[類比] ATTACK:VANQUISHED=
ATTACK:VANQUISHED=
A) WOO:ADORED
B) SMOTHER:CHOKED
C) SPY:INVESTIGATED
D) GOAD:PROVOKED
E) GUESS:CALCULATED
答案是D) GOAD:PROVOKED
其實我能接受這答案
可是他的解說讓我感到憂慮
他的關係是:非必然結果
things that are ATTACKED may not neceassarily be VANQUISHED;
things that are GOADED may not necessarily be PROVOKED
我是覺得這解釋好牽強
這樣好像每個選項都可以這樣掰
我類比寫到現在,好像也沒看過類似的關係
還是說有強者可以另外提供幾個也是「非必然結果」的關係類比嗎?
感謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.123.64.42
※ 編輯: cloud7556 來自: 122.123.64.42 (09/27 21:29)
→
09/27 21:48, , 1F
09/27 21:48, 1F
推
09/28 00:13, , 2F
09/28 00:13, 2F
推
09/28 18:48, , 3F
09/28 18:48, 3F
→
09/28 18:48, , 4F
09/28 18:48, 4F