Fw: [情報] 石油公司高層假扮Elon Musk騙取機密消失
※ [本文轉錄自 car 看板 #1NseCKYD ]
作者: Scape (non) 看板: car
標題: [情報] 石油公司高層假扮Elon Musk騙取機密
時間: Thu Sep 15 19:16:33 2016
Tesla提告了石油公司Quest Integrity Group的CFO(首席財務官), Todd Katz
涉嫌假冒Elon Musk去騙取公司機密。
這位CFO用的手法是利用了相似的電子郵件 âelontesla@yahoo.comâ寫äºä¸å°ä¿¡
去向Tesla的CFO索取沒有被公開的財務機密訊息(Yahoo表示:...)
這封信件的內容如下:
why you so cautious w Q3/4 gm guidance on call? also what are your thoughts
on disclosing M3 res#? Pros/cons from ir pov? what is your best guess as to
where we actually come in on q3/4 deliverables. honest guess? no bs. thx 4
hard work prepping 4 today
em
個人覺得這實在很扯也很笨,原文內是說Tesla在周三(台灣時間周四)已經提告
看來電動車對於石油市場影響真的很大
有點害怕Musk有天被消失了...
目前還沒看到有比較大的媒體在報導這件事情
是由Forbes首先報導的(就是那個富比士,要看報導請用沒裝Adblock的瀏覽器看)
報導連結:https://goo.gl/qBha6M
訴訟文件連結:https://goo.gl/yJVyS4
==============================================================================
原文連結:https://goo.gl/w8hrA2
Elon Musk has warned people to stay vigilant and “revolt against the
propaganda of the fossil fuel industry which is unrelenting and enormous”.
Now Tesla is having its own fight against the oil industry and it’s not one
to promote electric vehicles. The company is suing an oil pipeline services
firm and its Chief Financial Officer who Tesla says tried to impersonate Musk
to gain confidential information about Tesla’s deliveries during the current
quarter.
Ironically, the company is called ‘Quest Integrity‘. On its website, it
lists clients like BP, Chevron and ExxonMobil, among others. The executive in
question accused of having impersonated Musk is Todd Katz, who is listed as
Chief Finacial Officer on the company’s website.
In his bio, he claims to have worked at “several leading Wall Street
investment banks, including Morgan Stanley, and most recently, as a Director
at Merrill Lynch.”
In the suit filed today in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County against
Todd Katz, the Quest Integrity Group, and 10 John Does, Tesla and Hueston
Hennigan LLP, the firm representing the automaker, claim that Katz registered
the email address âelontesla@yahoo.comâ and sent the following email to
Jason Wheeler, Tesla’s CFO, on August 3:
“why you so cautious w Q3/4 gm guidance on call? also what are your thoughts
on disclosing M3 res#? Pros/cons from ir pov? what is your best guess as to
where we actually come in on q3/4 deliverables. honest guess? no bs. thx 4
hard work prepping 4 today
em”
Wheeler did not disclose any information and instead, Tesla launched its own
investigation to find out who is behind the email. In the suit, which Forbes
obtained first and you can read in full below, Tesla didn’t divulge how they
managed to connect the email to Katz, Quest Integrity, and the 10 “Doe
Defendants”, but they claim that “on information and belief”, they can say
that Katz created the âelontesla@yahoo.comâ account and that 10 other
individuals were involved.
Furthermore, Tesla says that Katz “intended to use that information in
furtherance of his employer’s and its clients’ business and financial
interest.” Someone with Tesla’s delivery numbers ahead of the disclosure at
the end of a quarter would have an important advantage on the public market
since Tesla deliveries can easily by converted to revenue. It’s indeed
valuable information.
A few weeks after the incident, Musk sent an email to employees and asked to
push to deliver as many vehicles as possible by the end of the quarter. He
added that Tesla was on the “razor edge” of turning a profit and that he
would like to ‘throw a pie in the face of all naysayers on Wall Street’.
Tesla seeks to be reimbursed for the cost of its investigation into “Katz’s
criminal misconduct”.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.34.252.81
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1473938196.A.88D.html
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: Scape (1.34.252.81), 09/15/2016 19:21:44
推
09/15 19:27, , 1F
09/15 19:27, 1F
大家都去烤肉了XD
推
09/15 19:28, , 2F
09/15 19:28, 2F
Tesla沒有摔吧
他們是接到的這封email後就自己展開了調查,查出是誰發的之後才提告
※ 編輯: Scape (1.34.252.81), 09/15/2016 19:30:06
推
09/15 19:31, , 3F
09/15 19:31, 3F
推
09/15 19:32, , 4F
09/15 19:32, 4F
推
09/15 19:32, , 5F
09/15 19:32, 5F
推
09/15 20:28, , 6F
09/15 20:28, 6F
→
09/15 20:35, , 7F
09/15 20:35, 7F