最近看到採訪空姐的訪談
空姐:我是xxx 龍x科大的……
看來空姐要求沒很多啊~
有臉勝過腦袋空空的意思?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.32.151.23
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1471882027.A.649.html
推
08/23 00:07, , 1F
08/23 00:07, 1F
推
08/23 00:07, , 2F
08/23 00:07, 2F
同樣ㄏ開頭
推
08/23 00:07, , 3F
08/23 00:07, 3F
推
08/23 00:07, , 4F
08/23 00:07, 4F
推
08/23 00:07, , 5F
08/23 00:07, 5F
→
08/23 00:07, , 6F
08/23 00:07, 6F
→
08/23 00:07, , 7F
08/23 00:07, 7F
→
08/23 00:09, , 8F
08/23 00:09, 8F
推
08/23 00:09, , 9F
08/23 00:09, 9F
高級服務生 看門面的 應該也要有一定水平吧!
(雖然好像只有帶位送餐這些事?
推
08/23 00:09, , 10F
08/23 00:09, 10F
推
08/23 00:10, , 11F
08/23 00:10, 11F
推
08/23 00:11, , 12F
08/23 00:11, 12F
→
08/23 00:11, , 13F
08/23 00:11, 13F
推
08/23 00:11, , 14F
08/23 00:11, 14F
會讀書應該就不會跑去龍x了…
應該只需要一張學歷吧!
推
08/23 00:11, , 15F
08/23 00:11, 15F
哪裡強不知道0.0
推
08/23 00:12, , 16F
08/23 00:12, 16F
→
08/23 00:12, , 17F
08/23 00:12, 17F
這很多人都敢吧!@@
推
08/23 00:12, , 18F
08/23 00:12, 18F
推
08/23 00:12, , 19F
08/23 00:12, 19F
推
08/23 00:12, , 20F
08/23 00:12, 20F
→
08/23 00:12, , 21F
08/23 00:12, 21F
推
08/23 00:13, , 22F
08/23 00:13, 22F
→
08/23 00:13, , 23F
08/23 00:13, 23F
推
08/23 00:13, , 24F
08/23 00:13, 24F
噓
08/23 00:13, , 25F
08/23 00:13, 25F
有貶低嗎?只是跟我以為的不成正比而已
想說空姐大多都有一定的知識水平 但實際上與認知有差異
噓
08/23 00:13, , 26F
08/23 00:13, 26F
→
08/23 00:15, , 27F
08/23 00:15, 27F
噓
08/23 00:16, , 28F
08/23 00:16, 28F
噓
08/23 00:17, , 29F
08/23 00:17, 29F
噓
08/23 00:17, , 30F
08/23 00:17, 30F
推
08/23 00:17, , 31F
08/23 00:17, 31F
→
08/23 00:18, , 32F
08/23 00:18, 32F
推
08/23 00:18, , 33F
08/23 00:18, 33F
噓
08/23 00:19, , 34F
08/23 00:19, 34F
學店啊~不過不是了啦!轉走了
推
08/23 00:19, , 35F
08/23 00:19, 35F
→
08/23 00:19, , 36F
08/23 00:19, 36F
可能有機會練習吧!
噓
08/23 00:22, , 37F
08/23 00:22, 37F
噓
08/23 00:22, , 38F
08/23 00:22, 38F
推
08/23 00:23, , 39F
08/23 00:23, 39F
推
08/23 00:23, , 40F
08/23 00:23, 40F
→
08/23 00:23, , 41F
08/23 00:23, 41F
噓
08/23 00:26, , 42F
08/23 00:26, 42F
這比較符合我對於空姐的知識水平認知
不然就是私立前段
(科系好像影響不大
噓
08/23 00:28, , 43F
08/23 00:28, 43F
哪裡強?0.0
→
08/23 00:28, , 44F
08/23 00:28, 44F
應該都會畢業吧!
噓
08/23 00:29, , 45F
08/23 00:29, 45F
→
08/23 00:29, , 46F
08/23 00:29, 46F
不用鑑定…已經看到了Orz
推
08/23 00:31, , 47F
08/23 00:31, 47F
噓
08/23 00:33, , 48F
08/23 00:33, 48F
→
08/23 00:33, , 49F
08/23 00:33, 49F
噓
08/23 00:33, , 50F
08/23 00:33, 50F
→
08/23 00:33, , 51F
08/23 00:33, 51F
→
08/23 00:33, , 52F
08/23 00:33, 52F
人數不夠→時數過長 解決方式應該是增加人數
不過這又牽涉到錢的問題囉!
噓
08/23 00:34, , 53F
08/23 00:34, 53F
好像跟傳統技術人員差不多薪水 不過感覺付出不成正相當
→
08/23 00:34, , 54F
08/23 00:34, 54F
噓
08/23 00:36, , 55F
08/23 00:36, 55F
→
08/23 00:36, , 56F
08/23 00:36, 56F
我昨天才跟我媽討論到相關內容
因為他們以前太苦 沒什麼機會讀書 所以在他們有能力時不管是不是讀書的料都要栽培
接著就是廣設大學了
撇除空姐行業 很多工作出來2xk 私立若學貸4年應該也要50萬吧! 總會想說這到底該還
到何時
學歷太普遍也不是好事 新聞也挺多的
※ 編輯: success3 (218.32.151.23), 08/23/2016 00:43:37
→
08/23 00:41, , 57F
08/23 00:41, 57F
→
08/23 00:48, , 58F
08/23 00:48, 58F
噓
08/23 00:49, , 59F
08/23 00:49, 59F
→
08/23 00:49, , 60F
08/23 00:49, 60F
→
08/23 00:50, , 61F
08/23 00:50, 61F
噓
08/23 01:03, , 62F
08/23 01:03, 62F
→
08/23 01:04, , 63F
08/23 01:04, 63F
→
08/23 01:05, , 64F
08/23 01:05, 64F
→
08/23 01:14, , 65F
08/23 01:14, 65F
→
08/23 01:27, , 66F
08/23 01:27, 66F

→
08/23 01:37, , 67F
08/23 01:37, 67F