[閒聊] 為什麼這次的運動只能是「學運」?
我已經不是學生了。
也沒有那麼積極的衝到台北去反or支持服貿。
但確實是有點關心這協議在幹嘛。
也有點關心這一連串活動的過程...。
如果這一連串活動、事件發生的導火線,是因為一開始的程序不正義。
那麼難道除了「學生」以外的公民,不能因為在意這樣的程序不正義
,而去關心或參與這些抗爭活動嗎?
甚至為什麼有明確政黨傾向的公民,不能支援這些活動呢?
這中間有必然的道德問題嗎?
因為我看不出來,有民進黨政治傾向的公民或者黨員,去相關支援跟自己立場相同
,或者說「利益相同」的活動,是有問題的嗎?
整個很迷惑的看著電視名嘴們對話。
有人能夠給我一些理論、立場...等等的說明嗎?
感謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.224.55.117
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/FuMouDiscuss/M.1396103970.A.2E5.html
推
03/29 22:40, , 1F
03/29 22:40, 1F
→
03/29 22:40, , 2F
03/29 22:40, 2F
→
03/29 22:40, , 3F
03/29 22:40, 3F
→
03/29 22:40, , 4F
03/29 22:40, 4F
推
03/29 22:40, , 5F
03/29 22:40, 5F
推
03/29 22:41, , 6F
03/29 22:41, 6F
→
03/29 22:41, , 7F
03/29 22:41, 7F
推
03/29 22:41, , 8F
03/29 22:41, 8F
→
03/29 22:41, , 9F
03/29 22:41, 9F
→
03/29 22:41, , 10F
03/29 22:41, 10F
→
03/29 22:41, , 11F
03/29 22:41, 11F
推
03/29 22:42, , 12F
03/29 22:42, 12F
→
03/29 22:42, , 13F
03/29 22:42, 13F
→
03/29 22:42, , 14F
03/29 22:42, 14F
推
03/29 22:43, , 15F
03/29 22:43, 15F
→
03/29 22:43, , 16F
03/29 22:43, 16F
推
03/29 22:43, , 17F
03/29 22:43, 17F
→
03/29 22:43, , 18F
03/29 22:43, 18F
→
03/29 22:43, , 19F
03/29 22:43, 19F
→
03/29 22:44, , 20F
03/29 22:44, 20F
推
03/29 22:44, , 21F
03/29 22:44, 21F
→
03/29 22:44, , 22F
03/29 22:44, 22F
→
03/29 22:45, , 23F
03/29 22:45, 23F
→
03/29 22:46, , 24F
03/29 22:46, 24F
→
03/29 22:47, , 25F
03/29 22:47, 25F
推
03/29 22:58, , 26F
03/29 22:58, 26F
推
03/29 22:58, , 27F
03/29 22:58, 27F
推
03/29 23:01, , 28F
03/29 23:01, 28F