[問題] argument 問題

看板GRE作者methodical (井然有序的)時間13年前 (2011/04/30 22:55)推噓5(5推 0噓 13→)

留言18則, 5人參與討論串1/1

高頻第 132 題 The following appeared in a medical newsletter. “Doctors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of patients. The first group of patients, all being treated for muscle injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time was, on average, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients in the second group, all being treated by Dr. Alton, a general physician, were given sugar pills, although the patients believed they were taking antibiotics. Their average recuperation time was not significantly reduced. Therefore, all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment.” ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 問題一: 我發現有些題目一開始說了一些觀點以後接下來就根本不會再提到了像這題一開始有提到 secondary infections 的問題到結論就完全沒再提了那我可以寫下面這樣的觀點嗎 ? "本文並沒有明顯的證據支持 antibiotics 能有效地降低 secondary infections" 感覺這樣寫似乎帶有主觀的認定因為文章也沒有這樣說問題二: 有些漏洞真的展不開像是這題的其中一個漏洞 "並沒有任何證據表明 secondary infections 一定會發生在肌肉拉傷的病人上" 寫完這句我就不知道要寫甚麼了如果遇到這種漏洞板上的人通常怎麼寫呢? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.195.200.38 ※ 編輯: methodical 來自: 123.195.200.38 (04/30 23:03)

推

mattkuo

04/30 23:37, , 1^F

04/30 23:37, 1^F

→

mattkuo

04/30 23:38, , 2^F

04/30 23:38, 2^F

→

mattkuo

04/30 23:39, , 3^F

04/30 23:39, 3^F