[新聞] 澳7-11違法低薪剝削員工可能賠償1億澳幣消失

看板Gossiping作者時間9年前 (2016/04/12 17:07), 9年前編輯推噓53(58517)
留言80則, 75人參與, 最新討論串1/1
1.媒體來源: http://www.smh.com.au/business 雪梨先驅晨報 新聞標題 7-Eleven: Wage compensation bill may top $100 million 內文: Convenience store giant 7-Eleven could have to repay up to $100 million in compensation to more than 2000 past and present employees, with the scandal looming as the biggest case of wage fraud in Australian corporate history. Underpayment of staff at 7-Eleven franchises is under Senate scrutiny. Underpayment of staff at 7-Eleven franchises is under Senate scrutiny. Photo: Darrian Traynor A compensation panel headed by former competition tsar Allan Fels is ramping up its processing of claims, and has called for the government to consider establishing a permanent wage fairness panel to adjudicate back pay claims in instances where evidence of systemic worker exploitation is reported at a particular business. Advertisement Professor Fels told Fairfax Media there were 2000 claims from current and former workers at 7-Eleven that were being processed, with new claims still coming in. So far the panel has paid 300 workers a total of $10 million in back pay, which he says is equivalent to an average payout of $38,000. He wouldn't be drawn on how much the final payout would be. But based on the current payout rate, it could be anywhere between $60 million and $100 million. If the tally tops $100 million it would place 7-Eleven's back pay claim as the highest in Australia's history, eclipsing the payout of Ansett workers following the airline's collapse. 'Unfounded guesswork' A spokesman for 7-Eleven said: "Speculating on the quantum of claims is unhelpful, is nothing more than unfounded guess work and adds nothing to the process of remediation. 7-Eleven stands by its commitment that approved claims will be paid." Professor Fels' comments come as a report into 7-Eleven by the Fair Work Ombudsman shows the regulator does not have enough powers to properly crack down on wage abuse in Australia. "We do not have power to compel any employer or other witness to participate in an interview," the report, obtained exclusively by BusinessDay, says. Unlike other regulators that operate in civil jurisdictions like the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, FWO does not have the power to compel employers or witnesses to provide evidence. The report recommended 7-Eleven enter into a compliance partnership with Fair Work to ensure wage fraud is stamped out. The report also recommended 7-Eleven set up a guarantee fund to repay exploited workers, introduce biometric systems to track worker hours and engage an external party to conduct annual audits. 7-Eleven must also publicly accept its moral and ethical responsibility to staff, the report says. Ombudsman's warning Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James has also flagged taking on the head offices of more large companies in an opinion piece published in BusinessDay. "The law can extend legal liability to individuals involved in the procurement and to companies further up the supply chain," Ms James warns. Professor Fels said while tougher laws and penalties would be useful, the problem of underpayment of wages is widespread in Australia and something much deeper needed to be done. He said there was something to be learned from the 7-Eleven compensation model, which should be considered to be put in law with far less rigorous standards of proof than is required for the courts. "I think one of the elements of a solution would be to impose a degree of liability on the franchisor with payments, without totally discharging the franchisee's obligations," Prof Fels said. "Asking franchisors to make up payment provides a more powerful incentive than fines or even modest court-arranged payments," he said. "The difference with the Fair Work and the panel is to get repayments you need to go to court which requires high standards of evidence, the 7-Eleven model is one where reasonably justified claims are paid, and the size of outcomes that would dwarf what would be possible in court of law." 7-Eleven has previously said it would cover the first $25 million in back pay claims and then expect franchisees to chip in 50¢ in the dollar for every claim over that amount. Yet both the government and Labor appear to have little appetite for increasing the powers of the Fair Work Ombudsman. The Minister for Employment, Michaelia Cash, did not answer questions regarding increasing the powers of Fair Work while shadow employment minister Brendan O'Connor said Labor would consider it but only after consultation with employers. 新聞大意是: 過去幾年澳洲7-Eleven聘用大量國際學生當店員而且薪資遠低於澳洲法定薪資 被澳洲當地的Fair Work Ombudsman(類似台灣勞工局)調查與裁罰 目前澳洲7-Eleven已經賠償300名員工總共1000萬澳幣的薪資補償金(每人約3萬8澳幣) 而現在還有超過2000名7-11的前員工跟現任員工正在申請賠償 預估之後此案總共會讓澳洲7-Eleven賠償金額落在6000萬至1億元澳幣之間 新聞連結: http://goo.gl/tqxBW6 5.備註: 看了實在很感慨 不知道哪時候我們的政府才有這種魄力敢對違法壓榨人力的企業開刀 -- wallace0960:5樓被4樓摸到受不了 06/18 00:12 rickwei0816:快出來吧5樓 06/18 00:14 推 NeoChou:三樓房東裝針孔 06/18 00:14 niccccccccce:快幹死四樓 06/18 00:14 bluebone1206:他媽的我就幹死你 06/18 00:14 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.227.179.157 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1460452072.A.962.html

