[CR. ] PP-1-23

看板GMAT作者 (阿元)時間14年前 (2010/08/13 16:09), 編輯推噓1(105)
留言6則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/1
From 1978 to 1988, beverage containers accounted for a steadily decreasing percentage of the total weight of household garbage in the United States. The increasingly widespread practice of recycling aluminum and glass was responsible for most of this decline. However, although aluminum recycling was more widely practiced in this period than glass recycling, it was found that the weight of glass bottles in household garbage declined by a greater percentage than the weight of aluminum cans. Which of the following, if true of the United States in the period 1978 to 1988, most helps to account for the finding? (A) Glass bottles are significantly heavier than aluminum cans of comparable size. (B) Recycled aluminum cans were almost all beverage containers, but a significant fraction of the recycled glass bottles had contained products other than beverages. (C) Manufacturers replaced many glass bottles, but few aluminum cans, with plastic containers. (D) The total weight of glass bottles purchased by households increased at a slightly faster rate than the total weight of aluminum cans. (E) In many areas, glass bottles had to be sorted by color of the glass before being recycled, whereas aluminum cans required no sorting. 答案是 C 我選了 A 答案 C 怪怪的, 題目是講 重量 (weight), 答案 C 卻改提 數量, 怎麼還會正確呢??? -- -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 211.21.104.32

08/13 16:21, , 1F
重點是重量減少的"percentage"
08/13 16:21, 1F

08/13 16:32, , 2F
是阿,但玻璃罐重量%減少較多,不代表玻璃罐的數量減少較多呀
08/13 16:32, 2F

08/13 16:33, , 3F
A選項: 因為一個玻璃罐重量 > 一個鋁罐, 所以即使玻璃罐比較
08/13 16:33, 3F

08/13 16:33, , 4F
少被回收, 但因為重量較重, 所以最後減少的 % 可能還是比較多
08/13 16:33, 4F

08/13 16:37, , 5F
喔 瞭解你的意思...是指 重量 % 的減少 等同於 數量的減少嚕?
08/13 16:37, 5F

08/13 16:52, , 6F
是的~
08/13 16:52, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #1CPFsqTj (GMAT)