[語文] OV-CR-41
Leaders of a miners' union on strike against Coalco are contemplating
additional measures to pressure the company to accept the union's contract
proposal. The union leaders are considering as their principal new
tactic a consumer boycott against Gasco gas stations, which are owned by
Energy Uncorporated, the same corporation that owns Coalco.
The answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly relevant to
the union leader's consideration of whether attempting a boycott of Gasco
will lead to acceptance of their contract proposal?
A.Would revenue losses by Gasco seriously affect Energy Incorporated?
B.Can current Gasco customers easily obtain gasoline elsewhere?
C.Have other miners' unions won contractors similar to the one proposed
by this union?
D.Have other unions that have employed a similar tactic achieved their goals
with it?
E.Do other corporations that own coal companies also own gas stations?
我對這題的理解是, 公會leader正在用罷工迫使Coalco接受一個提案
他們考慮用一個新戰術--消費者抵制來對付Gasco--因為
Gasco跟Coalco背後的股東都是EI這間公司
題目是問下列哪個問題跟這個新招最沒相關？
A.Gasco的損失可以影響到EI, okay
B.Gasco的顧客可以隨時取得gasline替代品, okay相關
C.D講到其他公會的方案, 我不是很瞭解這跟題目有相關嗎.....
E.有其他的煤礦公司也擁有瓦斯公司嗎？ 我的理解有誤嗎....
在選擇CDE上面有浪費一些時間, 想請問關鍵區別CDE的點在哪裡, 謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.240.83.123
推
12/13 00:19, , 1F
12/13 00:19, 1F
→
12/13 00:19, , 2F
12/13 00:19, 2F
→
12/13 00:20, , 3F
12/13 00:20, 3F
→
12/13 00:21, , 4F
12/13 00:21, 4F
→
12/13 01:03, , 5F
12/13 01:03, 5F