[問題] 一題閱測

看板GRE作者 (...)時間13年前 (2012/07/10 20:46), 編輯推噓2(2012)
留言14則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
來自新GRE閱讀理解36套 練習29第1題 題目如下,正確答案是C,因為對應到文章最後寫最後as most of these experiments support traditional quantum mechanics, Einstein's approach is almost certainly erroneous. 不過我不太懂 do not disconfirm 是"沒有未證實"的意思嗎 那這麼說選項C意識是說愛因斯坦理論的實驗沒有否定量子力學的 the hidden-parameter theory(這個也是愛因斯坦提的吧), 那這麼說實驗沒有否定愛因斯坦的說法,又怎麼能符合題目問的, "解釋了愛因斯坦的 approach 是錯的呢" Quantum mechanics is a highly successful theory: it supplies methods for accurately calculating the results of diverse experiments, especially with minute particles. The predictions of quantum mechanics, however, give only the probability of an event, not a deterministic statement of whether or not the event will occur. Because of this probabilism, Einstein remained strongly dissatisfied with the theory throughout his life, though he did not maintain that quantum mechanics is wrong. Rather, he held that it is incomplete: in quantum mechanics the motion of a particle must be described in terms of probabilities, he argued, only because some parameters that determine the motion have not been specified. Einstein's ideas have been tested by experiments performed since his death, and as most of these experiments support traditional quantum mechanics, Einstein's approach is almost certainly erroneous. (134 words) 10. It can be inferred from the passage that the author's conclusion that Einstein's approach is "erroneous" might have to be modified because (A) it is theoretically possible to generate plausible theories with hidden parameters within them (B) some experimental tests of Einstein's theory do not disconfirm the hidden-parameter theory of quantum mechanics (C) it is possible for a theory to have hidden parameters and yet be probabilistic (D) traditional quantum mechanics has not yet been used to analyze all of the phenomena to which it could be applied (E) there are too many possible hidden parameters to develop meaningful tests of hidden-parameter theories -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.155.119

07/10 22:23, , 1F
(B)指沒有直接證據否定愛因斯坦的猜測,所以真假待決
07/10 22:23, 1F

07/10 22:26, , 2F
(C)指理論已可說明不確定性,不用預設有未知的參數
07/10 22:26, 2F

07/10 22:30, , 3F
C比B更能說愛因斯坦猜想有未知參數的看法幾乎一定錯
07/10 22:30, 3F

07/10 22:39, , 4F
我怎麼總覺得是B才對 答案給錯?
07/10 22:39, 4F

07/10 23:56, , 5F
抱歉寫錯,是B
07/10 23:56, 5F

07/11 01:25, , 6F
結論要修正的話是因為B。如果C成立的話,結論沒問題
07/11 01:25, 6F

07/11 01:27, , 7F
抱歉沒細看題目問什麼,只看選項的強度
07/11 01:27, 7F

07/11 14:50, , 8F
因為"多數(most)"愛因斯坦所設計的實驗,證實了傳統
07/11 14:50, 8F

07/11 14:50, , 9F
量子理論的正確性。這句話代表,有些確實支持了
07/11 14:50, 9F

07/11 14:51, , 10F
愛因斯坦的想法。可見,作者宣稱 愛因斯坦的想法
07/11 14:51, 10F

07/11 14:51, , 11F
"certainly" errorneous 太武斷了
07/11 14:51, 11F

07/11 14:51, , 12F
答案B
07/11 14:51, 12F

07/11 14:52, , 13F
補充一下: 上面所提愛因斯坦的"想法",指的是
07/11 14:52, 13F

07/11 14:53, , 14F
量子之所以無法完整描述現象,是因為缺少了關鍵參數
07/11 14:53, 14F
文章代碼(AID): #1F_2Gjhq (GRE)