 18:31, , 17F
10/03 18:31, 17F
→
10/03 18:32, , 18F
10/03 18:32, 18F
推
10/03 19:51, , 19F
10/03 19:51, 19F
→
10/03 20:03, , 20F
10/03 20:03, 20F
→
10/03 20:04, , 21F
10/03 20:04, 21F
推
10/03 21:08, , 22F
10/03 21:08, 22F
→
10/03 21:08, , 23F
10/03 21:08, 23F
→
10/03 21:09, , 24F
10/03 21:09, 24F
→
10/03 21:10, , 25F
10/03 21:10, 25F
→
10/03 21:11, , 26F
10/03 21:11, 26F
→
10/03 21:12, , 27F
10/03 21:12, 27F
推
10/03 21:25, , 28F
10/03 21:25, 28F
→
10/03 21:38, , 29F
10/03 21:38, 29F
→
10/03 21:39, , 30F
10/03 21:39, 30F
→
10/03 21:41, , 31F
10/03 21:41, 31F
→
10/03 21:41, , 32F
10/03 21:41, 32F
→
10/03 21:43, , 33F
10/03 21:43, 33F
→
10/03 21:44, , 34F
10/03 21:44, 34F
→
10/03 21:45, , 35F
10/03 21:45, 35F
→
10/03 21:46, , 36F
10/03 21:46, 36F
推
10/03 23:09, , 37F
10/03 23:09, 37F
推
10/03 23:57, , 38F
10/03 23:57, 38F
→
10/03 23:57, , 39F
10/03 23:57, 39F
推
10/04 00:15, , 40F
10/04 00:15, 40F
推
10/04 00:18, , 41F
10/04 00:18, 41F
→
10/04 00:19, , 42F
10/04 00:19, 42F
→
10/04 00:21, , 43F
10/04 00:21, 43F
推
10/04 00:24, , 44F
10/04 00:24, 44F
→
10/04 00:24, , 45F
10/04 00:24, 45F
→
10/04 01:23, , 46F
10/04 01:23, 46F
→
10/04 02:06, , 47F
10/04 02:06, 47F
→
10/04 02:06, , 48F
10/04 02:06, 48F
→
10/04 02:12, , 49F
10/04 02:12, 49F
→
10/04 02:12, , 50F
10/04 02:12, 50F
推
10/04 06:43, , 51F
10/04 06:43, 51F
→
10/04 06:44, , 52F
10/04 06:44, 52F
推
10/04 08:11, , 53F
10/04 08:11, 53F
→
10/04 08:12, , 54F
10/04 08:12, 54F
推
10/04 08:31, , 55F
10/04 08:31, 55F
→
10/04 08:31, , 56F
10/04 08:31, 56F
推
10/04 09:57, , 57F
10/04 09:57, 57F
推
10/04 11:18, , 58F
10/04 11:18, 58F
推
10/04 12:54, , 59F
10/04 12:54, 59F
推
10/04 22:11, , 60F
10/04 22:11, 60F
推
10/04 23:42, , 61F
10/04 23:42, 61F
→
10/04 23:43, , 62F
10/04 23:43, 62F
→
10/04 23:44, , 63F
10/04 23:44, 63F
→
10/04 23:45, , 64F
10/04 23:45, 64F
→
10/04 23:48, , 65F
10/04 23:48, 65F
推
10/05 00:15, , 66F
10/05 00:15, 66F
推
10/05 13:07, , 67F
10/05 13:07, 67F
→
10/05 13:07, , 68F
10/05 13:07, 68F
推
10/05 23:13, , 69F
10/05 23:13, 69F
→
10/05 23:14, , 70F
10/05 23:14, 70F
→
10/05 23:15, , 71F
10/05 23:15, 71F
→
10/05 23:15, , 72F
10/05 23:15, 72F
推
10/06 15:56, , 73F
10/06 15:56, 73F
→
10/06 15:56, , 74F
10/06 15:56, 74F
推
10/07 01:49, , 75F
10/07 01:49, 75F
推
10/08 07:54, , 76F
10/08 07:54, 76F
→
10/08 07:55, , 77F
10/08 07:55, 77F
推
10/15 00:38, , 78F
10/15 00:38, 78F
→
10/15 00:39, , 79F
10/15 00:39, 79F
→
10/15 00:40, , 80F
10/15 00:40, 80F
→
10/15 00:40, , 81F
10/15 00:40, 81F
推
10/15 00:43, , 82F
10/15 00:43, 82F
→
10/15 00:43, , 83F
10/15 00:43, 83F