[語文] SC代名詞問題 PP2 #36
想請問各位
談到代名詞時
老莫曾說優先指代原題主詞
PP詳解總是說指代最近的那個名詞
但有時候原題主詞可能不是最接近代名詞的那個名詞
這就變成要去鑽研句意才能下得了手
但到底是老莫為準 還是PP詳解的說法為準呢
以下有個例題PP2 #36
A group of paleotologists recently announced that a site in Utah
has yield fossils of some of the biggest armored dinosaurs ever found,
and that they were at least 25 million years older than any similar dinosaur
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
type previously found in North America.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(B)and they are at least 25 million years old than those of any similar
dinosaur type that previously was
PP詳解說(B)的they指代不明確 但若我把they視為最接近的名詞--dinosaurs
這樣的解釋說不通嗎??
正解:
(D)fossils that are at least 25 million years older than those of any
similar dinosaur type previouly
我覺得原題接到(D)這段好突兀喔
而且found不是該用被動語態嗎??
感謝高手的指點了~~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.68.14.19
推
07/14 11:49, , 1F
07/14 11:49, 1F
→
07/14 11:50, , 2F
07/14 11:50, 2F
→
07/14 11:50, , 3F
07/14 11:50, 3F
→
07/14 11:54, , 4F
07/14 11:54, 4F
推
07/14 11:55, , 5F
07/14 11:55, 5F
→
07/14 12:24, , 6F
07/14 12:24, 6F
→
07/14 12:25, , 7F
07/14 12:25, 7F
推
07/14 14:25, , 8F
07/14 14:25, 8F
→
07/14 14:26, , 9F
07/14 14:26, 9F
推
07/14 16:32, , 10F
07/14 16:32, 10F
→
07/14 17:30, , 11F
07/14 17:30, 11F
→
07/14 17:32, , 12F
07/14 17:32, 12F
→
07/14 17:32, , 13F
07/14 17:32, 13F
推
07/14 21:36, , 14F
07/14 21:36, 14F
→
07/14 21:37, , 15F
07/14 21:37, 15F