[回報] 10月27日大阪機考

看板GRE作者Maia ( gone)時間16年前 (2009/10/28 21:29)推噓2(2推 0噓 6→)

留言8則, 4人參與討論串1/1

一直以來受本版恩惠良多機考經驗者都說前三題非常重要可是我前三題都是反意類比但沒有任何印象中的10月機經 (我沒讀韓網兩年機經，聽說很有效）第四題開始就出現填充題順序：I-A-V-Q-I(有註明為加考) Issue No.210 (高頻次數5) “Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress.” No.141 (高頻次數1) “People make the mistake of treating experts with suspicion and mistrust, no matter how valuable their contributions might be.” Argument No. 232 (高頻題次數0) The following is a letter to the editor of the Atticus City newspaper. “Former Mayor Durant owes an apology to the city of Atticus. Both the damage to the River Bridge, which connects Atticus to Hartley, and the traffic problems we have long experienced on the bridge were actually caused 20 years ago by Durant. After all, he is the one who approved the construction of the bridge. If he had approved a wider and better-designed bridge, on which approximately the same amount of public money would have been spent, none of the damage or problems would have occurred. Instead, the River Bridge has deteriorated far more rapidly over the past 20 years than has the much longer Derby Bridge up the river. Even though the winters have been severe in the past several years, this is no excuse for the negligence and wastefulness of Durant.” 第一大題就出現Issue很不好！頭腦還很混沌，不過我有試圖多用gre單字 verbal誠如本週以來大家回報的幾乎都沒有機經題所以很抱歉我都不記得 >.< 可是我記得填空跟閱讀填空有一題類似： *目前針對xxx的研究雖有_____但已...._________ 選類似"不足;具有價值" *有兩個針對xxx的研究相互____反而遮掩了他們的________ 選類似"牴觸;共通點" 短篇閱讀 1. 介紹Women literature of the West 主要在講由於"西部"這詞在普遍認定中跟實際的地理範圍、人種組成根本有差距所以現有的西部文學根本不足以代表其中的多樣性第一題問一個看起來是華人名字的作家，作品如何我選尚未受到研究者的注目總之這一篇一直舉一大堆西部文學的經典，可是根本題目中都沒有問到所以不要浪費時間讀那些人名跟書名 2. 第一題就問所謂的republic定義是什麼我選其實是結合三種政治制度(democracy,monarchy, aristocracy) 有一題問本文的主旨或功能之類的我選將一個（政治？）詞彙(term)放在特定國家的政治與歷史脈絡(context)來了解有一個選項是說徹底地解釋republic的epistemology(我沒選這個) 還有一題的選項好像是選democracy其實只能在雅典這樣的城邦國家中實行這一題我記得很清楚，他把republic放在英國跟美國的政治歷史中來解釋有說democracy的理想是xx若極端則為oo aristocracy monarchy 而republic就是一種結合折衷的手法 3. 有兩種生物聚落，一種叫continuous聚落只能養活(harbor)單一的物種，一種可以harbor更多物種。支持continuous聚落的說因為那些單一物種的 vulnerability to disruption所以需要保護那反對派的就是覺得這樣太uniform(請注意題目說critics of continuous 聚落) 我想了一下，critics應該是指批評反對那種聚落的，因為選項裡一個是vulnerability to disruption一個就是強調uniform(太單一不好) 數學我全部不記得了我可以坦承我數學考680..........但那真得是我的實力............... 類比反義雖然沒有機經題，但請大家不要放棄一定要去推敲可能的關係，因為我猜得很辛苦總之最後verbal有上600 所以我想我的閱讀測驗的理解應該是正確的吧希望可以幫助到這幾天要考的版友們一起打敗萬惡的ETS美帝吧 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.127.107.250 ※ 編輯: Maia 來自: 219.127.107.250 (10/28 21:31)

→

Maia

10/28 21:34, , 1^F

10/28 21:34, 1^F

→

Maia

10/28 21:35, , 2^F

10/28 21:35, 2^F

→

Maia

10/28 21:36, , 3^F

10/28 21:36, 3^F