[分享] 房東根本不姓方!

看板FuMouDiscuss作者 (Dryden)時間10年前 (2014/04/12 12:32), 編輯推噓56(57119)
留言77則, 68人參與, 最新討論串1/1
網路上看到的圖片,這裡好像還沒有人分享 http://i.imgur.com/xvIhCz2.png
-- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.36.216.239 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/FuMouDiscuss/M.1397277160.A.243.html

04/12 12:33, , 1F
推!!!!
04/12 12:33, 1F

04/12 12:34, , 2F
這篇也違憲
04/12 12:34, 2F

04/12 12:34, , 3F
大推
04/12 12:34, 3F

04/12 12:34, , 4F
推自己的國家自己救
04/12 12:34, 4F

04/12 12:35, , 5F
哈哈 Fuck the Government
04/12 12:35, 5F

04/12 12:39, , 6F
FUCK THE GOVERNMENT!
04/12 12:39, 6F

04/12 12:39, , 7F
簡單明瞭
04/12 12:39, 7F

04/12 12:39, , 8F
姓王的粗來面對!
04/12 12:39, 8F

04/12 12:40, , 9F
王卓鈞喔? 我看段宜康真的拿棍子尻他 他也不會出來面對啦
04/12 12:40, 9F

04/12 12:40, , 10F
他被換了又怎樣,免洗局長 後面一堆
04/12 12:40, 10F

04/12 12:41, , 11F
王卓均這個人從以前就爽爽過 不拉他下來真的很不爽
04/12 12:41, 11F

04/12 12:42, , 12F
拉不下 除非馬江一起拔走才有可能
04/12 12:42, 12F

04/12 12:42, , 13F
04/12 12:42, 13F

04/12 12:44, , 14F
昨天方又說是內政部下令喔
04/12 12:44, 14F

04/12 12:46, , 15F
主管單位的長官是他 他難辭其咎
04/12 12:46, 15F

04/12 12:46, , 16F
04/12 12:46, 16F

04/12 12:46, , 17F
房東不是方 方是把你掃地出門的那個
04/12 12:46, 17F

04/12 12:47, , 18F
垃圾政府
04/12 12:47, 18F

04/12 12:48, , 19F
04/12 12:48, 19F

04/12 12:49, , 20F
04/12 12:49, 20F

04/12 12:49, , 21F
推!!簡單明瞭
04/12 12:49, 21F

04/12 12:50, , 22F
04/12 12:50, 22F

04/12 12:50, , 23F
04/12 12:50, 23F

04/12 12:51, , 24F
推 精闢!
04/12 12:51, 24F

04/12 12:54, , 25F
方是管理員 還有人說方不是自願的 有人拿槍逼你當走狗嗎
04/12 12:54, 25F

04/12 12:56, , 26F
比喻很好啊 可惜會無視的人還是會無視違憲的事實
04/12 12:56, 26F

04/12 12:57, , 27F
fuck the government
04/12 12:57, 27F

04/12 12:59, , 28F
精闢
04/12 12:59, 28F

04/12 13:00, , 29F
推 方他根本也難辭其咎
04/12 13:00, 29F

04/12 13:01, , 30F
前科累累紀錄不佳被掃是活該阿
04/12 13:01, 30F

04/12 13:01, , 31F
房東即所有權人,個人不覺得用房東比喻是恰當的,畢竟
04/12 13:01, 31F

04/12 13:02, , 32F
方3/23聽話指揮了鎮壓 方4/11聽話驅離了蔡教授
04/12 13:02, 32F

04/12 13:03, , 33F
如果真是契約屆滿,房東本來就可以不續租予他人,惟案例
04/12 13:03, 33F

04/12 13:03, , 34F
推,重點不在方而在幕後啊!!
04/12 13:03, 34F

04/12 13:04, , 35F
已分享
04/12 13:04, 35F

04/12 13:05, , 36F
租了五年沒幹過什麼事叫前科累累 ? 這邏輯學的真好
04/12 13:05, 36F

04/12 13:05, , 37F
04/12 13:05, 37F

04/12 13:07, , 38F
04/12 13:07, 38F

04/12 13:07, , 39F
集會自由是基本人權,權利本來就有,應無待房東同意吧?
04/12 13:07, 39F

04/12 13:10, , 40F
04/12 13:10, 40F

04/12 13:10, , 41F
簡言之,房東可以挑房客,但政府除危害公共利益不能侷限
04/12 13:10, 41F

04/12 13:11, , 42F
我想作者想說的是,房東不姓方,房東是台灣公民
04/12 13:11, 42F

04/12 13:12, , 43F
推 自己的國家自己救
04/12 13:12, 43F

04/12 13:12, , 44F
04/12 13:12, 44F

04/12 13:12, , 45F
而方,只是一位管理員,卻逾越職權驅趕房客,還限制房客
04/12 13:12, 45F

04/12 13:13, , 46F
dryden,感謝特別解釋,了解了,謝謝!
04/12 13:13, 46F

04/12 13:14, , 47F
那如果你是房東,房客違反租約,那能不能掃他出門?純討
04/12 13:14, 47F

04/12 13:14, , 48F
論,沒說聯盟違反集遊法其他沒被宣告違憲的法條
04/12 13:14, 48F

04/12 13:17, , 49F
要掃地出門還是要看違反的程度如何?不然一般都是期滿不
04/12 13:17, 49F

04/12 13:17, , 50F
續租吧?
04/12 13:17, 50F

04/12 13:20, , 51F
04/12 13:20, 51F

04/12 13:22, , 52F
04/12 13:22, 52F

04/12 13:25, , 53F
Fuck the government
04/12 13:25, 53F

04/12 13:26, , 54F
04/12 13:26, 54F

04/12 13:29, , 55F
04/12 13:29, 55F

04/12 13:40, , 56F
高調 推
04/12 13:40, 56F

04/12 13:42, , 57F
推!
04/12 13:42, 57F

04/12 13:51, , 58F
高調推
04/12 13:51, 58F

04/12 13:54, , 59F
04/12 13:54, 59F

04/12 13:55, , 60F
推!!
04/12 13:55, 60F

04/12 13:58, , 61F
無聊
04/12 13:58, 61F

04/12 14:01, , 62F
推啦!這樣才能讓那群看不懂的白痴懂
04/12 14:01, 62F

04/12 14:05, , 63F
為求公平不該忽略房客多次破壞房間原有擺設才被解約
04/12 14:05, 63F

04/12 14:27, , 64F
這樣我應該會去告房東 不是去嗆他
04/12 14:27, 64F

04/12 14:33, , 65F
推!
04/12 14:33, 65F

04/12 14:35, , 66F
房東到底是誰啊!!
04/12 14:35, 66F

04/12 14:35, , 67F
推 高調高調
04/12 14:35, 67F

04/12 14:37, , 68F
04/12 14:37, 68F

04/12 14:41, , 69F
04/12 14:41, 69F

04/12 14:51, , 70F
推 ~
04/12 14:51, 70F

04/12 15:33, , 71F
04/12 15:33, 71F

04/12 15:53, , 72F
04/12 15:53, 72F

04/12 17:11, , 73F
04/12 17:11, 73F

04/12 17:41, , 74F
有道理
04/12 17:41, 74F

04/12 18:40, , 75F
應該把他做成文宣,既然很多人擔心公投盟的台獨議題失焦,
04/12 18:40, 75F

04/12 18:41, , 76F
這份文宣既簡單明瞭,也能讓更多人輕鬆接受
04/12 18:41, 76F

04/13 20:29, , 77F
04/13 20:29, 77F
文章代碼(AID): #1JIC7e93 (FuMouDiscuss)