04/12 17:08, , 1F
反觀本國
04/12 17:08, 1F

04/12 17:08, , 2F
哈哈哈哈哈哈UCCU
04/12 17:08, 2F

04/12 17:08, , 3F
反觀
04/12 17:08, 3F

04/12 17:08, , 4F
台灣之光
04/12 17:08, 4F
澳洲7-Eleven跟台灣統一的是不同公司唷

04/12 17:08, , 5F
死好
04/12 17:08, 5F
※ 編輯: gn00324893 (125.227.179.157), 04/12/2016 17:09:46

04/12 17:10, , 6F
鬼島:有競爭力的企業,政府幫你進行產學合作
04/12 17:10, 6F

04/12 17:10, , 7F
統一:我們也是受害者
04/12 17:10, 7F

04/12 17:10, , 8F
該不會有人以為那是台灣開過去的?
04/12 17:10, 8F

04/12 17:10, , 9F
桶二不意外...(咦
04/12 17:10, 9F

04/12 17:10, , 10F
樓下一起幫台灣員工QQ
04/12 17:10, 10F

04/12 17:11, , 11F
反觀桶二
04/12 17:11, 11F

04/12 17:11, , 12F
反觀台灣
04/12 17:11, 12F

04/12 17:12, , 13F
反觀
04/12 17:12, 13F

04/12 17:13, , 14F
鬼島的話應該是重罰一萬
04/12 17:13, 14F

04/12 17:13, , 15F
真的只能反觀了
04/12 17:13, 15F

04/12 17:13, , 16F
台灣重罰1萬
04/12 17:13, 16F

04/12 17:14, , 17F
鬼島:可惡,重罰一億,罰勞工
04/12 17:14, 17F

04/12 17:14, , 18F
化工廠:薪水還是比你家高 反觀
04/12 17:14, 18F

04/12 17:14, , 19F
違反勞基法大約罰20萬~100萬
04/12 17:14, 19F

04/12 17:15, , 20F
如果在台灣應該是這樣:查無不法,謝謝指教。
04/12 17:15, 20F
還有 40 則推文
還有 39 段內文
04/12 19:28, , 61F
鬼島有鬼島的玩法 不爽做我就叫政府開放外勞
04/12 19:28, 61F

04/12 19:28, , 62F
台灣重罰1000 元
04/12 19:28, 62F

04/12 19:28, , 63F
台灣資委會: 給22K不錯了 不要連機會也沒有
04/12 19:28, 63F

04/12 19:32, , 64F
統一旗下淨利好高但絕對沒有反應在薪資上 員工慘
04/12 19:32, 64F

04/12 20:16, , 65F
台灣可以學學嗎,罰無良企業就是要這麼重
04/12 20:16, 65F

04/12 20:50, , 66F
鬼島便利商店有合法的嗎?
04/12 20:50, 66F

04/12 20:53, , 67F
反觀
04/12 20:53, 67F

04/12 21:31, , 68F
台灣 重罰 2萬
04/12 21:31, 68F

04/12 21:33, , 69F
跟台灣勞工局一點都不像好嗎
04/12 21:33, 69F

04/12 22:10, , 70F
落實勞基法!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!懲罰性罰金修法!!!!!!!!!!!!
04/12 22:10, 70F

04/12 22:33, , 71F
反觀鬼島 重罰2萬 幹0糧
04/12 22:33, 71F

04/12 22:34, , 72F
反觀...
04/12 22:34, 72F

04/12 23:00, , 73F
台灣有台灣的玩法,真的要罰動搖國本囉↓!
04/12 23:00, 73F

04/12 23:37, , 74F
意圖使人反觀文
04/12 23:37, 74F

04/13 03:34, , 75F
台灣連外國來的詐騙集團都不敢罰了
04/13 03:34, 75F

04/13 09:26, , 76F
台灣有勞工局? 不是資方局嗎?
04/13 09:26, 76F

04/13 09:49, , 77F
反觀台灣...勞動法規的罰則不痛不癢,認定上也偏資方
04/13 09:49, 77F

04/13 11:46, , 78F
勞動部可以廢了,花血汗錢教訓勞方的單位。
04/13 11:46, 78F

04/13 13:44, , 79F
果然釣到酸統一的w
04/13 13:44, 79F

04/13 13:53, , 80F
反觀
04/13 13:53, 80F
CrestiaBell:轉錄至看板 IA 04/15 22:31
文章代碼(AID): #1N3BhebY (Gossiping)