[SC. ] 詢問OG SC第675題

看板GMAT作者 (我難過)時間3年前 (2020/07/01 22:03), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
From an experiment using special extrasensory perception cards, each bearing one of a set of symbols, parapsychologist Joseph Banks Rhine claimed statistical proof for subjects who could use thought transference to identify a card in the dealer's hand. A. for subjects who could use thought transference to identify a card in the dealer's hand B. for a card in the dealer's hand to be identified by subjects with thought transference C. of subjects able to identify with thought transference a card in the dealer's hand D. that subjects could identify a card in the dealer's hand by using thought transference E. that subjects are capable to use thought transference for identifying a card in the dealer's hand 想請問各位高手們OG 675題, 根據核心語意完整性刪去去ABC, 再根據capable to慣用語錯誤刪去E, 很快就可以選到答案D 但OG針對C的解釋寫道, the phrase that follows the preposition is ungrammertical,requiring a particicle to modify "subjects",such as "being able to" 不懂這裡的able to 有甚麼文法問題?為何要改成being able to? 我原本的理解是 subjects who are able to....省略who are 變成subjects able to 不過依據OG的解釋我的想法顯然有問題 再勞煩版上高手指點 謝謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.228.84.207 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/GMAT/M.1593612190.A.3C7.html
文章代碼(AID): #1U_9UUF7 (GMAT)