[類反] 請教幾題類反

看板GRE作者 (Berry)時間13年前 (2010/10/14 01:25), 編輯推噓4(4推 0噓 14→)
留言18則, 6人參與, 5年前最新討論串1/1
1. disabuse: error 為什麼要選rehabilitate:addiction 而不是discredit:reputation 2. CAT裡面有canonical <> qualified/non-traditional Non-traditional 我可以理解，但為什麼canonical 會和qualified構成反義? 3.Categorical <>qualified/conditional 不知道這個要如何解釋才好? 4. Generation:Individual 答案是shift:laborer 為什麼不可以選 Tree:limb 或 river : stream? 謝謝版友的指教 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.217.82
推
10/14 01:58, , 1F
第1個是 左邊解除右邊, 而且右邊都是不好的
10/14 01:58, 1F
推
10/14 03:06, , 2F
4. Shift在Webster的第4-a定義是 a group of people
10/14 03:06, 2F
→
10/14 03:06, , 3F
who work or occupy themselves in turn with other
10/14 03:06, 3F
→
10/14 03:09, , 4F
groups. 強調的是group的觀念。limb and stream應該
10/14 03:09, 4F
→
10/14 03:11, , 5F
應該是branch的概念吧~反過來group不見得成立~
10/14 03:11, 5F
→
10/14 03:18, , 6F
3. Categorical : ABSOLUTE, UNQUALIFIED - Webster
10/14 03:18, 6F
→
10/14 03:19, , 7F
既然如此，當然不允許conditional這種模糊的字眼存在
10/14 03:19, 7F
→
10/14 03:24, , 8F
至於2. canonical是orthodox，也就是conforming to a
10/14 03:24, 8F
→
10/14 03:25, , 9F
general rule的，而general是not confined by
10/14 03:25, 9F
→
10/14 03:26, , 10F
specialization or careful limitation..so....#
10/14 03:26, 10F
→
10/14 03:27, , 11F
是不是乾脆回文比較清楚 ^^"
10/14 03:27, 11F
推
10/14 12:50, , 12F
我不太懂3的解釋耶... 絕對的:資格的@@?有什麼關係呢
10/14 12:50, 12F
→
10/14 13:28, , 13F
兩個都是categorical的第一定義。這麼說好了~「絕對
10/14 13:28, 13F
→
10/14 13:30, , 14F
」這樣的字眼是不會跟你「談條件」的~~
10/14 13:30, 14F
→
10/14 13:31, , 15F
所以no restriction, no qualification~
10/14 13:31, 15F
推
10/14 14:21, , 16F
absolute=uncondition沒有條件的
10/14 14:21, 16F
→
12/02 19:20, , 17F
」這樣的字眼是不會跟你 https://noxiv.com
12/02 19:20, 17F
→
04/13 23:50, 5年前 , 18F
至於2. canoni https://moxox.com
04/13 23:50, 18F
‣ 更多 momoberry 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1CjUkWOb (GRE)