[國媒] 干涉新聞自由 奢談捍衛民主 [中時]
看板FuMouDiscuss作者zzyyxx77 (中華台北巨砲-陳金鋒)時間11年前 (2014/03/27 07:04)推噓-46(5推 51噓 21→)留言77則, 64人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
太陽花學運在服貿議題,高喊「捍衛民主」、「程序正義」,引發社會響應;但學運卻出
現控制新聞、以字條貼滿採訪車抗議媒體等現象,公民若沒能以自身出發,展現尊重新聞
採訪自由、社會多元聲音的民主價值,那怎能說服人捍衛民主呢?
太陽花學運訴求「捍衛民主」、「程序正義」價值,不過學生們曾在議場上以「讀報」的
方式,痛罵、批鬥不合乎他們喜好的言論,完全不能容納異己聲音、不能接受來自各方的
檢視;甚至還曾要求記者離開議場時,得先告訴學生「你會報導什麼?」對記者實行新聞
檢查,企圖箝制不滿意、不利己的言論,這些實在不是正常民主國家會發生的現象。
學生們攻佔行政院與警方出現暴力衝突時,大批學生高喊「記者拍、記者走向前」,替公
民「紀錄真實」,但一方面卻阻擋記者紀錄刺破輪胎、破壞公物等畫面,干涉新聞報導自
由,阻止記者「平衡報導」的天職。
反服貿公民運動大致上理性、和平,偶有脫序行為模糊焦點,招惹輿論批評,也是學運必
經過程。但學生們若有不同意見,就應該發揮公民精神,透過正常管道表達立場、重申主
張,而不是私下限制新聞採訪自由,「要大家通通聽你的」,這跟你們所唾棄的黑箱作業
一樣,很不民主。
http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20140327000523-260102
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.3.39.13
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/FuMouDiscuss/M.1395875066.A.018.html
→
03/27 07:04, , 1F
03/27 07:04, 1F
噓
03/27 07:05, , 2F
03/27 07:05, 2F
→
03/27 07:06, , 3F
03/27 07:06, 3F
→
03/27 07:06, , 4F
03/27 07:06, 4F
噓
03/27 07:06, , 5F
03/27 07:06, 5F
噓
03/27 07:06, , 6F
03/27 07:06, 6F
推
03/27 07:06, , 7F
03/27 07:06, 7F
→
03/27 07:07, , 8F
03/27 07:07, 8F
→
03/27 07:07, , 9F
03/27 07:07, 9F
→
03/27 07:07, , 10F
03/27 07:07, 10F
噓
03/27 07:07, , 11F
03/27 07:07, 11F
噓
03/27 07:07, , 12F
03/27 07:07, 12F
噓
03/27 07:07, , 13F
03/27 07:07, 13F
→
03/27 07:07, , 14F
03/27 07:07, 14F
噓
03/27 07:07, , 15F
03/27 07:07, 15F
噓
03/27 07:07, , 16F
03/27 07:07, 16F
噓
03/27 07:08, , 17F
03/27 07:08, 17F
噓
03/27 07:09, , 18F
03/27 07:09, 18F
噓
03/27 07:13, , 19F
03/27 07:13, 19F
噓
03/27 07:13, , 20F
03/27 07:13, 20F
→
03/27 07:13, , 21F
03/27 07:13, 21F
噓
03/27 07:14, , 22F
03/27 07:14, 22F
→
03/27 07:14, , 23F
03/27 07:14, 23F
噓
03/27 07:15, , 24F
03/27 07:15, 24F
→
03/27 07:16, , 25F
03/27 07:16, 25F
→
03/27 07:17, , 26F
03/27 07:17, 26F
噓
03/27 07:19, , 27F
03/27 07:19, 27F
噓
03/27 07:22, , 28F
03/27 07:22, 28F
噓
03/27 07:22, , 29F
03/27 07:22, 29F
→
03/27 07:22, , 30F
03/27 07:22, 30F
噓
03/27 07:23, , 31F
03/27 07:23, 31F
→
03/27 07:23, , 32F
03/27 07:23, 32F
推
03/27 07:24, , 33F
03/27 07:24, 33F
噓
03/27 07:25, , 34F
03/27 07:25, 34F
噓
03/27 07:26, , 35F
03/27 07:26, 35F
→
03/27 07:27, , 36F
03/27 07:27, 36F
噓
03/27 07:28, , 37F
03/27 07:28, 37F
→
03/27 07:29, , 38F
03/27 07:29, 38F
噓
03/27 07:30, , 39F
03/27 07:30, 39F
推
03/27 07:30, , 40F
03/27 07:30, 40F
→
03/27 07:31, , 41F
03/27 07:31, 41F
噓
03/27 07:36, , 42F
03/27 07:36, 42F
噓
03/27 07:37, , 43F
03/27 07:37, 43F
噓
03/27 07:39, , 44F
03/27 07:39, 44F
噓
03/27 07:39, , 45F
03/27 07:39, 45F
噓
03/27 07:40, , 46F
03/27 07:40, 46F
→
03/27 07:42, , 47F
03/27 07:42, 47F
噓
03/27 07:45, , 48F
03/27 07:45, 48F
噓
03/27 07:45, , 49F
03/27 07:45, 49F
噓
03/27 07:45, , 50F
03/27 07:45, 50F
噓
03/27 07:53, , 51F
03/27 07:53, 51F
→
03/27 08:16, , 52F
03/27 08:16, 52F
噓
03/27 08:17, , 53F
03/27 08:17, 53F
噓
03/27 08:17, , 54F
03/27 08:17, 54F
噓
03/27 08:29, , 55F
03/27 08:29, 55F
推
03/27 08:34, , 56F
03/27 08:34, 56F
噓
03/27 08:38, , 57F
03/27 08:38, 57F
噓
03/27 08:50, , 58F
03/27 08:50, 58F
噓
03/27 08:50, , 59F
03/27 08:50, 59F
噓
03/27 08:51, , 60F
03/27 08:51, 60F
噓
03/27 08:52, , 61F
03/27 08:52, 61F
噓
03/27 09:30, , 62F
03/27 09:30, 62F
噓
03/27 09:30, , 63F
03/27 09:30, 63F
→
03/27 09:32, , 64F
03/27 09:32, 64F
→
03/27 09:45, , 65F
03/27 09:45, 65F
噓
03/27 09:47, , 66F
03/27 09:47, 66F
噓
03/27 09:48, , 67F
03/27 09:48, 67F
噓
03/27 09:50, , 68F
03/27 09:50, 68F
噓
03/27 10:06, , 69F
03/27 10:06, 69F
噓
03/27 10:14, , 70F
03/27 10:14, 70F
噓
03/27 11:34, , 71F
03/27 11:34, 71F
推
03/27 11:46, , 72F
03/27 11:46, 72F
→
03/27 13:15, , 73F
03/27 13:15, 73F
噓
03/27 13:20, , 74F
03/27 13:20, 74F
噓
03/27 13:59, , 75F
03/27 13:59, 75F
噓
03/27 14:47, , 76F
03/27 14:47, 76F
噓
03/27 17:24, , 77F
03/27 17:24, 77F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):