[心得] 包圍的急迫性?
10幾天前… 學生攻佔立法院時,曾跟許多朋友有過論戰
多數的觀點都是…
當窮極一切體制內的方式都失效時,只能需求體制外的衝撞
而且對他們來說,擋服貿有急迫性~ 不這麼做… 國家就有危機
當時… 我雖然不完全認同,但還是接受!
如今… 只因為抗議集遊法違憲,就包圍警局
這還有什麼好護航的? 爭路權有什麼急迫性到需要用到這種手段?
抗爭違憲是要聲請釋憲,而不是包圍警局,嗆暗殺分局長吧?
平心而論… 真的不會太過了嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.242.189.48
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/FuMouDiscuss/M.1397232653.A.C84.html
推
04/12 00:11, , 1F
04/12 00:11, 1F
→
04/12 00:11, , 2F
04/12 00:11, 2F
噓
04/12 00:11, , 3F
04/12 00:11, 3F
→
04/12 00:11, , 4F
04/12 00:11, 4F
我知道很重要… 我的意思是有急迫性到需要這樣做嗎?
沒有其他體制內的方式嗎?
※ 編輯: bcswoonhft (111.242.189.48), 04/12/2014 00:12:40
→
04/12 00:12, , 5F
04/12 00:12, 5F
→
04/12 00:12, , 6F
04/12 00:12, 6F
→
04/12 00:12, , 7F
04/12 00:12, 7F
噓
04/12 00:12, , 8F
04/12 00:12, 8F
→
04/12 00:13, , 9F
04/12 00:13, 9F
→
04/12 00:13, , 10F
04/12 00:13, 10F
→
04/12 00:13, , 11F
04/12 00:13, 11F
→
04/12 00:13, , 12F
04/12 00:13, 12F
→
04/12 00:13, , 13F
04/12 00:13, 13F
釋憲… 或透過議會質詢等方式~
服貿的急迫性是因為如果不馬上行動,等他過渡關山後就一切來不及
可是關於爭路權…
今天他不給路權,不代表事後沒辦法爭取到路權~
更何況我不相信收回路權是他能決定的…
→
04/12 00:13, , 14F
04/12 00:13, 14F
→
04/12 00:13, , 15F
04/12 00:13, 15F
噓
04/12 00:13, , 16F
04/12 00:13, 16F
→
04/12 00:14, , 17F
04/12 00:14, 17F
→
04/12 00:14, , 18F
04/12 00:14, 18F
※ 編輯: bcswoonhft (111.242.189.48), 04/12/2014 00:17:27
→
04/12 00:14, , 19F
04/12 00:14, 19F
→
04/12 00:15, , 20F
04/12 00:15, 20F
→
04/12 00:15, , 21F
04/12 00:15, 21F
噓
04/12 00:15, , 22F
04/12 00:15, 22F
→
04/12 00:15, , 23F
04/12 00:15, 23F
→
04/12 00:16, , 24F
04/12 00:16, 24F
噓
04/12 00:19, , 25F
04/12 00:19, 25F
噓
04/12 00:22, , 26F
04/12 00:22, 26F
→
04/12 00:25, , 27F
04/12 00:25, 27F
→
04/12 00:26, , 28F
04/12 00:26, 28F
→
04/12 00:28, , 29F
04/12 00:28, 29F
→
04/12 00:29, , 30F
04/12 00:29, 30F
→
04/12 00:30, , 31F
04/12 00:30, 31F
推
04/12 00:36, , 32F
04/12 00:36, 32F
→
04/12 00:36, , 33F
04/12 00:36, 33F
→
04/12 00:37, , 34F
04/12 00:37, 34F
→
04/12 00:38, , 35F
04/12 00:38, 35F
討論串 (同標題文章)