[CR. ] PP3 No.87
87. (31284-!-item-!-188;#058&005747)
Two years ago, the government of Runagia increased by 20 percent the
government-provided pensions paid to Runagians over 65. The aim of the
increase was to stimulate the economy in the rural regions of the country,
where most pension recipients live. Statistics, however, show that there has
been no increase in economic activity in those regions since then, but that
there has been noticeably more spending in the urban areas.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the increase
resulted in the unintended state of affairs described?
A. Until the pensions were increased, many Runagians over 65 in rural regions
had been receiving support from their children who live in urban areas.
這題答案是(A)，我想請教大家，這個選項該怎麼解釋呢？
在退休金尚未增加前，許多R國的住在鄉村地區的老人持續地接受住在都市的兒女們援助
那退休金增加後，住在鄉村的老人是把欠的錢還給都市的兒女了嗎？
否則怎麼會鄉村經濟活動沒增加，反而都市增加了呢？
好像有點過度推論......
--
▄▄▄▄▄▄
▏
▏
●
▋
∥ ~ HAHAOGC ~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.36.15.40
→
08/12 23:26, , 1F
08/12 23:26, 1F
→
08/12 23:26, , 2F
08/12 23:26, 2F
→
08/12 23:27, , 3F
08/12 23:27, 3F
→
08/12 23:27, , 4F
08/12 23:27, 4F
→
08/12 23:27, , 5F
08/12 23:27, 5F
推
08/12 23:28, , 6F
08/12 23:28, 6F
→
08/12 23:29, , 7F
08/12 23:29, 7F
→
08/12 23:32, , 8F
08/12 23:32, 8F
→
08/12 23:32, , 9F
08/12 23:32, 9F
→
08/12 23:34, , 10F
08/12 23:34, 10F
→
08/12 23:34, , 11F
08/12 23:34, 11F
→
08/13 15:52, , 12F
08/13 15:52, 12F
→
12/02 18:51,
5年前
, 13F
12/02 18:51, 13F