[問卦] 西方語言文法嚴謹,是他們強大的原因嗎?消失
如題
最近開始學習德文
發現這語言真的是有點靠北複雜
除了比英文多一種格
還有什麼陰陽中性詞語
後來小弟去查了一下其他語言
發現歐洲的語言似乎都是差不多這樣
比德文稍簡單而已
那小弟就在想
是不是因為他們語言規則嚴謹複雜
才會早就他們的強大呢?
語言規則嚴謹
邏輯表達也比較清楚嚴謹
對科學發展滿有利的
不像中文組合字
有時候同一組詞每個人隨自己解讀
雖然感性足夠但就比較沒有邏輯
那麼
西方語言文法
是他們強大的原因嗎?
有沒有八卦??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.60.221.122
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1532192850.A.6E9.html
→
07/22 01:08, , 1F
07/22 01:08, 1F
→
07/22 01:08, , 2F
07/22 01:08, 2F
→
07/22 01:10, , 3F
07/22 01:10, 3F
中文文法相對太簡單
→
07/22 01:10, , 4F
07/22 01:10, 4F
噓
07/22 01:11, , 5F
07/22 01:11, 5F
說文法你提到字是有什麼毛病
→
07/22 01:12, , 6F
07/22 01:12, 6F
推
07/22 01:12, , 7F
07/22 01:12, 7F
→
07/22 01:13, , 8F
07/22 01:13, 8F
推
07/22 01:14, , 9F
07/22 01:14, 9F
推
07/22 01:14, , 10F
07/22 01:14, 10F
推
07/22 01:15, , 11F
07/22 01:15, 11F
推
07/22 01:15, , 12F
07/22 01:15, 12F
推
07/22 01:15, , 13F
07/22 01:15, 13F
→
07/22 01:16, , 14F
07/22 01:16, 14F
都2018年了還是只能提千年前的宋嗎?
推
07/22 01:16, , 15F
07/22 01:16, 15F
※ 編輯: ray90910 (61.60.221.122), 07/22/2018 01:19:00
推
07/22 01:18, , 16F
07/22 01:18, 16F
推
07/22 01:19, , 17F
07/22 01:19, 17F
噓
07/22 01:23, , 18F
07/22 01:23, 18F
你是不是不知道二戰美國接受一堆德國精英科學家的故事?
推
07/22 01:24, , 19F
07/22 01:24, 19F
推
07/22 01:24, , 20F
07/22 01:24, 20F
英文也算是有點嚴謹了
噓
07/22 01:24, , 21F
07/22 01:24, 21F
→
07/22 01:26, , 22F
07/22 01:26, 22F
※ 編輯: ray90910 (61.60.221.122), 07/22/2018 01:29:11
推
07/22 01:28, , 23F
07/22 01:28, 23F
→
07/22 01:28, , 24F
07/22 01:28, 24F
→
07/22 01:29, , 25F
07/22 01:29, 25F
→
07/22 01:29, , 26F
07/22 01:29, 26F
推
07/22 01:29, , 27F
07/22 01:29, 27F
→
07/22 01:30, , 28F
07/22 01:30, 28F
我從來沒有說中文沒文法感謝
噓
07/22 01:30, , 29F
07/22 01:30, 29F
為啥不行?我又不是用肯定句?有什麼毛病阿
→
07/22 01:30, , 30F
07/22 01:30, 30F
還有 37 則推文
還有 6 段內文
→
07/22 01:48, , 68F
07/22 01:48, 68F
→
07/22 01:49, , 69F
07/22 01:49, 69F
推
07/22 01:50, , 70F
07/22 01:50, 70F
→
07/22 01:50, , 71F
07/22 01:50, 71F
推
07/22 01:51, , 72F
07/22 01:51, 72F
→
07/22 01:51, , 73F
07/22 01:51, 73F
→
07/22 01:51, , 74F
07/22 01:51, 74F
→
07/22 01:51, , 75F
07/22 01:51, 75F
→
07/22 01:51, , 76F
07/22 01:51, 76F
→
07/22 01:51, , 77F
07/22 01:51, 77F
→
07/22 01:51, , 78F
07/22 01:51, 78F
→
07/22 01:51, , 79F
07/22 01:51, 79F
→
07/22 01:52, , 80F
07/22 01:52, 80F
→
07/22 01:52, , 81F
07/22 01:52, 81F
→
07/22 01:52, , 82F
07/22 01:52, 82F
→
07/22 01:52, , 83F
07/22 01:52, 83F
→
07/22 01:53, , 84F
07/22 01:53, 84F
→
07/22 01:53, , 85F
07/22 01:53, 85F
→
07/22 01:53, , 86F
07/22 01:53, 86F
推
07/22 01:54, , 87F
07/22 01:54, 87F
噓
07/22 01:58, , 88F
07/22 01:58, 88F
推
07/22 02:02, , 89F
07/22 02:02, 89F
→
07/22 02:02, , 90F
07/22 02:02, 90F
推
07/22 02:04, , 91F
07/22 02:04, 91F
→
07/22 02:04, , 92F
07/22 02:04, 92F
噓
07/22 02:04, , 93F
07/22 02:04, 93F
→
07/22 02:04, , 94F
07/22 02:04, 94F
→
07/22 02:13, , 95F
07/22 02:13, 95F
→
07/22 02:13, , 96F
07/22 02:13, 96F
噓
07/22 02:13, , 97F
07/22 02:13, 97F
噓
07/22 02:15, , 98F
07/22 02:15, 98F
→
07/22 02:15, , 99F
07/22 02:15, 99F
→
07/22 02:16, , 100F
07/22 02:16, 100F
→
07/22 02:16, , 101F
07/22 02:16, 101F
→
07/22 02:16, , 102F
07/22 02:16, 102F
推
07/22 02:19, , 103F
07/22 02:19, 103F
→
07/22 02:19, , 104F
07/22 02:19, 104F
推
07/22 02:46, , 105F
07/22 02:46, 105F
推
07/22 02:50, , 106F
07/22 02:50, 106F
推
07/22 02:50, , 107F
07/22 02:50, 107F